...
Show More
After reading this I can better understand why there was such a huge uprising against Late Victoriana. It's lifeless, colourless, and turgid. The best it has to offer is a detailed description of the inside of a pottery factory in the early 1900s. Even that is neutered by the fact that the protagonist, Anna, is so impressed with everything because it's owned by her beau Mynors that no actual commentary is made about the working conditions.
Mynors is a delightful capitalist who is personally responsible for reversing a longstanding trend in craftwork of having Mondays off. Yup. He is basically Jeff Bezos in white flannels. Anna's actually in love with another man the whole time and realises on the last page but still marries Mynors because reasons.
Reading the word 'Mynors' over and over made my brain want to die in confusion between the visual contrast between 'mynah' (like the bird) and 'minor' (the pronunciation). This is a Cinderella story that cuts out all the fun parts, because Bennett's idea of describing the fun of shopping is to say 'Anna bought one sensible navy skirt'. 100% ugh.
Mynors is a delightful capitalist who is personally responsible for reversing a longstanding trend in craftwork of having Mondays off. Yup. He is basically Jeff Bezos in white flannels. Anna's actually in love with another man the whole time and realises on the last page but still marries Mynors because reasons.
Reading the word 'Mynors' over and over made my brain want to die in confusion between the visual contrast between 'mynah' (like the bird) and 'minor' (the pronunciation). This is a Cinderella story that cuts out all the fun parts, because Bennett's idea of describing the fun of shopping is to say 'Anna bought one sensible navy skirt'. 100% ugh.