Community Reviews

Rating(4.1 / 5.0, 108 votes)
5 stars
37(34%)
4 stars
44(41%)
3 stars
27(25%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
108 reviews
March 26,2025
... Show More
If you ask any first-time reader of ‘Dune’ where he or she thinks the story is likely to go in the follow-up, I doubt if anyone could have predicted ‘Dune Messiah’. It does not work as a book, as there is really no beginning, just a slow (very, very slow and exposition-laden) flat-line of a narrative that gives a slight blip at the overly dramatic ending, which is clearly meant to set-up ‘Children of Dune’ rather than end the second book in any satisfactory fashion. I think ‘Dune Messiah’ is much better-suited as the last part of ‘Dune’ itself, where it would function as a reflective coda deconstructing the consequences of the preceding events.

Clearly, ‘Dune Messiah’ did little to deter the juggernaut that the Dune books would ultimately become. It had about as much effect as poor old Paul trying to avert the jihad and prevent humanity going off the rails of civilisation. Paul spends pretty much the entire book in an existential funk, pondering his increasingly opaque and contradictory visions (much to the frustration of the patient reader, who still has no clue as to what it is he is actually ‘seeing’.)

In a throwaway line so typical of much of the off-hand nature of ‘Dune Messiah’, as if Herbert was deliberately trying to avoid emulating anything that characterised the previous book (and that had made readers fall in love with it), Paul compares notes with fellow ‘emperors’ Genghis Khan and Hitler: “Statistics: at a conservative estimate, I’ve killed sixty-one billion, sterilized ninety planets, completely demoralized five hundred others. I’ve wiped out the followers of forty religions…”

This is well into the book’s last act, and does make the reader raise an eyebrow. Oh, so that’s why Paul is in such a bad mood! Apparently, it is barely 12 years after the ending of ‘Dune’, a rather odd number that I’ve seen bandied about but don’t recall being referenced in the actual text. A vast bureaucracy known as the Qizarate has arisen to administer (and temper) the religious fanaticism that has arisen around Paul.

A pilgrimage route known as the ‘hajj’ is well-established by now, with Arrakis as its ultimate destination, ensuring that the Qizarate’s coffers are always overflowing. Jessica, however, wants nothing to do with this:

Despite the special reverence held for Caladan as the place of Paul’s birth, the Lady Jessica had emphasized her refusal to make her planet a stop on the hajj.
“No doubt my son is an epochal figure of history,” she’d written, “but I cannot see this as an excuse for submitting to a rabble invasion.”


The main plot of ‘Dune Messiah’ concerns the machinations of a ‘fellowship’ of disparate stakeholders drawn into an uneasy alliance with the common purpose of unseating Paul from his throne. Herbert is always very precise about his terminology, and I am sure his reference to a ‘company of conspirators’ is a deliberate inversion of how the term ‘fellowship’ is used in ‘Lord of the Rings’, for example, the other contemporary countercultural novel that ‘Dune’ is often compared with.

While we have the usual suspects like Mohiam and Irulan, it is the new characters and players introduced into the mix that really elevates ‘Dune Messiah’ into something special. If you thought ‘Dune’ could not get any weirder than the quasi-mystical mumbo jumbo of the original, then ‘Dune Messiah’ quickly makes you realise that Herbert still has quite a number of cards up his sleeve (there is a lovely riff on the Dune Tarot set throughout the book.)

Bijaz, described as a dwarf Tleilaxu oracle, is a weird combination of Falstaff from Shakespeare and Chucky from the Child’s Play movies, and would not be out of place in a David Lynch movie. Speaking of Lynch, he obviously nicked Edric the mutated Guild Navigator straight from the pages of ‘Dune Messiah’, turning it into an indelible image in SF cinema.

Herbert seems to be a fan of baroque excess, as evinced by the flamboyant and thoroughly despicable Baron in ‘Dune’. In ‘Dune Messiah’, however, he introduces yet another shadowy player that is potentially even more perverse and grotesque, the Bene Tleilax. Just where the hell did they come from? Despite the ancient proscription on using computers that arose from the Butlerian Jihad, the Tleilaxu is clearly the predecessor of LexCorp, always flirting with dangerous technology:

The Tleilaxu displayed a disturbing lack of inhibitions in what they created. Unbridled curiosity might guide their actions. They boasted they could make anything from the proper human raw material—devils or saints. They sold killer-mentats. They’d produced a killer medic, overcoming the Suk inhibitions against the taking of human life to do it. Their wares included willing menials, pliant sex toys for any whim, soldiers, generals, philosophers, even an occasional moralist.

