Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 99 votes)
5 stars
40(40%)
4 stars
33(33%)
3 stars
26(26%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
99 reviews
April 17,2025
... Show More
#RetoEdwardianspirit de la cuenta @victorianspiritsblog, premisa “Un Libro E.M. Forster”.

Primer acercamiento que hago a Forster, un autor a quien tenia muchas ganas. Quizás hubiera preferido iniciarme con él con “Regreso a Howard’s End” o “Mauricie” , pero la gracia del reto es quitarme algunos de mis eternos pendientes, y en mi estantería solo tenia ese libro de este autor. Así que todo recto y adelante.

La novela empieza con la llegada de Lucy Honeychurch y su prima Charlotte Bartlett a Florencia, instalándose en una pensión plagada de compatriotas ingleses. El descontento de ambas mujeres con las vistas de los cuartos que han alquilado las llevaran a conocer a los Emerson, un padre y su hijo que no son muy populares entre el resto de huéspedes. Lucy y el joven George desarrollaran una atracción que se contrapone a todas las convenciones sociales en las que ella se ha criado, y que la obligarán a huir precipitadamente de Florencia. A su vuelta a Inglaterra, Lucy asumirá el rol que se espera de ella prometiéndose al mundano Cecil Vyse. Pero su pasado, sus propias dudas y deseos y una coincidencia imprevista no la dejaran aceptar su papel tranquilamente….

Seré sincera: me ha gustado bastante esta novela, y creo que tiene muchas cosas buenas que voy a ir comentando más adelante poco a poco. Pero, a la vez, hay algo en ella que me ha faltado. Me ha resultado una lectura muy fría en no pocas ocasiones, no he terminado de conectar con ella hasta prácticamente su final. Y creo que esto se debe a la forma de trabajar del propio Forster. A lo largo de toda la narración si ha habido algo que me ha descolocado es la impresión de que todo estaba demasiado bien medido, de que cada pieza encajaba en el todo que era la novela de una manera demasiado perfecta. Y para mi eso le ha restado puntos, ya que como lectora le ha quitado cualquier evocación a frescura, naturalidad u improvisación, elementos que creo que no hubieran desentonado nada con el tipo de historia que Forster nos propone aquí. La vida raramente es tan organizada o cuadriculada como lo que he percibido en este libro, y eso se nota en cuanto a que me ha costado muchas veces dejarme llevar por la trama y sus personajes.

En esto sospecho que también tiene mucho que ver la propia forma de narrar de Forster. Porque si algo ha conseguido “Una Habitación con Vistas” es sorprenderme. Y de forma muy grata en no pocas ocasiones. Me esperaba una novela más liviana de leer y con menos transformado o profundidad. Una historia romántica con una pizca de critica que se leyera de una sentada. En cambio me he encontrado con una forma de narrar que obliga al lector a ir lento, a pensar y repensar las líneas que tiene ante sus ojos. Porque el autor tiene una pluma tan increíblemente sutil y plagada de simbología, en la que cada frase tiene un significado más profundo y diferente de lo que parece a simple vista. A lo largo de toda la lectura me paso, en no pocas ocasiones, que algún comentario o frase me descolocaba porque no entendía su significado total. Tenia que seguir leyendo algunas frases más adelante para captar que es lo que quería decir exactamente y entender todo. Creo que esto hace que la lectura sea, cuanto menos, curiosa. Como he dicho antes, obliga a estar pendiente y puede hacer que te impliques en lo que se cuenta de una manera extraña y pocas veces visita. Pero por otro, también puede ralentizarla, tanta sutileza puede hacer que se pierda de vista lo que es la trama propiamente dicha, y hacer que todo sea bastante frio. A mi, en lo personal, me ha parecido una manera de narrar que llama la atención cuanto menos. Por toda la complejidad que oculta tras su aparente sencillez y el ritmo pausado e introspectivo que tiene priman durante las más de 230 páginas que tiene la novela.

