I truly loved it,

primarily because it strongly appeals to the intellectual side within me that firmly believes in the power of rational decision-making.

This aspect of it really caught my attention and held my interest. It presented ideas and concepts in a way that made me think deeply and analytically.

It challenged me to consider different perspectives and evaluate various options based on logic and reason. The way it was presented allowed me to engage with it on a higher intellectual level, which is something I highly value.

It made me feel that I was not just passively consuming information, but actively participating in a process of rational thought and decision-making. Overall, it was a truly enriching and satisfying experience that I thoroughly enjoyed.

I found this truly interesting.

I agreed with a significant number of his points. However, I was somewhat sceptical about others. In particular, his refusal to consider global climate change as a real probability was rather concerning.

I would have really liked to hear his opinions on concepts such as the difference between correlation and causality. Understanding this is crucial in many fields.

Also, the idea of non-linear "predictions" is an area that is both fascinating and complex. It would be great to know his thoughts on how to approach and make sense of such predictions.

Furthermore, the occurrences of unintended consequences in some cases where logic is followed and seems infallible is another aspect that I think he could have shed some light on. These are all important considerations that could have added more depth to his arguments.

Overall, while I found his article engaging, there were certain areas where I felt his viewpoints could have been further explored and expanded upon.

A Defense of Reason and Logical Thought

If you've delved into Malcolm Gladwell's "Blink," you'll understand the power and perils of rapid cognition. While "Blink" presents fascinating insights into the split-second decisions we make, it's essential to also defend the value of reason and logical thought.

Reason allows us to analyze situations objectively, consider multiple perspectives, and weigh the evidence before arriving at a conclusion. It helps us avoid snap judgments that may be based on biases or incomplete information. Logical thought enables us to construct coherent arguments, identify fallacies, and make sound decisions.

While intuition and gut feelings have their place, they should not be the sole basis for our actions. By combining the speed of intuitive thinking with the rigor of reason and logic, we can make more informed and effective choices. This defense of reason and logical thought serves as a reminder that in the age of quick decisions, we must not abandon the power of careful analysis and rational thinking.

Excellent Rebuttal to Malcolm Gladwell's "Blink"

Malcolm Gladwell's "Blink" has been widely discussed and has had a significant impact. However, this work also has its critics. An excellent rebuttal to "Blink" can provide a different perspective and challenge some of Gladwell's assumptions.

The rebuttal might focus on the root problems of the current US landscape. It could argue that Gladwell's ideas are too simplistic and do not fully address the complex social, economic, and political issues that exist. For example, it might question whether snap judgments are always reliable or whether they can lead to unfair or inaccurate conclusions.

Furthermore, the rebuttal could encourage the reader to continually challenge himself mentally. It could suggest that rather than relying on quick judgments, we should take the time to think deeply and critically about the issues at hand. This might involve gathering more information, considering different perspectives, and evaluating the evidence objectively.

In conclusion, an excellent rebuttal to "Blink" can offer valuable insights and stimulate further discussion. By challenging Gladwell's ideas and encouraging the reader to think more deeply, it can help us to better understand the complex world around us and make more informed decisions.

Do yourself a favor and don't read this.

Need reasons?

"The fact that the vast majority of children diagnosed with ADD or ADHD are boys naturally raises the suspicion that the trend is part of a larger feminist agenda." I don't need to give you context, just the simple understanding that this man had the gall to write that sentence.

Moving on:

"So what does it mean to say, on the basis of decades of test scores and grades, that women appear to have less 'intrinsic aptitude' than men in math and the sciences? It certainly doesn't mean that women as a group can't do science, as the presence of many high-profile female scientists across all branches of the natural and physical sciences attest. It could mean that, on average, the female brain is not as adept at performing the types of abstract mental algorithms needed for math and science problems as the average male brain. It could also mean that women, on the whole, are not as naturally motivated and interested in studying math, science, and engineering subjects." Yes. That's right. Go ahead and read the damn book if you don't believe me.

His one decent claim is that the average American citizen has lost the desire to look at life critically. But then he writes this absolute genital-stomping flub of a book to prove his point. He fails miserably. His ideas are not only baseless but also offensive and discriminatory. The statements about ADD/ADHD and women's aptitude in math and science are completely unfounded and lack any scientific evidence. It is a shame that such a book exists and that someone would have the audacity to publish such rubbish. We should all be more critical of the information we consume and not give credence to such absurd claims.

I simply couldn't endure listening to the entire book.

He was extremely long-winded, which made it a real struggle to get through.

Nevertheless, within the text, there were a few truly compelling arguments.

For instance, the discussions on ADHD, feminism, and self-esteem were highly enlightening.

These particular topics were presented in a way that made me think deeply and gain new perspectives.

Although the overall experience of listening to the book was marred by the excessive verbosity, these few shining moments of interesting and thought-provoking content made it somewhat worthwhile.

I found myself reflecting on these arguments long after I had finished listening, and they have likely had an impact on my own thinking and understanding.

