...
Show More
12/6/2012: In these monthly essays that Hornby wrote for The Believer in 2003-4, he sets up a wonderful structure. He begins each essay with two lists: Books bought that month, and books read that month. He then launches into a musing, meandering essay, talking in and out of when and why he bought those books (following a lead from another book read or bought; fear that his brand new baby would keep him from ever buying a book again; being in the Los Angeles airport) and then why he read what he read, weaving all of this plus his considered reviews into a seamless narrative. (With some asides about The Polysyllabic Spree, his name for the editors of The Believer--perhaps the most hilarious part!)
I love the way he does all of this. I love that he confesses fully that he knows he'll never be able to read all the books he buys. I love that he integrates the description of his reading life with his thoughts about what he reads. I love his humility and his self-identification as a reader, not as a critic or even reviewer. He's just having the same thoughts and insights as any other informed and thoughtful reader! (And while I know this is not true, holding on to the illusion makes me want to read his reviews more than those of more erudite--read pompous--critics.) I love his easy tone and accessible sense of humor--just the sense that he loves doing exactly this: reading and writing about what he reads. Because yes, I want to do that too! And I wish I could do it as well as he does.
Luckily for me there are two more collections of these essays. And in the New Year I hope to try using this structure myself. It's a great way to keep track of all kinds of things, as well as a good exercise. Nice to have such a great model!
I love the way he does all of this. I love that he confesses fully that he knows he'll never be able to read all the books he buys. I love that he integrates the description of his reading life with his thoughts about what he reads. I love his humility and his self-identification as a reader, not as a critic or even reviewer. He's just having the same thoughts and insights as any other informed and thoughtful reader! (And while I know this is not true, holding on to the illusion makes me want to read his reviews more than those of more erudite--read pompous--critics.) I love his easy tone and accessible sense of humor--just the sense that he loves doing exactly this: reading and writing about what he reads. Because yes, I want to do that too! And I wish I could do it as well as he does.
Luckily for me there are two more collections of these essays. And in the New Year I hope to try using this structure myself. It's a great way to keep track of all kinds of things, as well as a good exercise. Nice to have such a great model!