7.6/10

I wholeheartedly concur with the assertion that critical thinking has become a lost art. The points presented seem to form a robust refutation of those who hold a different view. However, I did experience a sense of losing purpose during the exposition of some of the chapters. Nevertheless, it wasn't to the extent that I didn't find the information captivating.

I am a devotee of the book Blink by Malcolm Gladwell. I believe that these two works are discussing two aspects of the same concept, which led to my confusion regarding the statement that this book is the antithesis of Blink. In this regard, I beg to differ.

Critical thinking is indeed a crucial skill that seems to be fading away in today's society. The ability to analyze, evaluate, and think independently is essential for making informed decisions and solving complex problems. The argument presented in this article highlights the importance of critical thinking and challenges the notion that it is not as significant as some may think.

While I may have had moments of losing focus during the reading, the overall content was still engaging and thought-provoking. It made me reflect on my own thinking processes and how I can improve my critical thinking skills.

Regarding the comparison with Blink, I think both books offer valuable insights into the human mind and decision-making. They may approach the topic from different angles, but they are not mutually exclusive. Instead, they can complement each other and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the subject.

In conclusion, I found this article to be a valuable contribution to the discussion on critical thinking. It presented a strong argument and provided thought-provoking ideas that made me question my own assumptions and beliefs. I would highly recommend it to anyone interested in improving their critical thinking skills or exploring the topic further.

This book offers an engaging and thought-provoking analysis of the connection between culture and critical thinking.

The author has painstakingly constructed each chapter, presenting a genuine homage to the intricacies of the human mind.

By delving into this relationship, the book not only entertains but also challenges readers to expand their perspectives.

It explores how different cultural backgrounds can shape our ways of thinking and how critical thinking skills can help us navigate the diverse cultural landscapes we encounter.

With its detailed examination and engaging writing style, this book is a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the fascinating interplay between culture and critical thinking.

Whether you are a student, educator, or simply someone curious about the human mind, this book is sure to provide you with new insights and perspectives.

It encourages us to question our assumptions, embrace different cultures, and develop our critical thinking abilities to better understand the world around us.

Overall, this book is a must-read for anyone looking to enhance their understanding of the complex relationship between culture and critical thinking.

I wholeheartedly agree with the fundamental premise put forth in this book. It is of utmost importance that we do not let critical thinking take a backseat, as it is currently at risk of happening in America today. This stands in contrast to Malcolm Gladwell's glorification of snap decisions and gut reactions in his work "Blink."

Of course, both approaches have their own advantages. It appears that the most advisable way of thinking is a rational combination of the two. To be completely transparent, as of this moment, I have not read Gladwell's extensive volume.

The content within this book is quite good. It provides an overview of critical thinking and reason, delves into discussions about the effects of TV, child-rearing, and famous thinkers. However, the author's decision to read his own work is a misstep. His voice lacks vitality, and his enunciation is rather poor. This leads to issues such as "gender" constantly sounding like "ginger," "deterioration" being mispronounced as "deteriation," and the unfortunate "nucular." All of this makes it somewhat challenging to fully understand some of the information. Having just listened to "In Defense of Food," I now find myself less critical of Scott Brick's overly grand voice performance in that audiobook.

**An Interesting Rebuttal to John Malcolm's "Blink"**

In his work "Blink", John Malcolm presents some thought-provoking ideas. However, there are several aspects that can be challenged.

For instance, Malcolm argues that our snap judgments are often more accurate than our深思熟虑的 decisions. While it is true that our intuitions can sometimes be reliable, it is a stretch to claim that they are always superior. There are many factors that can influence our snap judgments, such as biases, emotions, and limited information.

Moreover, Malcolm's examples to support his论点 may not be as conclusive as he makes them out to be. In some cases, the success of a snap judgment could be due to luck or other external factors rather than the inherent accuracy of the judgment.

Another point of contention is Malcolm's dismissal of the importance of conscious thought and analysis. While quick decisions can be useful in certain situations, it is essential to also consider the long-term consequences and implications. Conscious thought allows us to weigh the pros and cons, consider different perspectives, and make more informed decisions.

