...
Show More
This is basically a textbook about nonviolent struggle. The many historical examples of nonviolent struggle are interesting and the advice about strategies is probably pretty good. The book assumes, though, I think a much more centralized notion of who's waging the struggle than I think is often the case. Also the book assumes that violence always makes the opponents more harshly repressive in return, and while I think that is definitely the case a lot, I think history shows things are more nuanced than that, and sometimes violence or the threat of it from a third group allied to the people waging the struggle makes the opponents more willing to listen to the nonviolent group.