The Mind’s I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul

... Show More
Brilliant, shattering, mind-jolting, The Mind's I is a searching, probing cosmic journey of the mind that goes deeply into the problem of self and self-consciousness as anything written in our time. From verbalizing chimpanzees to scientific speculations involving machines with souls, from the mesmerizing, maze-like fiction of Borges to the tantalizing, dreamlike fiction of Lem and Princess Ineffable, her circuits glowing read and gold, The Mind's I opens the mind to the Black Box of fantasy, to the windfalls of reflection, to new dimensions of exciting possibilities.

"Ever since David Hume declared in the 18th century that the Self is only a heap of perceptions, the poor Ego has been in a shaky conditions indeed...Mind and consciousness becomes dispensable items in our accounts of reality, ghosts in the bodily machine...Yet there are indications here and there that the tide may be tuming...and the appearance of The Mind's I, edited by Douglas R. Hofstadter and Daniel C. Dennett, seems a welcome sign of change." William Barrett, The New York Times Book Review

512 pages, Paperback

First published January 1,1981

About the author

... Show More
Douglas Richard Hofstadter is an American scholar of cognitive science, physics, and comparative literature whose research focuses on consciousness, thinking and creativity. He is best known for his book Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid, first published in 1979, for which he was awarded the 1980 Pulitzer Prize for general non-fiction.

Hofstadter is the son of Nobel Prize-winning physicist Robert Hofstadter. Douglas grew up on the campus of Stanford University, where his father was a professor. Douglas attended the International School of Geneva for a year. He graduated with Distinction in Mathematics from Stanford in 1965. He spent a few years in Sweden in the mid 1960s. He continued his education and received his Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Oregon in 1975.

Hofstadter is College of Arts and Sciences Distinguished Professor of Cognitive Science at Indiana University in Bloomington, where he directs the Center for Research on Concepts and Cognition which consists of himself and his graduate students, forming the "Fluid Analogies Research Group" (FARG). He was initially appointed to the Indiana University's Computer Science Department faculty in 1977, and at that time he launched his research program in computer modeling of mental processes (which at that time he called "artificial intelligence research", a label that he has since dropped in favor of "cognitive science research"). In 1984, he moved to the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, where he was hired as a professor of psychology and was also appointed to the Walgreen Chair for the Study of Human Understanding. In 1988 he returned to Bloomington as "College of Arts and Sciences Professor" in both Cognitive Science and Computer Science, and also was appointed Adjunct Professor of History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Comparative Literature, and Psychology, but he states that his involvement with most of these departments is nominal.

In April, 2009, Hofstadter was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a Member of the American Philosophical Society.
Hofstadter's many interests include music, visual art, the mind, creativity, consciousness, self-reference, translation and mathematics. He has numerous recursive sequences and geometric constructions named after him.

At the University of Michigan and Indiana University, he co-authored, with Melanie Mitchell, a computational model of "high-level perception" — Copycat — and several other models of analogy-making and cognition. The Copycat project was subsequently extended under the name "Metacat" by Hofstadter's doctoral student James Marshall. The Letter Spirit project, implemented by Gary McGraw and John Rehling, aims to model the act of artistic creativity by designing stylistically uniform "gridfonts" (typefaces limited to a grid). Other more recent models are Phaeaco (implemented by Harry Foundalis) and SeqSee (Abhijit Mahabal), which model high-level perception and analogy-making in the microdomains of Bongard problems and number sequences, respectively.

Hofstadter collects and studies cognitive errors (largely, but not solely, speech errors), "bon mots" (spontaneous humorous quips), and analogies of all sorts, and his long-time observation of these diverse products of cognition, and his theories about the mechanisms that underlie them, have exerted a powerful influence on the architectures of the computational models developed by himself and FARG members.

All FARG computational models share certain key principles, among which are: that human thinking is carried out by thousands of independent small actions in parallel, biased by the concepts that are currently activated; that activation spreads from activated concepts to less activated "neighbor concepts"; that there is a "mental temperature" that regulates the degree of randomness in the parallel activity; that promising avenues tend to be explored more rapidly than unpromising ones. F

Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 100 votes)
5 stars
34(34%)
4 stars
36(36%)
3 stars
30(30%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
100 reviews All reviews
April 16,2025
... Show More
I got interested in philosophy of the mind, and picked this book out at random from a pile of Dennett books. I was a bit surprised, and disappointed, when I realized that it's more a collection of short stories, not a scientific publication. I decided to read it anyways.

Ironically, it turned out to be easily the best collection of short stories I've ever read. There are some good scientific articles in this book, too, but the fiction was really the positive surprise to me.

The articles include legends of the field, such as "What is it like to be a bat", and the original articles on the Turing test, and Searle's Chinese room.

