...
Show More
50/100 or 2.5 stars
1. Writing: 7. I did enjoy Hawk’s writing style in the story. It’s definitely the strong point of the book.
2. Character Development: 5. The two main characters don’t really change much.
3. Plot: 5. It was kind of boring to be honest. If it weren’t such a quick read I would have DNF’d it due to a lack of interest.
4. Plausibility: 8. Most things in the story seem realistic.
5. Originality: 4. There isn’t all that much in here I haven’t already read many times.
6. Concept/Execution: 4. I think the summary/synopsis isn’t quite accurate. I was hoping for more road trip vibes than I got. There’s a lot of religious aspects to the story that I didn’t really care for, as it didn’t progress the story or feel necessary.
7. World-Building: 5. Some of the chapters felt like they dragged on. I felt like Hawk was speaking through the characters instead of the characters speaking for themselves (if that makes any sense).
8. Atmosphere: 4. Some parts were solid, but I didn’t feel very connected to the places or people.
9. Ending: 6. It was predictable and not very climatic. Not a terrible ending though.
10. Changed Perspective: 2. Eh. Not really. I will give him two points for the effort to make this book deep, however, the multiple forced attempts at depth fall flat.
1. Writing: 7. I did enjoy Hawk’s writing style in the story. It’s definitely the strong point of the book.
2. Character Development: 5. The two main characters don’t really change much.
3. Plot: 5. It was kind of boring to be honest. If it weren’t such a quick read I would have DNF’d it due to a lack of interest.
4. Plausibility: 8. Most things in the story seem realistic.
5. Originality: 4. There isn’t all that much in here I haven’t already read many times.
6. Concept/Execution: 4. I think the summary/synopsis isn’t quite accurate. I was hoping for more road trip vibes than I got. There’s a lot of religious aspects to the story that I didn’t really care for, as it didn’t progress the story or feel necessary.
7. World-Building: 5. Some of the chapters felt like they dragged on. I felt like Hawk was speaking through the characters instead of the characters speaking for themselves (if that makes any sense).
8. Atmosphere: 4. Some parts were solid, but I didn’t feel very connected to the places or people.
9. Ending: 6. It was predictable and not very climatic. Not a terrible ending though.
10. Changed Perspective: 2. Eh. Not really. I will give him two points for the effort to make this book deep, however, the multiple forced attempts at depth fall flat.