Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 100 votes)
5 stars
28(28%)
4 stars
40(40%)
3 stars
32(32%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
100 reviews
April 17,2025
... Show More
These books awakened my love for the natural world. I don't think I could overstate what they mean to me.
April 17,2025
... Show More
this man is born for physics...the language is so clear...he starts by raising our first doubts about every notion of physics then slowly clears them...extremely "feelable"...which is very important as far as understanding is concerned in physics
April 17,2025
... Show More
A benchmark of introductory science books! After it I ended up writing search queries like this one: Books like Feynman Lectures on physics for chemistry, etc.
April 17,2025
... Show More
One of the books I have enjoyed the most ever. Especially the 2nd volume (on E&M).
April 17,2025
... Show More
Embarrasses me that undergrads fifty years ago were learning things I still don't know. Haha.
April 17,2025
... Show More
It was a long time wish to read these books. I admire the way large complex topics are broken down into pieces and explained in an easy to read way. In comparison with other books the mathematics is not getting in the way of understanding the physics concepts.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Physics writing at it's boldest and finest. Feynman's perspective is unique.
April 17,2025
... Show More
I used to see this on people's shelves when I was a kid and always wondered what was inside the "three red books." Well the short answer is: everything. It's a great way to learn physics Feynman's way, which means very little problem solving but a lot of deep comprehension and a thematic approach to physics. Meaning: he shows you certain paradigmatic problems which illuminate the physical world and which you can use over and over again. Also he shows you advance peeks at more advanced science, which you will certainly not get in most undergrad physics textbooks. Caveat: Feynman is not so deep philosophically. His take on relativity is strictly for calculational purposes and even in quantum (his specialty) you will find very few deep philosophical insights into the theory besides just: "shut up and calculate!" He seemed to be allergic to mixing philosophy and physics but sometimes it is unavoidable.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.