Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 99 votes)
5 stars
37(37%)
4 stars
32(32%)
3 stars
30(30%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
99 reviews
April 25,2025
... Show More
The Great Gatsby is the single most iconic novel of the Roaring Twenties or “Jazz Age”, and, more broadly, of 20th-century American literature — the American High School curriculum has undoubtedly contributed to this illustrious reputation. It doesn’t look like much though. Just a short novel (under 200 pages) recounting a tragic experience occurred to a bunch of Long Island hedonistic upstarts who spend their time boozing, smoking, dancing foxtrot, pool-partying, golfing and cheating on each other, all possibly to forget the traumas of the First World War. In comparison, Marcel Proust’s diner parties descriptions, before the War, seem a bit prim, starchy and bundled up.

The genius of Fitzgerald lies in the fact that his narrator (as in Proust) tells his story after the fact and with some degree of detachment. Such that it all seems like an insane, slightly sad and ultimately inessential pageant. The drama of the love triangle and the eventual tragic denouement is seen as though through a softening lens. The way Fitzgerald uses ellipses and euphemisms is quite striking as well. For instance, this sentence towards the end, when the narrator stares at the swimming pool: “A small gust of wind that scarcely corrugated the surface was enough to disturb its accidental course with its accidental burden.” (Penguin Classics, p. 172 — I won’t decode this now to avoid spoilers, but I encourage you, faithful readers, to check it out.)

His description of places, people and atmosphere — the glamorous, glittering, glimmering fairy-girls, the hyper-gaudy, twinkling, moonlit, colourful hanky-pankies, the scorching, golden heatwave over a Versailles-like New York — are all powerfully evocative, dream-like almost. The crepuscular ending, a Whitmanian suggestion of the American myth as a transient, unreal garden of earthly delights — which soon enough will be turned into a valley of ashes, fuming under the stare of giant billboards —, is both elegiac and sublime.

Gatsby himself, described as radiant by the narrator (the epithet “the great” puts him, oddly enough, on par with kings and emperors), seems, in fact, a bit depressed, lonely, detached from the world. He is, in short, a blurry, suave, ascetic onlooker amidst the outpouring of luxury and licence of a gigantic courtship ritual — and, frankly, his compulsion to call everyone “old sport” is a bit tiring. Tom Buchanan is a livelier character, but quite obviously an entitled sexist, racist, and an insufferable brutal asshole. The female characters, Jordan, Daisy, Myrtle, by contrast, are cute little flappers but singularly lacking in intensity.

The Great Gatsby is many things at once in a short format. A novel about the luxurious and decadent parties of the narrator’s mysterious neighbour — redolent of Trimalchio’s banquet in Petronius’s Satyricon. The Great Gatsby is also about a narrator fascinated by and reporting (more or less credibly) on a shadowy, romantic, elusive figure — Nick Carraway on Jay Gatsby, like, say, Ishmael on Ahab in Moby-Dick. The Great Gatsby is also a novel about a romantic and domestic tragedy. And finally, this novel provides an outline for Hardboiled Fiction, which achieved enormous success only a decade later, with Dashiell Hammett and Raymond Chandler.

Baz Luhrmann (Moulin Rouge, Romeo + Juliet) offered an adaptation of Fitzgerald’s novel in 2013, with Leo DiCaprio in the title role — I haven’t watched this movie yet. However, the fascinating Spring Breakers (same year, with James Franco and Selena Gomez) might well be considered a contemporary take on Fitzgerald’s masterpiece... Or, for that matter, just any other Justin Bieber or Nicki Minaj’s careless wondermilk-flowing pool-partying music video!
April 25,2025
... Show More
i love this book. yes, it is a story about vapid and shallow people who live selfish and hedonistic lives and treat other people like playthings, but there is an elegance, a restraint to the prose that manages to discuss, in the same tone, both doomed love and the breakdown of the american dream. and it is masterful. some may say the great american novel.

and so this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OULhla...

makes me want to tear my eyes out with my hands and stomp on them forever and ever.

yeah, you thought this was going to be a book review, didn't you? and maybe goodreads will choose to make this a "hidden" review under their new policies, but i don't care, because it makes me so angry that this is happening in this way that i have to scream about it, even if no one hears me, and there isn't enough room in a status update for me to vent my rage, and this is a book community, and i feel like you should all feel and share my outrage...