Esta placidez en la escritura se da de la mano con una presentación inicial del entorno y de sus principales actores muy ágil en la que los pequeños detalles lo son todo. La primera parte, que tiene lugar en la ciudad de Florencia, me ha parecido magistralmente escrita de principio a fin, llena de lo que vulgarmente podríamos llamar salseo y con una ambientación de Florencia impecablemente realizada. La segunda parte, en la cual conocemos el hogar de Lucy en Inglaterra y su círculo social y familiar, es quizás más lenta y más sutil, más enfocada en lo que ocurre de manera interna y en la transformación y evolución de los personajes. En ella me pareció que todo iba más lento, y quizás por ello hubo escenas en las que me aburrí un poco. Como dije antes, no hay puntada sin hilo en esta obra. Las criticas hacia la sociedad Eduardiana del momento son una parte esencial de la novela, aparecen constantemente en la misma y son acidas y certeras como dardos. Forster representa nítidamente la forma de vivir y pensar de las clases altas de la Inglaterra del momento, sus escenas costumbristas representan como un cuadro como eran sus vidas y su ideología, lo férreo de sus convenciones y la forma tan implacable como estas moldean sus vidas. De hecho, muchas veces me ha quedado la impresión de que las escenas costumbristas eran tan excesivas y tan enfocadas en la ironía y la critica social, que hacían que el lector perdiera de vista otros aspectos argumentales de la novela. Hay amor en esta novela, se habla de eso y forma parte de su trasfondo, si. Pero lo acompañan muchas más cuestiones. Si hay algo que me ha sorprendido muy gratamente encontrarme en esta novela ha sido las críticas hacia el papel de la mujer dentro de la sociedad, la forma en que Forster defendía su derecho y su capacidad a ser libres y actuar como quisieran, a tener voz propia. Me han sorprendido tan gratamente porque me han parecido de una actualidad rabiosa. Muchos de los diálogos y las ideas en torno a esta cuestión son perfectamente aplicables al momento que vivimos hoy en día y no han perdido vigencia para nada. Y este aspecto tan reivindicativo y adelantado a su época es algo que no esperaba para nada encontrarme en esta novela, y que ha sido una de las cosas que más he disfrutado de la misma.

Forster se toma su tiempo para presentarnos el conflicto entorno al que pivota el argumento, y pone mucho el énfasis en la psicología de sus personajes. A nivel literario, esto me ha parecido uno de los aspectos que más me han gustado. Me ha parecido una maravilla como Forest va desarrollándolos de una forma lenta pero segura. Es que, incluso los caracteres más secundarios están desarrollados con todo lujo de detalles y un realismo psicológico increíble. Nos encontramos ante personajes que son profunda e inequívocamente humanos, con sus luces y sus sombras. Vamos conociéndoles de una manera paulatina, y eso ayuda a preciar mejor su complejidad y la manera en que las convenciones sociales han marcado, de una forma u otra, como actúan y como piensan, y, por ello,acaban por condicionar sus existencias. Si tuviera que señalar cuál es el núcleo emocional de esta novela, diría que sin duda alguna es la evolución de su protagonista, Lucy Honeychurch. Todo su paso por la obra puede definirse como una autentica y pura catarsis que acaba por purificarla de cualquier escrúpulo social y ayudándola a encontrar la felicidad. La evolución de Lucy está detallada a lo largo de toda la novela de una forma detalla y creíble, de manera con la que es fácil empatizar. Es una delicia ir viendo como la convencional y correcta jovencita va aprendiendo poco a poco a dejar atrás las ideas y prejuicios que la han ido atrapando desee su niñez, poco a poco, como una tela de araña. Una tela de la que va lentamente despojándose hasta encontrar su propia voz al aceptar sus deseos más íntimos como parte de ella. Mención especial para el personaje de su prima, Charlotte Bartlett. Es un personaje lleno de matices. Al principio parece ser la típica solterona victoriana destinada a ser la antagonista de la historia, llena de prejuicios, victimista y pacata, formada por convenciones sobre convenciones. Pero cuando menos te lo esperas, la señorita Bartlett demuestra tener sus propias armas y una capacidad de persuasión que le confiere una capacidad de influir en los acontecimientos que nadie le hubiera otorgado en un principio. Y, al mismo tiempo, es un personaje con ideas propias, capaz de sorprender a los propios personajes y al lector cuando menos te lo esperas.

