...
Show More
If you love words and the quirky nuances of the English language, you will savor this book. Bryson applies wit and wisdom to every clause. He clears up sticky issues of grammar and syntax likely to bother even the most accomplished writers, and points out shades of meaning that are important but not at all obvious. A few things I learned -
1. "Comic" is something intended to be funny; "comical" is funny whether intended or not.
2. Stalemates don't end. A stalemate is the end, whereas a standoff or deadlock can end.
3. "Meticulous" has a negative connotation of being excessively careful. "Scrupulous" or "painstaking" might be better choices.
Not sure about when to use "who" versus "whom"? "Shall" versus "will"? "If I were ..." versus "If I was ..."? "Compare with" versus "compare to"? Bryson clears it all up.
Another area he addresses is troublesome names of proper nouns. For example -
1. "Notes from Underground", not "Notes from the Underground".
2. Big Ben is the bell, not the clock.
3. Leonardo is the preferred second reference for Leonardo da Vinci.
4. "Finnegans Wake" has no apostrophe.
5. National Institutes of Health - plural.
His clarifications on spelling, though few in number, were amazingly well selected. These, for example, were news to me -
1. Expressible
2. "Hear, hear!", not "Here, here!"
3. Just deserts (not desserts)
4. Ukulele
Reading this book will help you write with greater precision and clarity. At 240 pages, it's surprisingly comprehensive and every bit as good as a desk side reference as The Associated Press Stylebook and Briefing on Media Law
1. "Comic" is something intended to be funny; "comical" is funny whether intended or not.
2. Stalemates don't end. A stalemate is the end, whereas a standoff or deadlock can end.
3. "Meticulous" has a negative connotation of being excessively careful. "Scrupulous" or "painstaking" might be better choices.
Not sure about when to use "who" versus "whom"? "Shall" versus "will"? "If I were ..." versus "If I was ..."? "Compare with" versus "compare to"? Bryson clears it all up.
Another area he addresses is troublesome names of proper nouns. For example -
1. "Notes from Underground", not "Notes from the Underground".
2. Big Ben is the bell, not the clock.
3. Leonardo is the preferred second reference for Leonardo da Vinci.
4. "Finnegans Wake" has no apostrophe.
5. National Institutes of Health - plural.
His clarifications on spelling, though few in number, were amazingly well selected. These, for example, were news to me -
1. Expressible
2. "Hear, hear!", not "Here, here!"
3. Just deserts (not desserts)
4. Ukulele
Reading this book will help you write with greater precision and clarity. At 240 pages, it's surprisingly comprehensive and every bit as good as a desk side reference as The Associated Press Stylebook and Briefing on Media Law