...
Show More
‘A Prayer for Owen Meany’ (1989) is John Irving’s epic story of the very singular phenomenon that is Owen Meany – as told by his lifelong and long suffering friend John Wheelwright.
Whilst acutely aware of the significant critical and popular acclaim attached to this novel (and recommended by several friends) – and ‘Owen Meany’ is certainly a very accomplished novel which definitely has its strengths and its moments; ultimately however I was underwhelmed. ‘Owen Meany’ failed to engage, excite, enthrall or move me. It also feels very much over long and indulgent at times and I think would have befitted by an editing down to at least 100 pages shorter.
The is much in ‘Owen Meany’ concerning religion, superstition, belief, magical realism, the Vietnam war, American/Canadian politics, premonitions, prayer, dreams, visions, illusions and delusions as well as much about death. All the ingredients of Irving’s novel along with its associated acclaim and the reputation of its author - mean that I would fully expect to have enjoyed and thought highly of ‘Owen Meany’, to have come away after reading, if not inspired, at least fulfilled and curious to read more Irving. Unfortunately, this was not the case and I really can’t properly pinpoint or establish why that is? Maybe expectations were just too high?
There is also in ‘Owen Meany’ what seems like an oft used literary device – a character who teaches English/Canadian literature, hence the scope for mentioning and referencing several ‘worthy’ authors (Atwood, Hardy, Shakespeare, Bronte(s) Dostoevsky et al) – which more often than not feels like an attempt to give a novel that additional literary gravitas, which in the majority of cases is overused and ultimately feels like a cheap trick.
In a word – disappointing. (Only just scraping 3 stars for me)
Whilst acutely aware of the significant critical and popular acclaim attached to this novel (and recommended by several friends) – and ‘Owen Meany’ is certainly a very accomplished novel which definitely has its strengths and its moments; ultimately however I was underwhelmed. ‘Owen Meany’ failed to engage, excite, enthrall or move me. It also feels very much over long and indulgent at times and I think would have befitted by an editing down to at least 100 pages shorter.
The is much in ‘Owen Meany’ concerning religion, superstition, belief, magical realism, the Vietnam war, American/Canadian politics, premonitions, prayer, dreams, visions, illusions and delusions as well as much about death. All the ingredients of Irving’s novel along with its associated acclaim and the reputation of its author - mean that I would fully expect to have enjoyed and thought highly of ‘Owen Meany’, to have come away after reading, if not inspired, at least fulfilled and curious to read more Irving. Unfortunately, this was not the case and I really can’t properly pinpoint or establish why that is? Maybe expectations were just too high?
There is also in ‘Owen Meany’ what seems like an oft used literary device – a character who teaches English/Canadian literature, hence the scope for mentioning and referencing several ‘worthy’ authors (Atwood, Hardy, Shakespeare, Bronte(s) Dostoevsky et al) – which more often than not feels like an attempt to give a novel that additional literary gravitas, which in the majority of cases is overused and ultimately feels like a cheap trick.
In a word – disappointing. (Only just scraping 3 stars for me)