The best demonstration of the overriding creepiness of the Bene Tleilax, of course, is their presentation of a special gift to Paul, a ghola of Duncan Idaho himself, plucked from the battlefield and reanimated like Frankstein’s monster in an axolotl tank (clearly an inversion of the Fremen death still). Alia of the Knife, whom Herbert often reminds the reader is on the cusp of her womanhood, as if there is a noxious whiff of the Baron still hanging around, is immediately turned on by Hayt, the ghola’s Tleilaxu name. Not subtle at all, Herbert.

Alia attempts to work off some steam by sparring with an updated version of the fighting machine that Paul used on Caladan in ‘Dune’ (this one even has flashing lights.) Except she does so in the nude. Yes, sex rears its head in ‘Dune Messiah’ like Shai Hulud popping up out of the sand. (A lot of SFX ingenuity in Lynch’s 1984 ‘Dune’ went into preventing the sandworms looking like questing penises. Lynch was only partially successful, but that could have been deliberate on his part.)

Herbert reminds us that orgies were a commonplace occurrence in the Fremen sietch (if you recall, Paul first had sex with Chani in the spice-induced orgy after he kills Jamis in single-handed combat.) We even get a quotation from Chapter 3 of The Steersman’s Guild, entitled ‘THE ORGY AS A TOOL OF STATECRAFT’. And as if the Bene Gesserit weren’t in the reader’s bad books already, here they hatch a desperate plot to attempt to get Paul to fuck his sister. “…[T]hat stubborn fool of an Atreides! How could he deny the jewels of posterity within his loins?”

Poor sexually-deprived Irulan wonders idly about Edric the Guild Navigator as a potential fuck buddy, “thinking how odd it would be to mate with such a one.” This, mind you, during the first meeting of the conspirators that opens the book, where her mind should be focusing on the larger issues and not be in the gutter (or Edric’s tank, as it were.) Mohiam fondly calls Lady Jessica a “traitorous bitch”, who in turn is told by Scytale: “You are not a sex object, have never been a sex object, cannot be a sex object.” Ouch. That had to hurt as much as the gom jabbar.

Ah, Scytale. Described as a ‘Jadacha hermaphrodite’, he (pronouns weren’t as advanced in 1969 when ‘Dune Messiah’ was published), can assume either sex at will, and is commonly referred to as a Face Dancer. “For the present, I am a man,” he declares. The reader is not convinced, because there is something even oilier about Scytale than that uber-creep the Baron. It is especially uncomfortable because Herbert seems to signpost a latent effeminacy or sexual ambiguity in Scytale as being fundamentally wrong. It is clear that a lot of the convoluted sexual politics of ‘Dune’, wrapped up as it were in Herbert’s own subconscious biases towards misogyny and homophobia, begin to, er, come into play in ‘Dune Messiah’.

‘Dune Messiah’ is the literary equivalent of a ‘spice blow’, which is the result of immense pressure building up within a pre-spice mass deep within the sands of Arrakis. (Of course, this is what killed Liet Kynes when he rather stupidly went to lay on top of one in ‘Dune’.) At only about a third of the length of the original novel, so much is packed into ‘Dune Messiah’ that a spice blow is inevitable.

Herbert’s writing is always at its most delicate and evocative when he turns to Arrakis itself, and ‘Dune Messiah’ is no exception. He clearly has a deep and abiding love for the desert world he has created, which is a tabula rasa of the natural world despoiled by humanity and its increasingly dramatic and uncontrollable impact on our own planet. There is a wonderful scene near the end when Chani returns to her sietch to give birth (and precipitate the crisis that launches the next book in the sequence):

Windblown sand whipped at her, reddened her cheeks. She glanced over her shoulder at the frightful band of dust across the sky. The desert beneath the storm had taken on a tawny, restless appearance as though dune waves beat on a tempest shore the way Paul had once described a sea. She hesitated, caught by a feeling of the desert’s transience. Measured against eternity, this was no more than a caldron. Dune surf thundered against cliffs.
The storm out there had become a universal thing for her—all the animals hiding from it...nothing left of the desert but its own private sounds: blown sand scraping along rock, a wind-surge whistling, the gallop of a boulder tumbled suddenly from its hill—then! somewhere out of sight, a capsized worm thumping its idiot way aright and slithering off to its dry depths.