It just goes to show that even in a book that may have some drawbacks, there can still be valuable nuggets of wisdom to be discovered.

In the beginning, I was constantly putting the book down. It was so dense that it felt like reading a textbook.

As I delved further into the text, I was ashamed to realize that I was exactly like the "America" LeGault was talking about. I wasn't willing to exert the effort to truly think about something. I'd much rather have things be easy and understandable in the blink of an eye.

Continuing my reading, I was mortified to discover that LeGault wasn't far off the mark in classifying people like me. What happened to thinking for myself? When did I stop asking questions about the world around me? Why did I decide to take things at face value instead of questioning what I really thought about them? Ugh. I am disgusted with myself, which I think was the point of "Think".

LeGault really drove home the point that American society as a whole is slowly sliding downhill. If we don't make the necessary changes now, our critical thinking and reasoning skills will atrophy and eventually die off completely.

All of that said, I was NOT a fan of his constant condescension toward Gladwell's "Blink". It is entirely possible to write a critical response that refutes an argument without the stinging barbs of a borderline personal attack. What happened to everyone being entitled to their own opinion?

I picked up this book because I wanted to read LeGault's take on the whole critical thinking concept. However, his intermittent bashing of "Blink" startled me and interrupted my flow of reading. Instead of considering the point LeGault made, I found myself trying to remember what part of "Blink" he was referring to in his insult. His disdain was almost palpable, a huge turnoff for me.

But the points he makes saved the book for me, especially the end where he neatly wraps up all of the problems he cites by providing ideas for solutions. This book definitely got me thinking.

The text under review appears to have a rather inconsistent writing style.

At times, it delves into dogmatic prose, which can come across as overly authoritative and perhaps lacking in objectivity.

Subsequently, it reverts to a more research-based prose, which is a step in the right direction as it provides a more solid foundation for the ideas presented.

However, the overall stilted nature of the writing, particularly in the earlier parts of the text, makes it a rather tiresome read.

This kind of writing style seems unnecessary and may deter readers from fully engaging with the content.

Based on these observations, I cannot recommend this text.

It would benefit from a more fluid and engaging writing style that balances the need for dogmatic statements with the importance of presenting research-based evidence in a more accessible way.

The information explosion is not resulting in enhanced critical thinking. Instead, it is largely being misused to spout off random opinions or simply confirm pre-existing biases and flawed thought processes.

LeGault's book, despite having some sections that are a bit challenging to get through, presents several relevant and crucial points. Have we truly devolved into a world of followers and conformists? Are individuals like Paris Hilton and Charlie Sheen now regarded as our new cultural heroes? Who exactly is exerting control over our thoughts? And how do we arrive at the conclusions regarding the choices we make? These are all very interesting questions.

I find myself pondering these ideas deeply. It makes me realize the importance of being more discerning in the face of the overwhelming amount of information available. I think I will now take some time to reflect and further explore these thoughts.

Perhaps it is time for us to reevaluate our relationship with information and strive to develop more independent and critical thinking skills. Only then can we hope to navigate the complex landscape of the modern world with greater clarity and purpose.

Think... It teaches us not just to blink when making decisions, but we must use reason.

This book reviews the great thinkers.

It makes me strive to learn to be a great thinker.

We often make decisions impulsively, without much thought. However, this book emphasizes the importance of using our rational thinking.

By studying the lives and ideas of great thinkers, we can gain valuable insights and inspiration.

It encourages us to question, analyze, and evaluate different perspectives.

As I read this book, I am motivated to improve my own thinking skills.

I want to be able to make more informed and intelligent decisions in my life.

This book serves as a guide and a source of motivation for me on this journey of becoming a better thinker.

This was an absolutely fantastic book.

It delved deep into the various aspects of society and presented a thought-provoking analysis of the direction it is currently taking.

The author's insights were both profound and eye-opening, making it a must-read for anyone who has even the slightest concern about the state of our society.

Whether it's issues related to politics, culture, or social inequality, this book covers it all.

It offers a unique perspective that challenges the reader to think critically and question the status quo.

I wholeheartedly recommend this book to anyone who is looking for a stimulating and engaging read that will leave them with a newfound understanding of the world around them.

Don't miss out on this amazing literary work!

For all you people that read and actually liked "Blink", by Malcolm Gladwell, think again after you read this!

"Blink" is often regarded as an interesting and thought-provoking book. However, upon closer examination, there are several aspects that can be considered irrational.

The book presents the idea that snap judgments can be as accurate as those made after careful deliberation. While this may seem appealing at first, it fails to account for the numerous factors that can influence our initial impressions.

Our snap judgments are often based on biases, stereotypes, and incomplete information. Without taking the time to analyze and consider all the relevant details, we may make incorrect or hasty decisions.

In conclusion, while "Blink" may make for an engaging read, it is important to approach its ideas with a critical eye. We should not blindly accept the notion that snap judgments are always reliable. Instead, we should strive to make informed decisions by gathering as much information as possible and carefully considering all the options.