...
Show More
3.5/5 - There is a lot of really good stuff in here. I think the strongest sections are on wounds, sexuality, and a man's longing for his woman. I do find that most of the references to outdoor activities (hunting, fishing, rock climbing, etc) work best as an allegory for adventure in a man's life... a man can work in a cubicle and have tame hobbies and yet be a strong man of God. A man doesn't have to be into fishing to be wild at heart. The core tenet is to fight for what's worth fighting for, and chase your passions, never get caught in the mundane. A sense of achievement and adventure are important parts of being a man. Contrary to what the author suggests the world does not need more "dangerous" men, the world needs kind and patient men that will fight for their families, pursue their passions, and make their relationship with God the first priority.
P.S. - I did knock some points off the rating because of the author's clear lack of knowledge on first-century Judaism, especially pertaining to Paul and Pharisees. No, Paul was not disillusioned with his Jewish faith and practice. Nor are Pharisees "weasels". That is clear anti-Jewish sentiment, their faults in the Gospels are some of the same things many of us today are guilty of as well. I think the author could use a history lesson on early Judaism but I digress. Good book nonetheless.
P.S. - I did knock some points off the rating because of the author's clear lack of knowledge on first-century Judaism, especially pertaining to Paul and Pharisees. No, Paul was not disillusioned with his Jewish faith and practice. Nor are Pharisees "weasels". That is clear anti-Jewish sentiment, their faults in the Gospels are some of the same things many of us today are guilty of as well. I think the author could use a history lesson on early Judaism but I digress. Good book nonetheless.