As far as I recall, this is the only worm sighting in the entire book, apart from a side plot involving a bunch of Fremen traitors capturing a small maker to take it off-planet and start the spice cycle on a similar world. Ah, but they don’t know about the sand plankton that is such an integral part of the sandworm lifecycle, which is probably what George Lucas had in mind when he started tinkering with the role of midichlorians as an essential component of the Star Wars universe.

Herbert continues:

Sietch odors assaulted her nostrils. The place was a ferment of nasal memories—the warren closeness of bodies, rank esters of the reclamation stills, familiar food aromas, the flinty burning of machines at work...and through it all, the omnipresent spice: melange everywhere.
She took a deep breath. “Home.”


Extraordinary. And it is exactly as if the reader him- or herself has returned home, to the deep desert of Arrakis where it all began. Chani’s viewpoint is reflected in Paul’s own perspective:

Ugly, barren land! He imagined it sun-soaked and monstrous with heat, a place of sandslides and the drowned darkness of dust pools, blowdevils unreeling tiny dunes across the rocks, their narrow bellies full of ochre crystals. But it was a rich land, too: big, exploding out of narrow places with vistas of storm-trodden emptiness, rampart cliffs and tumbledown ridges.
All it required was water...and love.
Life changed those irascible wastes into shapes of grace and movement, he thought. That was the message of the desert. Contrast stunned him with realization. He wanted to turn to the aides massed in the sietch entrance, shout at them: If you need something to worship, then worship life—all life, every last crawling bit of it! We’re all in this beauty together!


Yes, I know that this is Herbert at his most ‘hippy dippy’ – and it is certainly no surprise that a novel as batshit crazy as this would have such a deeply Age of Aquarius moment in it. But, for me, this is still one of the most remarkable, and memorable, passages in the entire saga. It is the ‘Circle of Life’, writ boldly on the ever-shifting sands of Dune.
March 26,2025
... Show More
„Империите не страдат от липса на цели по време на своето създаване. Едва когато се утвърдят, целите им изчезват, заменени от мъгляви ритуали.“


Действието в „Месията на Дюн“ се пренася около 12 години след събитията от предната книга. Франк Хърбърт умело критикува месианския стил на управление, а и отново предизвиква размисли по разнообразни теми, заплитайки още вълнуващи интриги на Аракис! Поддържането на империя се оказва далеч по-сложна и противоречива дейност от нейното създаване...

Пол Атреидски се е превърнал в император, който управлява основно чрез своята пророческа дарба... Оженил се е за принцеса Ирулан, но живее с любимата си Чани, а и още не е ясно кой ще бъде наследник на трона. В такава атмосфера в монархията логично се развихрят политически заговори и основните персонажи са въвлечени в сериозни опасности...





„С други думи, предсказанието е естествено следствие от вълната на настоящето. Разбирате ли, то идва в облика на природно явление. Но подобна сила не може да се използва от позицията на предварително избрани цели и задачи. Нима понесеният от вълните кораб знае къде отива? Пророкът не знае що е причина и следствие.“


„Сърцата на всички хора обитават една и съща пустош.“


„— Изгубили сме ясната и простичка мелодия на живота. Щом не може да се прибере, победи, посочи или натрупа, значи няма полза от него.
Засегната, тя бе възразила:
— Не това имах предвид.
— Ах, безценна моя — утешително бе изрекъл той, — толкова сме богати на пари и бедни на живот...“
March 26,2025
... Show More
3.5 ☆

”They are not mad. They're trained to believe, not to know. Belief can be manipulated. Only knowledge is dangerous.”

with this being a lot shorter than book one, the pacing is a lot faster and things move almost at a break neck speed. i found the focus on women getting pregnant to produce heirs a bit excessive, especially for Irulan and the Bene Gesserit’s plans for her as Paul’s betrothed. Paul was going through it and i can’t believe he lost his eyesight, though he still has the other “sight” due to his weird messiah abilities. the thing that really threw me was everything to do with Chani cause what do you mean SHE DIED IN CHILDBIRTH?!
March 26,2025
... Show More
مسیحای تلماسه رو میشه دور اندازی از مهدی موعود اسلام هم تلقی کرد، یک پیشگویی از آینده
March 26,2025
... Show More
I really liked Frank Herbert's classic science fiction novel Dune when I first read it a few months ago --so much so that I named it one of the best books I read that year. But upon finally getting around to the sequel, Dune Messiah I'm pretty disappointed. It's really boring.