WHO THOUGHT LEONARDO DICAPRIO WOULD MAKE A GOOD GATSBY?? AND WHY DOES IT LOOK LIKE HE IS IN THE GAP WHEN HE IS FLINGING ALL THOSE CLOTHES AROUND???

it is unbelievable. i haven't read this book in years, but i know that it did not take place in some art deco-themed casino in vegas.

and i assume the commentary on over-the-top consumption is just as relevant to our times as fitzgerald's, and the makes-you-squint way it is shot and the soundtrack (what is that soundtrack all about???) is a modern-day reinterpretation of jazz-age glam; a reversal of the futuristic sci-fi films of the seventies, but it is making me puke and i want to stop puking, please.

this is not my american dream.

come to my blog!
April 25,2025
... Show More
Jay Gatsby, you poor doomed bastard. You were ahead of your time. If you would have pulled your scam after the invention of reality TV, you would have been a huge star on a show like The Bachelor and a dozen shameless Daisy-types would have thrown themselves at you.

Mass media and modern fame would have embraced the way you tried to push your way into a social circle you didn’t belong to in an effort to fulfill a fool’s dream as your entire existence became a lie and you desperately sought to rewrite history to an ending you wanted. You had a talent for it, Jay, but a modern PR expert would have made you bigger than Kate Gosselin. Your knack for self-promotion and over the top displays of wealth to try and buy respectability would have fit right in these days. I can just about see you on a red carpet with Paris Hilton.

And the ending would have been different. No aftermath for rich folks these days. Lawyers and pay-off money would have quietly settled the matter. No harm, no foul. But then you’d have realized how worthless Daisy really was at some point. I’m sure you couldn’t have dealt with that. So maybe it is better that your story happened in the Jazz Age where you could keep your illusions intact to the bitter end.

The greatest American novel? I don’t know if there is such an animal. But I think you'd have to include this one in the conversation.
April 25,2025
... Show More
...گتسبی به نور سبز ایمان داشت

این داستان بلند رو باید دو بار مرور می کردم (یه بار خود داستان و یه بار اقتباس سینماییش با بازی لئوناردو دیکاپریو) تا عمیقاً عاشق "گتسبیِ حقیقتاً بزرگ" بشم. داستان به خودی خود اینقدر خوب نیست که آدم رو غرق در خودش بکنه. آدم باید دقت کنه تا زوایای شخصیت گتسبی رو بشناسه. اون وقت تازه میفهمه که چرا این گتسبی، گستبیِ بزرگه.

گتسبیِ حقیقتاً بزرگ

n  n

گتسبی، مردی روستازاده است، که با رؤیاهای بزرگ، خانواده ی فقیرش رو ترک میکنه و عازم اروپا میشه. اونجا عاشق میشه، ولی به عشقش نمیرسه.
بعد، تمام زندگیش، با ساده دلیِ کاملِ یه روستازاده، برای به دست آوردن عشقش و رؤیاش میجنگه. از هر راهی که می تونه. اگه این مرد قابل احترامه، نه به خاطر قابل احترام بودن کارهاشه. بلکه به خاطر اینه که نمی ترسه از این که برای رسیدن به رؤیای بزرگش، کارهایی بکنه که جامعه ی ریاکار و دو رو، کسایی همچون "تام"، غیرشرافتمندانه می دونن.
این خصوصیت، این آرمان طلب بودن گتسبی، مخصوصاً وقتی خوب به چشم میاد که با شخصیت های دور و برش مقایسه بشه، از جمله "دیزی" (که ترسش مانع از رسیدن به رؤیای پنج ساله ش میشه) و "تام" که کمابیش آنتاگونیست داستانه.

جدای از این خصوصیت مهم گتسبی، رفتارهای دیگه ش هم خیلی دوست داشتنی هستن. از جمله خجالت کشیدنش از گذشته ش و دروغ گفتنش برای پوشوندن گذشته ش، انزوا طلبی و غیر معاشرتی بودنش، یا جوانمردی ساده دلانه ش، یا دست و دل باز بودنش.

داستان
هر چقدر گتسبی دوست داشتنیه، رمان دوست داشتنی نیست. البته جاهایی که نویسنده با قلم شاعرانه ش وقایع و اشیا رو تحلیل میکنه، خیلی خوبه. اما داستان پردازی و مخصوصاً پایان بندی، اصلا و ابدا خوب نیست. پایان بندی کاملاً اتفاقیه و نتیجه ی علّی و معلولی وقایع پیشین نیست. جدای از این که از لحاظ قتل و هفت تیر کشی، شبیه فیلم های هالیوودیه.
April 25,2025
... Show More
The eh Gatsby

Classic. Yes. THE great American novel. Hmph, so I heard. I suppose it should make one more interested, or at least feel more compelled to read something (or re-read as is the case here) when it has "classic" and "everyone else loves it!" stamped all over it. And has a movie made out of it, though what beloved novel hasn't these days? Of course, I originally read FSF's Gatsby because I was expected to for a high school English class. So, even though I was never the type to do homework, I read The Great Gatsby because it had a neat cover, Fitzgerald is fun to say, and, of course, the legend of Zelda.

