...
Show More
First Read 1978
Second Reading 1999
Third Reading 2023
I have reviewed the three volumes that comprise The Lord of the Rings — The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers, and The Return of the King — each separately. This review of the work entire is to share my thoughts on where and how this work fits into our literary culture.
Tolkien’s cultural impact is undeniable. The Lord of the Rings became a touchstone to the Flower Power generation, when many a hippie scrawled the graffiti “Frodo Lives!” as a tribute to their obsession. In the 1970s, Tolkien’s work was behind the boom of heroic fantasy as a genre publishing phenomenon, as publishers rushed to find Tolkien clones to feed an insatiable market. Ralph Bakshi’s animated 1978 film, The Lord of the Rings, though it made a profit, disappointed fans, who had to wait for Peter Jackson’s trilogy of live action films a generation later before Hollywood elevated Tolkien’s work into a fully realized and lasting pop culture megalith.
What is often overlook about The Lord of the Rings, rather, is its literary impact. Tolkien was an officer in The Great War, and was clearly affected by that dramatic conflict. Yet he is rarely mentioned alongside the generation of writers who were shaped by that war and went on to shape 20th century literature. Hemingway, Cummings, Dos Passos, are all widely seen as being shaped by their experiences in the First World War, and their breaking away from the old romantic forms of literature is viewed as pivotal in shaping what literature would become in the 20th century. Tolkien’s war experience sent him on another path. He reinvented the romantic forms rather than abandoning them. The mythological epic that he created reimagined the old forms, keeping the romantic tradition alive and refreshed in a generation that had largely turned away from it in favor of Modernism. Though rarely acknowledged in academia, Tolkien rescued the romantic tradition and passed it on for the enjoyment of the children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren of the generation who abandoned it.
Second Reading 1999
Third Reading 2023
I have reviewed the three volumes that comprise The Lord of the Rings — The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers, and The Return of the King — each separately. This review of the work entire is to share my thoughts on where and how this work fits into our literary culture.
Tolkien’s cultural impact is undeniable. The Lord of the Rings became a touchstone to the Flower Power generation, when many a hippie scrawled the graffiti “Frodo Lives!” as a tribute to their obsession. In the 1970s, Tolkien’s work was behind the boom of heroic fantasy as a genre publishing phenomenon, as publishers rushed to find Tolkien clones to feed an insatiable market. Ralph Bakshi’s animated 1978 film, The Lord of the Rings, though it made a profit, disappointed fans, who had to wait for Peter Jackson’s trilogy of live action films a generation later before Hollywood elevated Tolkien’s work into a fully realized and lasting pop culture megalith.
What is often overlook about The Lord of the Rings, rather, is its literary impact. Tolkien was an officer in The Great War, and was clearly affected by that dramatic conflict. Yet he is rarely mentioned alongside the generation of writers who were shaped by that war and went on to shape 20th century literature. Hemingway, Cummings, Dos Passos, are all widely seen as being shaped by their experiences in the First World War, and their breaking away from the old romantic forms of literature is viewed as pivotal in shaping what literature would become in the 20th century. Tolkien’s war experience sent him on another path. He reinvented the romantic forms rather than abandoning them. The mythological epic that he created reimagined the old forms, keeping the romantic tradition alive and refreshed in a generation that had largely turned away from it in favor of Modernism. Though rarely acknowledged in academia, Tolkien rescued the romantic tradition and passed it on for the enjoyment of the children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren of the generation who abandoned it.