Don't get me wrong, I can see some of the impressive literary clockwork that Herbert assembles in the book. Where Dune told the story of Paul Muad’Dib's rise to the Emperor, controller of the universe's only source of the coveted super spice "melange," and general badass dude, Messiah tells the story of his downfall. It also follows through on one of the more interesting concepts introduced in the first book: Paul's spice-induced ability to foresee the eventual species-wide extinction of humans and the hard choices he has to make in order to steer history towards a lesser evil. Indeed, Messiah fast forwards to a point where Paul's fanatic followers have propagated a holy war that has destroyed entire planets and left over 60 billion people dead in just a few years. By those measures, Paul is the worst monster history has ever created, yet he has to bear the mostly private burden of knowing that he's killing all those people to save the race as a whole while simultaneously trying to outmaneuver his political opponents and crafty assassins. Angst!

The problem I have with Messiah is that it suffers acutely from a kind of talking head syndrome. It's not until the back sixth or so of the book that anything interesting happens. Dune had sword fights, skirmishes, Paul and his mother tromping around the deadly desert of Arakis meeting and learning about the Fremen, and all other kinds of adventures. Messiah devotes literally dozens of pages at a time to sitting in a room listening to conspirators talk to each other. And then talking about what the talking means. And then thinking about what the talking about the talking means. It's terrible and jarring to see how Herbert has switched gears so abruptly from fascinating adventure and world building to stark exposition and naval gazing.

Not that some of the ideas aren't interesting. The way that Paul must grapple with his precognition and how he has to grasp at things to try and leave humanity on the path to survival in the wake of his inevitable fall is a complex and fascinating idea, for one. And I liked the idea of how his strengths are the things that ultimately do him in --sometimes literally. It's just that I wish Herbert had found ways to make this story less tedious in its execution.

Is the third book any better? I'm on the fence at this point.
March 26,2025
... Show More
n  I have extremely mixed feelings on this book.n

It's probably a 3.5 star book for me. I really liked some parts. I enjoyed the returning characters and some of the new ones. But it was just really, really sad. As in, I feel like it took a little piece of my heart with me when it ended.

So, I really can't give it above three-and-a-half. But it wasn't bad. But it wasn't as good as the first...

My Dune Review

(Connect with me.)
March 26,2025
... Show More
دراپ. نخونید!
زیبایی و جذابیت جلد اول رو توی ذهنتون خراب نکنید.
March 26,2025
... Show More
Struggling with a rating here but ultimately the positives outweigh the negatives. The writing is stunning. I loved the politics. The ending was quite abrupt and also the book felt really short. I read reviews before I started saying to read children of dune immediately after and that's what I'll be doing. But overall I'm in love with the Dune universe
March 26,2025
... Show More
After a slow start, Dune Messiah develops into a chess match between Paul and those conspiring against him. The narrative is disrupted by musings on power and the difficulty of appreciating the present when you know the future.  Nevertheless, I was sad when it ended.
March 26,2025
... Show More
“Oh, no. Even if I died now, my name would still lead them. When I think of the Atreides name tied to this religious butchery …”
“But you’re the Emperor! You’ve—”
“I’m a figurehead. When godhead’s given, that’s the one thing the so-called god no longer controls.” A bitter laugh shook him. He sensed the future looking back at him out of dynasties not even dreamed. He felt his being cast out, crying, unchained from the rings of fate—only his name continued. “I was chosen,” he said. “Perhaps at birth … certainly before I had much say in it. I was chosen.”
“Then un-choose,” she said.
His arm tightened around her shoulder. “In time, beloved. Give me yet a little time.”
Unshed tears burned his eyes.


“Very good, Stil.” Paul glanced at the reels in Korba’s hands. Korba stood with them as though he wished he could drop them and flee. “Statistics: at a conservative estimate, I’ve killed sixty-one billion, sterilized ninety planets, completely demoralized five hundred others. I’ve wiped out the followers of forty religions which had existed since—” …
“My Liege makes a joke,” Korba said, voice trembling. “The Jihad has brought ten thousand worlds into the shining light of—”
  


Introduction

Frank Herbert stated himself why did he specifically seek out to write this story:

"The bottom line of the Dune trilogy is: beware of heroes. Much better [to] rely on your own judgment and your own mistakes." [ He wrote in 1985:]"Dune was aimed at this whole idea of the infallible leader because my view of history says that mistakes made by a leader (or made in a leader's name) are amplified by the numbers who follow without question." ( source other sites)
“Don’t trust leaders to always be right.” … I think that our society was formed on a mistrust for government, and we seem to have lost that distrust of government. I kid around and say my favourite president of recent years has been Richard Nixon because he taught us to distrust government.”