Para acabar, solo decir que con sus luces y sus sombras, aunque no vaya a ser la mejor lectura que he hecho a lo largo del año, “Una Habitación Con Vistas” ha logrado sorprenderme muy gratamente, y con eso me quedo. Quizás el final me haya dejado un poco fría porque me pareció un tanto exagerada y sin sentido la reacción de la mayoría de personajes a la decisión final de Lucy. Una idea típica de una hija del siglo XXI, pese a lo magníficamente que el autor nos transporta a la ideología de las clases altas de la Inglaterra de principios del XX. Pero aún así, creo que es una buena lectura. Es una novela que trata sobre el amor y el costumbrismo, si, pero también sobre la libertad, el crecimiento personal y la aceptación de uno mismo pese a lo que el resto del mundo dicte. Creo que hubiera disfrutado más esta obra si la hubiera leído en otro momento. Otro en el que no estuviera a las puerta de un parón lector y prácticamente no me obligase a leer lo poco que logro hacer cada día. Desde luego, el libro merece mucho la pena, aunque solo sea por lo modernas y adelantadas a su época que son muchas de las ideas que defiende. Espero poder leer mas trabajos de este autor, ya no solo porque les tenga echado el ojo de antes. También porque, a grandes rasgos, me ha dejado muy buen sabor de boca. Especialmente quiero hincarle el diente a los dos libros que mencione al principio.
April 17,2025
... Show More
˗ˏˋ 4 ˎˊ˗ ★
﹂ slight spoilers ahead.

It is undoubtable that E.M. Forester's writing is beautiful. So many scenes and passages had me holding my breath they were so beautiful; I could vividly imagine the locations Forester tenderly created.

However, I struggled to immerse myself in the first, third of 'A Room with a View'. Predominantly, I found Lucy Honeychurch extremely difficult to connect to and found her particularly unlikable at certain points. She was fickle, easily swayed, arrogant at times, whilst also seeming insecure and unsure of herself and opinions. I frequently found myself getting extremely aggravated with her changing opinions towards other characters, especially undeservedly.

Though during the early stages of the book, I hadn't realised this was likely Forester’s intention because as the story progresses, Lucy slowly realises her easily mouldable nature and takes pains to form her own opinions. The second and third acts of this book were much more enjoyable and I flew through them.

The romance within the story painted an interesting perspective on changing attitudes towards femininity, tradition, and modernity; with the two suitors vying for the protagonists' love and attention representing the different stances. Moreover, I appreciated Forester's nuance and willingness to allude that such opinions were not black and white and both perspectives did not exist in a vacuum.

‘A Room with a View’ was a charming read, full of care and love about the coming of age of a young woman, and illustrates the importance of finding a place in the world that is true to you.
April 17,2025
... Show More




E.M. Forster had me sighing with pleasure as I read A Room with a View for the very first (but certainly not the last) time when I was a naive teenager.



I also loved the 1985 film adaptation with Helena Bonham-Carter. (I've watched bits of the 2008 Masterpiece Theatre version starring Elaine Cassidy, but only Sinead Cusack's performance held my interest. The 2008 version was not very good, and the screenwriter changed the ending! Sacrilege!) The 1985 movie had a stellar cast, remained pretty faithful to the novel, and the colours and scenes were glorious!



This novel had everything: upstart tourists in Florence, Italy complaining about not having a room with a view, a bloody altercation in the market square, and two young people destined to be in love despite the odds and their respective social classes.



I think it is time once again for me to dig out my old copy of this fabulously lyrical masterpiece. I loved the grandiose emotions set loose amongst a group of unsuspecting tourists. Highly recommended!

April 17,2025
... Show More
It took me longest to put across and structure my views, for this Classic. Weighing light as a physical copy, but out-weighing many others thematically, this book delineates complex-sensitive issues of religion, passion, respectability and coming-of-age, without rendering itself into a rebellion or a mundane tone for a wee! It subtly highlights – Experience is the most valuable teacher!! As we witness the prime character of Lucy, growing into a female with grit and determination, from a docile young woman, all through her multifold experiences !!

E.M. Forster’s novel, A Room with a view, in written as an omniscient narration, with Lucy Honeychurch (a young woman living in a restrained culture) as the prime-focused character. n  

She is the edifice for the coming-of-age theme, and her journey from adolescence into adulthood is beautifully portrayed. In this process of growing-up, she not only affects her own life, but of the people she stumbles into. Lucy has a challenge to find strength and conviction to claim her own happiness, and comes out of the shackles of timidity and subservience. (I may sound too critical and passionate with my words, but this is the side-effect of this sensible, sensitive and passionate novel!).
n


The novel opens in Florence, Italy, where Lucy along with her chaperone, her cousin, Charlotte Bartlett, has arrived at a Pension. It is here where Lucy's life is set on a spin, and her "coming of age" theme is catalysed and ends up meeting-up many unconventional characters. Charolette , complaining upon not being offered rooms with a prime view, meets a warmly gentleman and his son, George Emerson, who offer to trade their rooms with them, but in a tactless manner.

