...
Show More
"The point of course was not that dams or any of man's efforts to alter or improve the world about him were mistakes in themselves. The point was, if man, for any reason, drastically alters the natural order, setting in motion whole series of chain reactions, then he had better know what he is doing. In the case of the South Fork dam, men in charge of rebuilding it, those who are supposed to be experts in such matters, had not been expert, either in their understanding of what they did, or, equally important, in the possible consequences of what they did.
"What is more, the members of the club and most of Johnstown, went along on the assumption, that the people who were responsible for their safety were behaving responsibly. And this was the second great mistake. The club people took it for granted, that the men who rebuilt the dam, the men reputed to be expert in such matters, handled the job properly. They apparently never questioned the professed wisdom of the experts, nor bothered to look critically at what the experts were doing. It was a human enough error, even though someone with the minimum of horse sense, could, if he had taken a moment to think about it, have realized that an earth dam without any means of controlling the amount of water it contained, was not a very good idea.
"The responsibility was in the hands of someone else, in short, and since that someone else appeared to be ever so much more qualified to make the necessary decisions and pass judgment, then why should not such things be left to him."
I see in this conclusion an application to many other situations we face in our modern day. Might we simply trust those within our government to make long lasting changes that lead in fact to a series of interactions that could affect us in many ways yet unforeseen? Are this in charge really so expert they can foresee the iatrogenic effects that may result from their decisions? If we ever allow those who lead us to go unquestioned, we may reap similar consequences to those experienced in Johnstown, disastrous destruction.
"What is more, the members of the club and most of Johnstown, went along on the assumption, that the people who were responsible for their safety were behaving responsibly. And this was the second great mistake. The club people took it for granted, that the men who rebuilt the dam, the men reputed to be expert in such matters, handled the job properly. They apparently never questioned the professed wisdom of the experts, nor bothered to look critically at what the experts were doing. It was a human enough error, even though someone with the minimum of horse sense, could, if he had taken a moment to think about it, have realized that an earth dam without any means of controlling the amount of water it contained, was not a very good idea.
"The responsibility was in the hands of someone else, in short, and since that someone else appeared to be ever so much more qualified to make the necessary decisions and pass judgment, then why should not such things be left to him."
I see in this conclusion an application to many other situations we face in our modern day. Might we simply trust those within our government to make long lasting changes that lead in fact to a series of interactions that could affect us in many ways yet unforeseen? Are this in charge really so expert they can foresee the iatrogenic effects that may result from their decisions? If we ever allow those who lead us to go unquestioned, we may reap similar consequences to those experienced in Johnstown, disastrous destruction.