Unfortunately for Meredyth, my thoughts on Gatsby 10 years ago are pretty similar to the thoughts I have on it today: How pretty. Pretty decedant. How drippy. How zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

It's not that I was completely uninterested. It's that my interest was never piqued to the point of really giving a shit. Sure, who doesn't love a hot mysteriously wealthy man with serious heart ache for a serious material girl? What about those rich dudes who may be crooks but no one can figger out how crooked they are exactly because how crooked can you be if you throw such mean hoedowns?!

Oh, and I love a good morally ambiguous-protaganist/narrator-who-hates-parties-and-society-but-just-can't-seem-to-stay-away as much as the next person, but Nick, our hero, just wants to be liked so very much, and unfortunately, he reads like a sap. And when all the other characters are unforgivable bores, I would prefer that my ambiguous, socially mandated narrator manage to keep me awake.

What about those three stars? You ask. Well I can't lie. I do think Fitz had a way with words. I did find that those subtle nuances of the variations in lifestyle during the depression to be very much in effect, and I would be happy to visit any fictional small town called West Egg. Or East Egg for that matter. And I get the kind of crazy he was going for in his more psychopathic character, George Wilson, who, because he was in love, becomes the bastiOn of normalcy even when he is driven to murder and his own suicide.

FSF did manage to be believably compassionate towards his seemingly less insane characters, (who are all on the brink of insanity) (but still made me drowsy). There is definitely a part of me that sees how one could be drawn into the twinkly lit world FSF created, supposedly, out of his own reality, and I have noted his passion for the beauty of the unfolding story, such as it is.

But I was disappointed 10 years ago by the story's inability to convince me it wasn't nap time, its unwillingness to point out the the relevance of the individual over society, and the irrelevance of the world Gatsby inhabits, and I was disappointed again this past week.

In summation, be sure to keep an eye out for this writer. Once he writes something more appealing to the masses he's sure to bust out onto the scene soon. You heard it here first.
April 25,2025
... Show More
I firmly believe that "The Great Gatsby" is a novel that cannot be fully appreciated in a first read. I read it for the first time after college, and hated it. Now, 10 years later I have read it half a dozen times, and find it to be a richer and richer experience every time.
Fitzgerald was a talented writer, and there are times that the prose in this text is breathtakingly good. But that is not what makes this novel stand out as one of the greatest pieces of truly American literature. Rather it is the eternal optimism, sometimes misplaced, of Gatsby (and some of the other characters) that keeps calling to the reader long after the last page. Fitzgerald wrote a book that speaks to the American ideals and persona, and he did it in the guise of a love story. There is no better description of the indefatigable American spirit than the last page of this novel. It is literary perfection, and even if the book that preceded it was not incredible it would be worth the price.
I won't rehash plot points here, but I will say that in Gatsby, Daisy, Jordan Baker, and the amazingly well drawn Tom Buchanan, Fitzgerald created a cast of characters that will long reign as one of the most recognizable in the canon of American Lit. I recently reread this novel for a book club, and it is no coincidence that despite the many varied reactions to the book, everyone agreed that Tom stood out. We all knew a Tom in our lives. It speaks to Fitzgerald's honesty as a writer that one of the least likable characters in the text is one of the novel's standouts.
Don't read "The Great Gatsby" because you have to. Read it because you want to. And then put it aside and live a few more years of life. Then come back to it. You will be amazed what you will find in its pages that you did not find before.
April 25,2025
... Show More
A drunk on a train setting a moth free is a sight. The beauty of the catch, one-handed, swift and seemingly effortless as he launches it out the window is humbling as the writing in this novel.

We first see Jay Gatsby on a summer night. "In his blue gardens men and girls came and went like moths among the whisperings and the champagne and stars." Elusive Gatsby is the light to whom Nick, like Melville's Ishmael, is drawn. And like Ahab, Gatsby directs the course of events through "blue gardens" like blue seas holding wealth and destruction.

