When I was in high school, I had the opportunity to read an Ursula K. Le Guin story in my Science Fiction Literature class. At that time, I found it extremely difficult to read. I naively thought it was because I was young and relatively inexperienced as a reader. However, when I saw this book at a library book sale, something inside me compelled me to pick it up and give it another try.
To my surprise, I discovered that my initial difficulty had nothing to do with my age or inexperience. Le Guin's writing style is characterized by peculiar word order that often confuses the meaning, missing or extra commas, excessive adverbial phrases, and run-on sentences. Here are some examples from this very book.
"As evening came on serried lines of clouds rose from the west, borne on great winds from the sea, and burnt fiery before the sun, reddening it as it sank." This sentence, while perhaps intended to create a vivid image, is rather convoluted.
"The stillness of the earth was strange to them when they had beached Lookfar and walked after so long on solid ground." The way she worded this made me initially think they had walked a long time on solid ground, which is not the case. A simple addition of commas or a change in word order could have made the meaning much clearer.
"Though he spoke in the language of the Making, yet Arren understood, at last, as all who ear that invocation must understand, for it has power over all....... " This is not only a run-on sentence but also contains redundant words like "though" and "yet".
I truly liked the story itself. It had the potential to be very captivating if not for the cumbersome prose. I'm now in a dilemma as to whether I will read the rest of the series or any other Ursula K. Le Guin stories. Trying to decipher what she is saying slows me down and prevents me from fully immersing myself in the story. But then again, I am a fan of descriptive yet efficient prose.
If you have an opinion on this, please feel free to comment on this review. I would be delighted to hear your perspective.