Charlotte, who subscribes to the rule of social niceties, finding the Emersons “ill-bred”, and for the impropriety of the offer, turns down the offer. The following morning, the two meet, Mr. Beebe, the new vicar from neighbourhood, who convinces them to accept the Emerson's offer without fear of impropriety.

Lucy, as she copes with the repressive Charlotte, the tactless Emersons, and the mildly interfering Mr. Beebe, is described as “bewildered”. Charlotte, in no mood to leave the room, allows Lucy to frolic and explore the city, along with an independent woman, Miss Lavish, whom they met the evening before. Miss Lavish, tells Lucy-
“I will take you by a dear dirty back way, Miss Honeychurch, and if you bring me luck, we shall have an adventure.”


Additionally, she insists Lucy to liberate herself from the travel-guide/ Baedeker and explore Italy by wandering aimlessly.
“I hope we shall soon emancipate you from Baedeker. He does but touch the surface of things. As to the true Italy—he does not even dream of it. The true Italy is only to be found by patient observation.”

Soon giving up on the enjoyable mate, Lucy, all peevish, regretting giving up the Baedeker, attempts finding her way back to the Pension all-alone.

The magical charm of Italy, plays its magic on her, and, instead of acquiring information, she happily puzzles out of the Italian notices, forbading people, introducing their dogs to the church and not to spit in the church, considering the sacredness of the edifice, the church.
Soon Lucy finds herself in close proximity with old Mr. Emerson, as both rush to help a stumbling child. He says , "Here's a mess; a baby hurt, cold and frightened. But what do you expect from a church?" These lines were abominably impertinent for Lucy. The rigid tenets of Christianity are pitted and spouted by Mr. Emerson. Mr. Emerson later in the book, confesses that his resistance to conventional religious beliefs is caused by his own wife's death, and any kind of extreme spiritual dogma can prove dangerous. ( I am neither "in" nor "against" this religious representation by the author, as for me, religion/spirituality is a personal-affair, and the extent to which one follows is again a personal-choice!
April 17,2025
... Show More
One of those classics which I always felt I must have read at some time in the past but apparently had not, so meeting Lucy Honeychurch for the first time was a great pleasure.

A Room with a View is a very enjoyable humorous critique of society, much in the style of Jane Austen. Lucy's travelling partner, Charlotte, could have come straight from an Austen novel. It is also a romance with, of all things, an unexpectedly happy ending. (Spoiler alert there in case you have not read it yet)

I think I have likened it to Austen because it is light hearted and fun, not deep, dark and melodramatic. It is a short book, easy to read and definitely a good choice for anyone who wants lay claim to reading the classics without having to try too hard. I am pleased I have read it at last:)

April 17,2025
... Show More
This was a pleasant surprise - what a lovely, and often funny book. I found Forster's writing delightful; I am reminded of my discovery, decades after leaving school, of the intelligent, insightful writing of Jane Austen. This is one of those rare books about which I think, yes, I'll re-read this in a year or two., and I will certainly be reading more from Forster. I'm so glad that I was made aware of the book by the Merchant-Ivory movie - it only took me 35 years from seeing the movie to making the leap to read the book.
April 17,2025
... Show More
n   “It is fate that I am here," George persisted, "but you can call it Italy if it makes you less unhappy.” n


Now, my art history-excursion to Italy hasn't been as life-changing as the one Lucy took, but it was definitely made better by taking this book with me. A Room with a View is a nice, sweet story about a young woman coming into her own, wherein she learns to stand up for herself, her rights as a woman, and her true love.
Take note, this story was written in 1908, but the lessons that Lucy learns actually translate pretty well to our age, which show the modern and progressive views of its author Edward Forster.

The story is divided into two parts: the first one takes place in the city of Florence, and the second part in London, a few months after the vacation. The first part is filled with great descriptions of the churches and streets of Florence (which brought back memories), and with soft-mocking lines about the upper-class English men and women vacationing in the city. They all walk around with their nose stuck in their guidebook and look down upon the Italian citizens, and admidst them we meet Miss Lucy Honeychurch.

Lucy is a naive, young woman who has an open mind, but who gets restricted by her overbearing older cousin Charlotte, and the stiff customs and social rules of English society. Out of that suffocating group of people old Mr. Emerson and his son George emerge, who live without faith (gasp!), polite words, and who have a strong believe in 'heart over head'.
George especially gives Lucy a lot of trouble when one day in the Italian hills, he gives her a passionate kiss. In distress and disarray over her own feelings, Lucy flees to London, where her boring fiancé Cecil Vyse is waiting for her.