If riches were all that Gatsby and Ahab pursued, then their journeys would not be doomed. But both men go off track. One for revenge, the other for romance, strives for more than he can grasp. Read them together or in quick succession. Both are written with the care of a moth cradled in an outstretched hand.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Legendary F. Scott Fitzgerald---fiction based reality---only serves to illustrate a life so far removed from Gatsby's existence lived ever so briefly on "East Egg." Privilege is afforded to few and common rules become fuzzy (lacking application or enforcement) in a contrasted life of Gatsby and the Buchanans. Their world is witnessed via a clandestine view through his neighbor across the way.

Like the flashing green light on Daisy's dock, becoming an homage to Gatsby and his lavish parties and connections. If collaboration---not competition was a theme, an outcome could manifest into an intriguing alternate ending. However, the death of Gatsby is like the green light signaling a green monster consuming many (robotically). And such is an homage to the lost ones scattered violently by the hand of God—to the wastelands or a grave/garden of obscurity. Angels dare not tread here for long.

Ending is nothing novel, Gatsbys' past cannot be left behind and leads to the death of many (exlcuding Daisy/Tom). Nick Carraway is the astute observer recognizing the truth in saying, "Tom and Daisy are careless...fleeing the mess made." Gatsby and an alternative ending would require making plans, collaboration and something he was most afraid of, admitting “the truth of his newly acquired status. April 10, 2025 will be the 100th year anniversary of this the publication of this novel by F. Scott Fitzgerald.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Over drinks, I’ve observed—like so many smart alecks—that much of The Great Gatsby’s popularity relies heavily on its shortness. At a sparse 180 pages, Fitzgerald’s masterpiece could be argued to be the “Great American novella.” Gatsby, like so many other short classics, is easily readable, re-readable, and assessable to everyone from the attention-deficient young to mothers juggling a kid, a career, and a long-held desire to catch up on all those books “they should have read but haven’t gotten around to yet”.

I’ve now read Gatsby three times, and I admit that on my first reading during (like handfuls of others) my senior year English class, I wasn’t particularly fond of the book; I believe I used the adjective “overrated” on numerous occasions. Daisy Buchanan seemed like a twit of a woman, and I found Jay Gatsby to be pathetically clawing in his attempt to attain her. Nick, my guide, only annoyed me further with his apparent hero-worshiping of a man I found one-dimensional and his adoration for the kind of woman I’ve seen other men purport to be goddesses, but in fact, are dim-witted simpletons with nice figures.

Over my two subsequent readings—pushed along by friends whose judgment I trusted and who swore the book was “so funny and ironic”—I discovered within Fitzgerald’s fable a sardonic social wit and a heavily layered critique of the American Dream: the poor, working (wo)man rising above his or her social situation to discover money conquers all.

Fitzgerald has a discerning ability for sharp critiques of the economically privileged and, like Jane Austin, has an ear for realistic, bantering dialogue. Through Nick’s narration, we see a world that so many Americans dream of (its enviableness only further accentuated by our open disdain for it): a life of endless parties, delicious food, beautiful clothes, and Paris Hilton. Nick who’s paradoxically drawn to his cousin, Daisy’s, and her husband, Tom’s, lifestyle with gloating contempt echoes the contemporary American idolization of an elite lifestyle that none but a select few attain.

We watch Daisy with her voice that “sounds of money” flit about with uncompromising shallowness and vivacious school-girl frivolity, and through her, see so many of the inconsequential remarks and actions others (as well as ourselves) have made for the sheer sake of “having a good time”. In spite of her frivolity and weak disposition, we become, like Gatsby, “overwhelmingly aware of the youth and mystery that wealth imprisons and preserves, of the freshness of many clothes, and of Daisy, gleaming like silver, safe and proud above the hot struggles of the poor.”

Through Gatsby’s veneration of Daisy, we not only imagine what so many Americans desire (success), but also we see the goal and glittering fixation of all humanity: beauty. And like many Americans in the throes of Capitalism, Gatsby believes that money can buy beauty as well as love. Fitzgerald articulates this disillusion with haunting force, particularly voiced through Nick’s obsessive repulsion with the extravagant society his social status has allowed him and the sadness he finds while watching a “working man” attempt to enter it.

One critique of The Great Gatsby, which could also be argued as a positive, is the limited scope of action and themes Fitzgerald chooses to encapsulate. We only see the wealthy elite (or people wanting to be the wealthy elite), and only Nick really has any depth of characterization. Unlike a tome, such as War and Peace, Gatsby fails to have numerous interwoven plotlines within a grand historical context. Yes, the Jazz Age is the novel’s backdrop, but Fitzgerald fails to engage in any discussion beyond a summer among the wealthy youth partying into the wee hours of the night in the West Egg. Yet, the control with which Fitzgerald expresses his limited themes makes the novel’s lack of scope forgivable.