In conclusion, while John Malcolm's "Blink" offers some interesting insights, it is not without its flaws. A more balanced approach that combines both intuition and conscious thought is likely to lead to better decision-making.

This is an outstanding book.

It delves deep into the crucial aspect of how we are currently teaching and learning, which unfortunately often leads to the suppression of independent thinking.

It examines the various factors and methods that contribute to this phenomenon, such as traditional educational systems, standardized testing, and rote learning.

However, the book doesn't just stop at highlighting the problem. It also offers valuable insights and practical suggestions on how we can bring about a change.

It encourages educators, parents, and students alike to embrace a more innovative and critical approach to learning.

By fostering curiosity, creativity, and the ability to question and analyze, we can break free from the shackles of non-thinking and develop a generation of individuals who are capable of independent thought and can make a positive impact on the world.

This book is a must-read for anyone who is concerned about the future of education and the development of our society.

Yeah, this was really disappointing.

I think it comes down to two things. Firstly, the author doesn't really make an effort to argue his opinion. Instead, he simply asserts that those who think differently are clearly not thinking critically and are thus bad. This is extremely amateurish and undermines the entire premise and intent of the book.

Secondly, the book is dated. Not only are the anecdotes and stories outdated, which might be acceptable, but the perspective and approach are also outdated. During the War in Iraq and the recession years, there was a particular style of writing that was very straightforward, with little optimism and very limited attempts at exploring an idea. It was either one way or the other in the 2000's, and this comes across here.

So, with these two problems, this book gives the impression of being pessimistic, self-serving, and unconvincing. It fails to engage the reader and present a compelling argument. It could have been so much better if the author had taken a more thoughtful and nuanced approach.

Love the blatant, extremely honest, and dead-on argument against the widely popular book, BLINK.

This book seems to advocate for making decisions based on quick instincts and emotions, rather than taking the time to think things through. However, this approach can lead to hasty and inaccurate judgments.

Using our brain like we are supposed to means carefully considering all the facts, analyzing the situation, and weighing the pros and cons. It's about using rational thinking and not being swayed by our initial impulses.

Sure, there may be times when our instincts can be useful, but they should not be the sole basis for our decisions. We need to be able to think critically and objectively to make the best choices.

In conclusion, while the idea of making quick decisions may seem appealing, it's important to remember that thinking things through is often the better approach. We should not be misled by books like BLINK that promote a more impulsive way of thinking.

It has been a hell of a fight to finish this book.

The journey of writing this book has been filled with countless challenges and obstacles. There were times when I felt completely stuck, not knowing how to move forward with the story.

But I refused to give up. I pushed myself harder, spending countless hours researching, writing, and revising.

There were also moments of self-doubt and frustration, but I reminded myself of why I started this project in the first place.

And now, finally, it is done. I am proud of what I have accomplished, but I also know that this is just the beginning.

There is still so much more to do, so many more stories to tell. But for now, I am going to take a moment to celebrate this achievement and look forward to the next adventure.

Unfortunately for Mr. LeGault, I am actually a student of critical thinking, and I am not overly impressed with his critical thinking skills. Here is the reason why I do not recommend his book.

First, his criticism of Malcolm Gladwell's book, Blink, is dishonest. The point he is criticizing is inaccurate, and the illustration he uses to prove his point is a poor comparison of BlinkThink vs critical thinking skills, which is what his book is truly about. In the end, it is evident why he named his book Think and targeted Blink - he wants readers to buy his book, and associating it with a well-known author will attract some to read it. It did for me! However, in reality, his book is not a criticism of Blink but rather a dissertation on how people need to exercise critical thinking skills and a warning that our society is not moving in that direction. I completely agree with that point, but what he claims as his premise on the front of his book is not the actual premise in the book, and thus it is dishonest.

Second, his book is dull. Mr. Gladwell does an excellent job of taking scientific research on how the brain functions and simplifying it so that the average person can begin to understand more complex science. Mr. LeGault should praise rather than criticize the work that Mr. Gladwell is doing. In fact, after reading a Gladwell book, one is left with the desire to think more and question more, rather than making hasty conclusions. Even in his book, Blink, Mr. Gladwell was not encouraging people to make snap judgments. He was stating that some people, after having a great deal of experience in certain fields, have the ability to quickly reach conclusions. Mr. LeGault completely missed this point. Again, Mr. LeGault wants to sell books, and picking on a well-known author, even dishonestly, helped him achieve that.

