...
Show More
Aristophanes could be likened to modern day late night comedy in his scathing satire and mockery of society and politics and couple with Alan Sommersteins' translation it brings into effect a Monty Python-esque language and atmosphere, very suiting to the sharp critique of Aristophanes.
The play is essentially a critique of Athens decision to go to war and to pursue it and an attack on those who orchestrated it on the one hand and who tried to intimidate Aristophanes in the past (Cleon, one of the generals of the city). Through the main character, Dikaiopolis, he decries the decision to continue the war with Sparta, to embargo Megara and Thebes (while mocking them still as natural enemies) and demands peace while denouncing the corrupt and incompetent ruling class. One of the funniest scenes is when Dikaiopolis, the champion of peace and Lamachus the warmonger, face off in a contrasting scene where one prepares for extavagant revelry and fun, while the other prepares for war and ends up wounded by falling in a ditch. Dikaiopolis also decides to make his own peace with Sparta and to trade with the embargoed cities on his own terms creating some very humorous scenes that mix Athenian pride, disdain for the enemies but also disdain for those who started the war. It should be noted that the play does not promote pacifism of any kind, rather it calls for a strategically timed peace with the cities opponents.
Throughout the play and using elements typical of the comedic plays of the time, for instance interacting with the audience and referencing past events and plays as well as the authors( and their supposed unwillingness to buy lunch for the chorus).Aristophanes launches sharp attacks at Cleon and Lamachus and other leaders of Athenian society, standing strong despite previous attempts to shut him down (referenced in the play) he also decries the poor morals of the city and the hardships it imposes on it's allies in the countryside of Attica and in Greece. He also takes some very humorous jabs at Euripides, the tragedy playwright, for good effect.
All in all an excellent piece of comedy, one can easily imagine the roars of laughter of the audience and the indignation of the cities rulers at the sight and sound of such witty satire. A down side would be the constant need to check the references Aristophanes is alluding to, many of them are impossible to understand without supporting notes and this can make the read rather difficult and sluggish.
The play is essentially a critique of Athens decision to go to war and to pursue it and an attack on those who orchestrated it on the one hand and who tried to intimidate Aristophanes in the past (Cleon, one of the generals of the city). Through the main character, Dikaiopolis, he decries the decision to continue the war with Sparta, to embargo Megara and Thebes (while mocking them still as natural enemies) and demands peace while denouncing the corrupt and incompetent ruling class. One of the funniest scenes is when Dikaiopolis, the champion of peace and Lamachus the warmonger, face off in a contrasting scene where one prepares for extavagant revelry and fun, while the other prepares for war and ends up wounded by falling in a ditch. Dikaiopolis also decides to make his own peace with Sparta and to trade with the embargoed cities on his own terms creating some very humorous scenes that mix Athenian pride, disdain for the enemies but also disdain for those who started the war. It should be noted that the play does not promote pacifism of any kind, rather it calls for a strategically timed peace with the cities opponents.
Throughout the play and using elements typical of the comedic plays of the time, for instance interacting with the audience and referencing past events and plays as well as the authors( and their supposed unwillingness to buy lunch for the chorus).Aristophanes launches sharp attacks at Cleon and Lamachus and other leaders of Athenian society, standing strong despite previous attempts to shut him down (referenced in the play) he also decries the poor morals of the city and the hardships it imposes on it's allies in the countryside of Attica and in Greece. He also takes some very humorous jabs at Euripides, the tragedy playwright, for good effect.
All in all an excellent piece of comedy, one can easily imagine the roars of laughter of the audience and the indignation of the cities rulers at the sight and sound of such witty satire. A down side would be the constant need to check the references Aristophanes is alluding to, many of them are impossible to understand without supporting notes and this can make the read rather difficult and sluggish.