Who to choose? Who is the right man for her? Or a better question: will Lucy allow herself to choose? Because although romance plays a major part in this book, it's main focus is on Lucy, who grows from an unenlightened girl into a mature woman.
For a male writer, Forster is a good understander of the doubts and troubles of a young woman, and with his sharp observations of old English behaviour, he shows his readers how wrong it is to ignore your own feelings.

Still, how nice and refreshing Forster's writing style and main character were, I wasn't blown away by the novel. At the end of the book, Forster tells us that he wrote Part One early in his writing-career, and Part Two much later.
This shows: in Part Two the lines and descriptions are much sharper and accurate. The character's actions make sense: for example, the romance between George and Lucy in Part One came out-of-the-blue and felt unrealistic to me.
You can see in Part Two how Forster has grown as a writer: he isn't writing something nice, he's writing because he has something to say. He wants us to learn something, just like Lucy does.

So if you want to read a short story about a woman discovering her own heart's wishes while living in 19th Century England, this book is certainly one for you. While not perfect, Forster shows with this novel his writing skills, and a promise that his later books will have the same class.
For myself, I enjoyed having "A Room" with me while I visited Rome, Ravenna and Milan, and made me curious to read more of Forster's work.
April 17,2025
... Show More
This coming-of-age story shows Lucy caught between the repressive rules of Victorian society and the more liberal values of the Edwardian age. She is vacationing in Italy, and is exposed to various social classes mixing together and acting in a more relaxed manner than in her English hometown. Lucy is admired by two very different men. Upper class Cecil is a snobbish, bookish man who would be more socially acceptable to marry. The more liberal, but lower class, George values Lucy's ideas, is more sensual, and is drawn to the natural world.

The book is quite humorous as it illustrates the class differences, manners, and customs of the early 20th Century English. Lucy changes as an individual into a more confident woman who has a voice in determining her future. However, her relationship with George seemed a bit rushed. Overall, I found "A Room With A View" to be a light, charming story.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Published in 1908, this is a classical romance novel with humorous satirical bite. Love stories such as this have been told a million times, but the mordant wit with which Edwardian society is drawn is what makes it special. You read it to laugh. You know how it will end right from the start, but who cares? It's fun. It has a sweet, schmaltzy end that will leave you smiling.

I really have nothing else to say......... Critique of Edwardian life told through humor.

I listened to the audiobook narrated by Steven Crossley. Both the novel and the narration are good.
April 17,2025
... Show More
Reread-Started as a 5-star, and absolutely remains a 5-star. I have only one nit to pick, and for me that is pretty amazing. Said nit: Why does Cecil suddenly become human, and not just human but certifiably humble, after Lucy shares her reasons for ending the engagement? Okay, back to work. I do not doubt that I will be thinking about this issue all day despite back-to-back meetings that actually require my focused participation. Full rtf

Back for the review --

It is easy to forget E.M. Forster was a radical, but he most definitely was. He hung out with Virginia Woolf, he was (obliquely) public about being a homosexual at a time when that was a dangerous choice, he championed gender equality, and he rejected the strictures of upper crust British life in theory if not always in practice. His chafing under societal pressures is so central not just to this book, but to his next, the beautiful Howard's End, and the frustrating and touching Maurice. When I read this in my 20's I don't think I realized how revolutionary some of this was. That may be in part because discussion about the rights of workers and women gets mashed up with overly romantic somewhat nauseating messaging about how love is the answer to all things. Anyway, reading this many years later I was astonished by how ahead of its time much of this was. George says that the future must be one in which men and women are equal. This is really quite shocking. More shocking though is the subtle way in which Forster conveys Mr. Beebe's homosexuality, and hints at Cecil's in the early part of the last century. Most shocking perhaps is Lucy's rejection of money and family to run off and find passion with a socialist aesthete. Could anything have been a more clear rejection of the tenets of 1920's British mores? And Forster makes the reader feel good about all this, casting the horrid Charlotte and the effete Cecil as the exemplars of things proper and English and casting the sweet, shy, depressive George and his loving and defiantly innocent father as the exemplars of modern thinking. How could anyone root for Charlotte and Cecil in that matchup?