In Dune, he builds up the hero or the “Chosen One” which is Paul Muad’dib, however through the appendix of Dune a certain twist appeared. Paul's creation wasn’t due to chance but because of selective breeding by decades and decades of planning by the Bene Gesserit. They didn’t intend for Paul to become the Kwisatz Hadarach, but for Jessica to have a daughter to produce one. Regardless this is all setting the stage and basically the aftermath of this real question.

Frank was deconstructing the heroes’ journey or the chosen one trope. Our hero isn’t so beloved, some of the people are even nostalgic about the days of the old emperor. Throughout the text, we have not really witnessed it, but we have been told of the destruction he has caused … and the prophesied ‘Jihad’ is underway. To get out of the way, this novel is quite obviously a bridge novel between Dune and Children of Dune. I do think it ended in the right place but I do believe they could have been some significantly expansions to flesh out the characters more and their actions. In this review, they are some repetitions from my previous Dune review, because its strength is the strength of this novel while also having some of its weaker aspects.

Writing

If you have read my Dune review in the writing section, I don’t know what I would cut because the same is applied here.

The Book is observed from a third-person omniscient perspective.

•You see a more critical standpoint
•Distant…
•He opens a new scene or “chapter” by quoting epigrams in the manner of a historian …
•All these aspects can be referred over there.

That’s not necessarily a criticism, just the writing strengths from that book are carried here. What is fundamentally different is the plot. The first novel is a hero’s journey, it's an epic adventure where oddly the action is rarely at the forefront but carried because of the other aspects. This is largely a character study with not much going on in terms of the plot (if you really break it down). There are a lot of political aspects to it, but generally, if you break down the plot not a whole chunk really occurs. How Frank develops a religion is damn interesting because this book makes you question its formation of it in real life. These aspects play a vigorous part in Alia and Paul's development.

Alita says it best herself

“here was only a distant feeling of anger deep within her at the obvious thoughts in the attendants’ minds. It was a product of the damned religious mystery. She and her brother could not be people. They had to be something more. The Bene Gesserit had seen to that by manipulating Atreides ancestry. Their mother had contributed to it by thrusting them onto the path of witchery.” ( Dune Messiah).



The number of stressors in their lives cannot be understated because they must play a role … one they may not fundamentally like, however, it’s a role they must play. Spoilers of the book


“Duncan, don’t let me go,” she whispered.
“Sleep,” he said. “Don’t fight it.”
“I must … I must. He’s the bait in his own trap. He’s the servant of power and terror. Violence … deification is a prison enclosing him. He’ll lose … everything. It’ll tear him apart.”
“You speak of Paul?”
“They drive him to destroy himself,” she gasped, arching her back. “Too much weight, too much grief. They seduce him away from love.” She sank back to the bed. “They’re creating a universe where he won’t permit himself to live.”
“Who is doing this?”
“He is! Ohhh, you’re so dense. He’s part of the pattern. And it’s too late … too late … too late …”  

Similar to Dune, it rewards several rereads to understand some of the nuance and depth to it. Not that you can’t understand it in your first read as I think I did. However, I do see … myself reflecting differently if I revisit this novel.

Themes

Same as the Dune review however just exploring those aspects and this time questioning governance and leadership. However, I do like to say I enjoy how Frank recontextualises something simple like water. It's more civilisation view upon it, after 11 years seeing the growth or wanting the old days to return. One element that really resonated with me is from old freeman spoilers just in case


“I immersed myself in that sea,” Farok said, looking down at the water creatures worked into the tiles of his floor. “One man sank beneath that water … another man arose from it. I felt that I could remember a past which had never been. I stared around me with eyes which could accept anything … anything at all. I saw a body in the water—one of the defenders we had slain. There was a log nearby supported on that water, a piece of a great tree. I can close my eyes now and see that log. It was black on one end from a fire. And there was a piece of cloth in that water—no more than a yellow rag … torn, dirty. I looked at all these things and I understood why they had come to this place. It was for me to see them.
  

I wish we got more insight like this. Seeing these perspectives though not really plot-related. there would have a thematic weight which would further add to the story itself.