Gatsby is short and easily accessible, and I have no doubt these aspects of the novel do lend to its everlasting popularity. At the same time, it should never diminish its truly admirable ability to tease apart some of the most confounding qualities American culture values: money, beauty, youth, hard work, and the ever effusive, love.
April 25,2025
... Show More
Fitzgerald, you have ruined me.

Fitzgerald can set a scene so perfectly, flawlessly. He paints a world of magic and introduces one of the greatest characters of all time, Jay Gatsby. Gatsby is the embodiment of hope, and no one can dissuade him from his dreams. Have you ever had a dream that carried you to heights you could never have dreamed otherwise? When Gatsby is reunited with Daisy Buchanan, he fills the space to the brim with flowers, creating a living dream. How is anyone supposed to compete with that?

The Great Gatsby perfectly makes use of a narrator, Nick. Why is Gatsby so great? Because Nick tells us. If Gatsby told us, we would just think that he is a braggard, the least humble person in the world.

This book is wildly addictive, so intricate yet perfectly woven together, a brilliant literary masterpiece. I have to keep going back to reconnect with Jay Gatsby, a naïve but beautiful and charming hope, perfectly imperfect, a relentless dreamer.

2025 Reading Schedule
JantA Town Like Alice
FebtBirdsong
MartCaptain Corelli's Mandolin - Louis De Berniere
AprtWar and Peace
MaytThe Woman in White
JuntAtonement
JultThe Shadow of the Wind
AugtJude the Obscure
SeptUlysses
OcttVanity Fair
NovtA Fine Balance
DectGerminal

Connect With Me!
Blog Twitter BookTube Facebook Insta My Bookstore at Pango
April 25,2025
... Show More
English (The Great Gatsby) / Italiano

«In my younger and more vulnerable years my father gave me some advice that I’ve been turning over in my mind ever since. “Whenever you feel like criticizing any one,” he told me, “just remember that all the people in this world haven’t had the advantages that you’ve had.”»

The Great Gatsby, the book that most of all I postponed the reading. There was something in the title that didn't excite me, that didn't pass the smell. I was wrong.

The narrator, Nick Carraway, lives in a house across the street of the luxurious villa of Jay Gatsby, the embodiment of the American Dream. Nick is affected by Gatsby straight away,
and starts a friendship with him, helping him to win back the love of an old flame, that is married by now.

The novel is poetic at times, often cynical, with an enjoyable style of writing. The lesson is ruthless: the American Dream is exactly what it is. It is not real, it's only a dream.

Vote: 8




«Nei miei anni più giovani e vulnerabili mio padre mi diede un consiglio che non ho mai smesso di considerare. “Ogni volta che ti sentirai di criticare qualcuno,” mi disse, “ricordati che non tutti a questo mondo hanno avuto i tuoi stessi vantaggi”»

Il Grande Gatsby, il libro che più di tutti non mi decidevo a leggere. C'era qualcosa nel titolo che non mi entusiasmava, non mi ispirava. Avevo torto.

Il narratore Nick Carraway vive in un villino di fronte la sfarzosa dimora di Jay Gatsby, l'incarnazione del sogno americano. Ne subisce fin da subito l'influenza ed intreccia con lui un rapporto di amicizia, durante il quale cercherà di aiutarlo a riconquistare una vecchia fiamma di lui, oramai sposata.

Romanzo a tratti poetico, a tratti cinico, dallo stile più che gradevole. La morale è crudele: il sogno americano è proprio quello che è, solo un sogno.

Voto: 8

April 25,2025
... Show More
I read this, a tale of social climbing and dark secrets, when I was a teenager with a Farrah Fawcett poster Blu-Tacked to my bedroom wall.
I really must rediscover it, as I remember it as being so beautifully-written.

At the time, I derived some satisfaction in realising that the idle rich probably weren't all having an exhilarating time at their mansion parties, despite outward appearances.

Fitzgerald lifts the lid on the shallowness of the nouveau riche of 1920s' America.
My book had a photograph of a young Robert Redford on its cover, and so this is how I will forever imagine Jay Gatsby to look like.

And it's a timeless read; the author succeeded in creating a parable that will always be apposite (i.e. beware the vacuousness of aspiration for aspiration's sake).
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.