The fiction includes Borges, Lem, and others. I'm not sure if I've read Lem before, but his stories in this collection are really good. In my opinion, though, it's Raymond Smullyan who steals the show.
April 16,2025
... Show More
Well, at least I don't have to go further to investigate Richard Dawkins silly book, "The Selfish Gene", as it was excerpted in these pages. And, what's more, I finally understand the origins of the meretricious word 'meme', which is frequently used today by society's digital architects, who tend to be witless wonders. Yuck!
April 16,2025
... Show More
Сборник эссе о том, что значит быть разумным, что значит быть человеком, что значит быть конкретным человеком, собой. Составители сборника держат в голове сравнение человека и машины и ищут ответ на вопрос, есть ли в человеке душа или в нем только "колесики и винтики". Сборник выглядит наполненным умом и состраданием к человеческим метаниям -- и через 35 лет после появления это все еще работа, которую стоит читать.
April 16,2025
... Show More
This classic anthology of cognitive science introduces articles and excerpts by some of the last century's most remarkable thinkers. From the intricate prose of J. L. Borges to the groundbreaking article of A. Turing, "The Mind's I" attacks the fundamental mind-body problem from radically different angles. Is the consciousness hardware or software? Where is the sense of "self" located spatially? Is it a feature attributed solely to cellular organic beings, or can it be maintained in other mediums? Do conscious beings really possess free-will, or is it merely an illusion? After all, aren't we humans super-complex biological machines?
Although not a scientific work in any way, "The Mind's I" is designed to constantly amuse the reader with fresh views on the subject. Each piece is followed by the authors' comments under sections called "Reflections". These comments provide valuable insight into, sometimes confusing, chapters they refer to.
My only complaint is that some of the works (e.g "On Having No Head") seemed out of place and not consistent with the rest of the material in the book. But this minor concern does not diminish the value of the book in any way. If you're interested in the subject and are eager for some food for thought, you won't be disappointed.
April 16,2025
... Show More
A tour of a snapshot of cognitive science as it existed in the 1980s, still insightful. Each chapter is an excerpt from another cogsci-related book, the authors post their notes in the reflections section at the end of each chapter. Sometimes they summarize it well, sometimes they completely miss the point.
April 16,2025
... Show More
A fascinating collection of short stories, longer fiction excerpts, dialogues, articles excerpts, philosophical musings, thought experiments and more. The book is divided into 6 parts: 1) A Sense of Self, 2) Soul Searching, 3) From Hardware to Software, 4) Mind as Program, 5) Created Selves and Free Will, 6) The Inner Eye. The authors include Jorge Luis Borges, Stanislaw Lem, Alan Turing, Douglas Hofstadter, Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, Raymond Smullyan, Thomas Nagel, and Robert Nozick, among others. A comprehensive journey including such topics as cognitive sciences, artificial intelligence, quantum physics, psychology and philosophy, mathematics, spirituality and ethics, and beyond. I consider this to be a must-read for anyone interested in understanding one's self and mind.
April 16,2025
... Show More
Among the working assumptions with which we get through the day are those that tell us we have a self, that its decisions are or at least can be freely willed rather than determined, that our intelligence as employed in language transcends what a machine can do, and that these qualities and processes are somehow connected with, embodied in, our physical being, mainly our brain. Philosophers have been questioning these assumptions for some time and proposing answers to the conundrums they provoke. The three words which are the first thing (often the only thing) most of us associate with Descartes, "cogito, ergo sum," were the result of this; after wondering whether his entire mental experience might be an elaborate hoax created by a demon, he concluded, to oversimplify, that because he was able to think he must exist--there must be something doing the thinking. He was neither the first nor the last to wonder about such things.

Numerous recent pieces of fiction and nonfiction examining these issues are contained in this book. I've learned since reading it that the ideas discussed, and in many cases the actual texts, are seen as groundbreaking, essential works in their field. A sampling of its contents:

• The brains-in-vats idea that was employed, in slightly different form, in the movie The Matrix.

• A fable-like version of the reality-is-a-dream idea, dramatized by Jorge Luis Borges in "The Circular Ruins." (Incidentally, a similar treatment, relying on virtual reality rather than dreams, is used by the movie The Thirteenth Floor).

• A tale of simulated consciousnesses, which also manages to question the nature and existence of God, told by Stanislaw Lem in "Non Serviam." Personally, this was the most astounding piece in the book and was, as they say, worth the price of admission all by itself.

• John Searle's challenge to the notion that a machine intelligence can ever understand anything, encapsulated in his translator-in-a-box concept.

• Thomas Nagel's speculation on the nature of consciousness in "What Is It Like to Be a Bat?"

• Richard Dawkins's exposition of the idea of memes--surely you've heard of them by now--in an excerpt from his book The Selfish Gene.

The entire book seems to be available online, though in a less-than-ideal format. Taste it there if you want, but if you're like me you'll prefer to curl up with a real book; there's no e-reader form.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.