Fascinating and informative, this survey of the presocratics and sophists is truly a gem. I deeply wish I had begun my philosophical journey with this book before delving into Plato and Aristotle. Firstly, Plato and Aristotle often mischaracterize many of these thinkers for their own purposes. Secondly, with the knowledge of the influences of the presocratics and sophists, Plato and Aristotle become much easier to understand in a meaningful way. Moreover, one can clearly see the profound influence these early thinkers had on numerous later philosophers and philosophical systems. The presocratics and sophists are indeed the fundamental building blocks of western philosophy, and I am now firmly convinced of their indispensability.
As this is my very first exploration into the realm of the "first philosophers," I am not in a strong position to assess Waterfield's approach in presenting them to the reader. However, she provides every reason for me to believe that she evaluates each thinker in an academically honest manner. After a brief introduction, the philosophers are given the opportunity to speak for themselves, and each introduction is transparent about translation issues and the different interpretations that exist within the academic community. Waterfield makes clear disclaimers when she imposes her own view on any given philosopher and even challenges the reader in the introduction to interrogate the texts and develop their own theories. In this way, her approach to interpretation seems similar to that of Protagoras: no one interpretation is necessarily 100% correct, but there are undoubtedly better interpretations than others.
I wholeheartedly recommend this book to anyone with an interest in western philosophy. It offers a valuable and enlightening perspective on the early roots of this rich and complex field.