I know this is primarily a love story, passion over propriety and all that. I love a love story, but honestly reading this as just a love story it doesn't really do it for me. There is, literally, not a single conversation or interaction between George and Lucy that would indicate why he loves her. It is hormones. At least Cecil loved her for her music. George thought her beautiful most definitely and in need of his protection (to save her from ugliness like the blood covered postcards) but they never exchange any other information. Lucy loves him in part for his awkward decency shown in the ceding of his rooms and their view and the postcard incident, and for his honesty and spontaneity in expressing his feelings, and hormones too. There is something there, but George, no. There is not a lot to root for when boiled down to romance. Luckily the book is so much more than that. It is a wonderful and witty slice of life, it is a call for a new day in England, it is an ode to Forster's beloved Italy, and it is a coming of age story (as regards Lucy.) A joy to (re)read. But yeah, I still don't get how the scales fell from Cecil's eyes. I really want to understand that better
April 17,2025
... Show More
"Life is a public performance on the violin, in which you must learn the instrument as you go along."

I read Sarah Winman's "Still Life" in December, and this book was mentioned several times. I had it on my shelf already and decided that winter is a nice time for a trip to Florence, the setting for the first part of this novel.

We meet Lucy, a young woman on her first trip abroad, being chaperoned by her older, unmarried cousin, along with a varied cast of characters staying in the same boarding house. In Italy, a much more cosmopolitan country than provincial England, Lucy finds, or maybe loses herself, to the beauty and freedom she longs for.

Then it's back home to restrictions and rules and conforming to what society expects. "Muddles" ensue. Misunderstandings abound.

This was a lighthearted but thought provoking novel that was a nice interlude in the bleak month of January.
April 17,2025
... Show More
A Room with a View by E. M. Forster

A novel of manners by a master. It is set in England in the early 1900’s -- the Edwardian era. As we are told in the introduction, D. H. Lawrence wrote “About social existence, E. M. Forster knew everything.” Christopher Isherwood called him the expert on “My England.” If we switched the setting to the USA, I would think I was reading Edith Wharton. Or Henry James without the subclauses.



We start off with a young upper-middle class British woman visiting Florence. She is chaperoned by a much older cousin. They are disappointed that their room in the pension does not have the promised view. An older man and his son offer to exchange rooms with them. In a private moment the young man, the son, kisses the young woman. She also has another “adventure:” she witnesses a murder in the street.

Such were Edwardian times that the social complexities of the two women accepting or rejecting this offer of the room, and the young woman’s reaction to the kiss, sets the entire plot in motion for 200 pages. Of course in that era the burden of dealing with that stolen kiss falls entirely on the woman. It affects her relationship with her cousin, her mother, her fiancé back in England, her uncle who is a minister and more.

The first half of the story is set in Italy and the second half back at her home in England. We learn a lot about how the British took great pains to avoid (apparently) “getting contaminated” by Italians! The women stay at a pension run by an English woman; they attend services conducted by a British minister. They have a prescribed list of what must be seen. (There were multiple references to Della Robbia babies, so I looked them up – see picture.)



In a remarkable coincidence, the man who kissed her ends up an immediate neighbor back in England, now friends with her brother and fiancé. The young woman has to wrestle with social propriety, gossip and the choice of ‘doing the right thing’ or following her heart. Her fiancé is controlling and she revolts against him trying to shape her into his opinion of what a woman ‘should be.’ So we can also see the story as a feminist text. Here’s some of what the young woman is up against:

“Why were most big things unladylike? Charlotte [her cousin] had once explained to her why. It was not that ladies were inferior to men; it was that they were different. Their mission was to inspire others to achievement rather than to achieve themselves. Indirectly, by means of tact and a spotless name, a lady could accomplish much. But if she rushed into the fray herself she would first be censured, then despised, and finally ignored. Poems had been written to illustrate this point.”

There is good writing, biting social commentary and humor:

“He seems to see good in everyone. No one would take him for a clergyman.”

Of her mother: “…she doesn’t like anyone to get excited over anything…”

Of the father and son duo: “They must find their level.”

Advice to the young woman from her cousin: “…this our life contains nothing satisfactory.”



E. M. Forster was a gay man, publicly in the closet, although open to his best friends. He lived a long life: 1879 to 1970. A Room with a View is his best-known work according to GR, with about twice as many ratings as either Howards End or A Passage to India. Very early in his life Forster wrote a novel about a gay love affair, Maurice, but it was not published until the year after his death. He must hold the record for being nominated for the Nobel prize but never being awarded one: 16 times. The book was made into a Merchant Ivory film in 1985.

Top photo: the apartment in Florence where the author frequently stayed with his mother, from Wikipedia.
Della Robbia babies from

Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.