Having read everything of Michael Pollan's that I could get my hands on since I first encountered his work, I was truly surprised to learn that he had written about his writing hut. He mentions his writing hut occasionally in his later books, and I had often wondered about it. Pollan's work is always masterful, and this one, while not yet as accomplished and engaging as his later works, fascinated me. It is almost incidentally one of the most dramatic character arcs I've read in literature, and this feat is performed in a work of non-fiction.
At the book's start, Pollan is not quite Pollan yet. However, as the book progresses, he seems to develop into the writer I so admire. He is fighting against the square, fighting against fighting against the square, and deeply examining every aspect of his material. And to this day, what makes Pollan Pollan is the way he juxtaposes his analytical nature and his poetic nature, his fight for innovation and against the square, and his fight against his fight against square.
It also left me with a number of questions. How was Pollan's work influenced by the writing hut that he built specifically to create the work I so enjoyed? Would he have been the Michael Pollan who wrote The Botany of Desire had he not been the Michael Pollan who built this structure? And so, in a way, I became a character in this book as well. I love his work, and so, being the first person in my own story, Pollan wrote these books for me. What if he hadn't built this hut? Would I have lost something I dearly love? I think the answer to this is yes. I hate to think of a world without The Omnivore's Dilemma, or the phrase, "eat food, mostly plants, not too much." That would be a painful loss to me. The hut belongs to Pollan, built by his own lights and for his work, but the fruits of his labor belong to me. He and his hut changed me, and I would argue, the world.