Worldbuilding

Hmmm like old just expanded … however, I do honestly think more expansion of this aspect could have easily been conducted. With a certain framing device, spoilers for book 2
seeing Jessica's view in Caladan, it's really one aspect that Frank never really delves into. I wanted that contrast I know their trees, land, water and all that aspect, but can I see more civilisation why it is so distant. I do understand the isolated view but it's frustrating as she was one of the main protagonists in the first novel it's truly a shame that she never got the spotlight she deserved. Because seeing her view and how it would contrast with Paul, it would have been interesting so we view it as the original writing style see from a more critical standpoint of the religion that is Muad’dib. It wouldn’t add more worldbuilding but it also complement the character writing and reinforces certain views in interesting ways also it would be appropriate as a bridge novel.


Characters

Duncan Idaho – I do genuinely love Frank's exploration of this character and giving him depth. In the original, I could care less about him. He just died really. However, as a Ghoula brings a lot of interesting developments, especially in how relates to the ending. I appreciate someone who can talk a bit down on Paul and Alia so they more human interaction. But i do believe they some missed opportunity with Duncan is that no one really cares about him in the first book. We have just been told about their relationship without really seeing it.


Paul Atreides – I already stated my view of him above … all I will say the exploration of his character is truly interesting to witness.  the beginning and end of a man, a legend and religious figure. After he lost his eyes that was one of the more fascinating aspects completely distancing himself to everyone he loves. He must follow a certain path at the exact precise moment, or he won’t be able to see anything. Once Chani passed away delivering the twins … he lost sight of that path and he truly was unable to see. I do wish I saw more inner turmoil of Paul however when you examine the text it was pretty much the beginning of the novel; he saw these events happening thousands of time. So, him not having a completely strong reaction, to begin with, is quite natural. So it's not really a critique and something that would reward rereads.


Alia Atreides - She is a tragic character I stated a few my views of her above but I will expand some aspects. Little aspects like this


“I see … my child,” she whispered.”
Thinking of … forced her at times to think of Paul as a son to whom she had given birth. The capsule-complex of oneness could present her own father as a lover. Ghost shadows cavorted in her mind, people of possibility.”



She views Paul as a brother but also as son this is an important distinction, which is truly tragic when you examine her character.  I cannot imagine what would you go through in being born in a similar vein to Alia. She ironically lived out several lifetimes with Reverend Mothers in her, but at the same time, she truly hasn’t which is why when she processes information it’s so confusing to her.


Flaws


Lack of description: This isn’t necessarily about the worldbuilding and detail of it. I would be great to have more descriptions so you can visually see it better ... but I more talking about the characters. From the first two books I realise some of my criticism of the series it’s the tell and not show approach. For being a character study this novel and not really about the plot ( compared to Dune) its hurts some of its characters. Primarily Chani and Irulan … which without going to spoilers they certain bridge sequences which are implied but not shown. This is not even a small variable this is a significant turnaround. These two have the most potential mainly Irulan they implied depth, but in cases like this showing is more important than merely telling us. I am fine with this novel and its ending its was the appropriate place if u saw my worldbuilding section I will stand by that statement. This doesn’t need to be a giant book however it could have accomplished a lot more in terms of depth with extra maybe 100 pages or so. Ironically, I said the same thing for Dune. It being concise is strength however can be detrimental at least how I view it as they so much potential that ain’t being tapped. Action well … they barely any action to critique but same thing book 1 can be applied here in my review.


Conclusion

Hmmm I say like my original review

“In terms of my flaws, I feel like this probably be reduced in rereads and probably sequel will enhance the strength of this novel. I’ve pretty much said everything I feel like saying it’s a fantastic novel.” ( Dune 1 review) … I will rate this a straight 8/10 it’s a great novel but as a sequel Ummm kinda you want a bit more but I am truly a huge fan of this novel. Just wanted the extra 100-150 pages to flesh out certain aspects. This definitely a weaker book to Dune however that’s not to discredit this book, as it has a lot of merits. This is not what people in 1969 wanted, but it's an appropriate follow up to a classic. I am curious how this trilogy will end … anyways people who didn’t go past the first book well READ MESSIAH



“I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain.”

8.5/10
March 26,2025
... Show More
The sequel to Dune sees Paul Atreides reign over a galactic empire after winning a holy war. A number of powerful co-conspirators come together to try and bring him down, and he, himself, is still intent on seeing the future he has foreseen, not happen. Classic sci-fi from Frank Herbert albeit a bit underwhelming for me! 5 out of 12
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.