...
Show More
I got interested in philosophy of the mind, and picked this book out at random from a pile of Dennett books. I was a bit surprised, and disappointed, when I realized that it's more a collection of short stories, not a scientific publication. I decided to read it anyways.
Ironically, it turned out to be easily the best collection of short stories I've ever read. There are some good scientific articles in this book, too, but the fiction was really the positive surprise to me.
The articles include legends of the field, such as "What is it like to be a bat", and the original articles on the Turing test, and Searle's Chinese room.
The fiction includes Borges, Lem, and others. I'm not sure if I've read Lem before, but his stories in this collection are really good. In my opinion, though, it's Raymond Smullyan who steals the show.
Ironically, it turned out to be easily the best collection of short stories I've ever read. There are some good scientific articles in this book, too, but the fiction was really the positive surprise to me.
The articles include legends of the field, such as "What is it like to be a bat", and the original articles on the Turing test, and Searle's Chinese room.
The fiction includes Borges, Lem, and others. I'm not sure if I've read Lem before, but his stories in this collection are really good. In my opinion, though, it's Raymond Smullyan who steals the show.