Third, one gets the impression that there are very few original thoughts from Mr. LeGault in Think. He cites numerous sources, to the extent that one starts to prefer reading his sources rather than his uninteresting book. It reads like a research paper, and his examples are brief and often uninteresting. Mr. Gladwell understood that to write a book about a dull subject like psychology and sociology, one must use interesting examples and studies to maintain the reader's interest. For instance, Mr. LeGault has a chapter on "fear" and how fear prevents people from thinking rationally. It's a great topic. However, he does little to make it engaging. He could have described studies conducted to show how fear makes people do certain things. Instead, he just talks about it as if we should simply stop fearing and control our emotions. Everyone knows that. Obvious! Show us the science. Describe the science. Explain the consequences. Teach, don't lecture.

Lastly, the only group his book is beneficial for is the group that is least likely to read it - the non-critical thinkers. If you read books like Mr. Gladwell's, then you don't need this book. You are already well on your way to thinking critically. On the other hand, if you mostly read novels, then this book could be of some benefit to you. Yet, I would highly recommend Mr. Gladwell's books, or Thomas Friedman's books, or many others that have made it to the top-10 bestseller list.

When my only thought as I progressed further and further through the book was how negative a review I was going to write, one might wonder why I didn't just put the book down. Because, after all, even a bad book teaches us something - which authors to avoid. If the author ever reads this review, please drop me a message through GoodReads. I would enjoy debating these points with you.

This book

bears a certain resemblance to Malcolm Gladwell's "Blink". However, the difference lies in that "Blink" focuses on intuitive thinking, while "Think" centers around critical thinking.

Overall, it is a fairly good read. Nevertheless, I don't entirely concur with all the viewpoints expressed by the author.

Interestingly, it also shares similarities with "The Closing of the American Mind" by Allen Bloom.

These similarities and differences make "Think" a thought-provoking and engaging book that encourages readers to reflect on their own thinking processes and approaches.

It challenges us to question our assumptions, analyze information more critically, and make more informed decisions.

Whether you are a fan of Gladwell or Bloom, or simply interested in exploring the realm of thinking and cognition, "Think" is definitely worth a look.

It offers valuable insights and perspectives that can help you enhance your thinking skills and become a more discerning and intelligent individual.

I have only read the introduction, but I have to wonder: did this author really READ Blink?

It seems rather strange to make such bold claims based solely on the introduction.

The introduction is just a brief overview, and it may not fully capture the essence and depth of the entire book.

Blink is a complex and thought-provoking work that likely requires a more comprehensive reading to truly understand and appreciate.

One cannot simply assume that they know everything about the book from just the introduction.

It is possible that the author has some valid points, but without reading the rest of the book, it is difficult to say for sure.

Maybe the author has a different perspective or interpretation that could be interesting to explore.

However, until they have actually read Blink in its entirety, their claims remain somewhat suspect.

It is important to approach any book with an open mind and a willingness to engage with the material on a deeper level.

Only then can we truly form our own opinions and have a meaningful discussion about the ideas presented.

153.42 LEG

The number 153.42 LEG holds a certain significance. It could potentially refer to a specific measurement, a code, or something else entirely. Without further context, it's difficult to determine its exact meaning. However, we can imagine various possibilities. Maybe it's a length measurement in a particular field, such as engineering or construction. Or perhaps it's a unique identifier for a product or a project. It could also be a part of a mathematical equation or a statistical analysis. The possibilities are endless.

As we explore the meaning of 153.42 LEG, we might need to consider the surrounding information and the context in which it is used. This could involve looking at related documents, discussing with experts in the relevant field, or conducting further research. By doing so, we can gain a better understanding of what this number represents and how it fits into the bigger picture.

In conclusion, while 153.42 LEG may seem like a mysterious and random combination of characters and numbers, it likely has a specific meaning within a particular context. By delving deeper and exploring the possibilities, we can uncover its true significance and use it to our advantage.