...
Show More
I came to The Jesus Incident via a long road. As a young boy I was given a copy of Galaxy magazine and read the precursor to Destination Void, which was then titled Do I Wake or Dream? I thought it was wonderful, but strange. Re-reading it in its longer form was interesting because I could see why the story had enthralled 10-year-old me, even though the older person now found the writing style irritating.
So I read The Jesus Incident out of curiosity, just to see how the story developed. It was an odd and frustrating experience, because it's as though the novel has been partly assembled from writing notes, with sentences and phrases left lying around to trip over, like unused material on a building site.
This stylistic choppiness is reflected in the plotting. Ideas are introduced and abandoned. Characters suddenly acquire capabilities from nowhere. Someone will have a sudden dramatic realisation or scientific insight, and then... nothing.
The style compounds what I found to be a confusing narrative. Others have commented on the novel having few landmarks. Too much of it comprises the internalised musings of characters who, I felt, remained undeveloped throughout. As a result it was difficult to remember, or care, who was who, where they were, and what they were supposed to be doing. Their principle goal seemed to be to think lots of thoughts, far too often expressed as questions to themselves. In fact, over the course of the story they must ask more than a thousand questions in one form or another. Hardly gripping storytelling.
Although the Gaia thesis was interesting and gives the novel a place in the history of science fiction, nothing about the horrors of planet Pandora made much of an impression on me. Death and destruction are described in a rapid, matter-of-fact way, and because so much of the already limited action gets pushed through the thinking filter, the novel fails to generate tension. Its philosophical and metaphysical sections also seem vague, especially when it comes to the ship's dialogue.
In all, a story with some important ideas, but written in a style that I can't engage with.
So I read The Jesus Incident out of curiosity, just to see how the story developed. It was an odd and frustrating experience, because it's as though the novel has been partly assembled from writing notes, with sentences and phrases left lying around to trip over, like unused material on a building site.
This stylistic choppiness is reflected in the plotting. Ideas are introduced and abandoned. Characters suddenly acquire capabilities from nowhere. Someone will have a sudden dramatic realisation or scientific insight, and then... nothing.
The style compounds what I found to be a confusing narrative. Others have commented on the novel having few landmarks. Too much of it comprises the internalised musings of characters who, I felt, remained undeveloped throughout. As a result it was difficult to remember, or care, who was who, where they were, and what they were supposed to be doing. Their principle goal seemed to be to think lots of thoughts, far too often expressed as questions to themselves. In fact, over the course of the story they must ask more than a thousand questions in one form or another. Hardly gripping storytelling.
Although the Gaia thesis was interesting and gives the novel a place in the history of science fiction, nothing about the horrors of planet Pandora made much of an impression on me. Death and destruction are described in a rapid, matter-of-fact way, and because so much of the already limited action gets pushed through the thinking filter, the novel fails to generate tension. Its philosophical and metaphysical sections also seem vague, especially when it comes to the ship's dialogue.
In all, a story with some important ideas, but written in a style that I can't engage with.