2.5 stars.
The message conveyed in this work is truly beautiful. It has the power to touch the hearts of the readers and make them reflect on certain aspects of life. The story, overall, was fairly enjoyable. It had its moments that kept the readers engaged and interested in finding out what would happen next.
However, there were some drawbacks. The chapters that focused on the police officer and the land foreman were extremely boring. They seemed to drag on and on, lacking the excitement and energy that the other parts of the story had. It was a bit of a letdown and made it a bit of a struggle to get through those sections.
On the positive side, the characters of Roy, the shoeless kid, and Beatrice were really lovable. They were well-developed and had their own unique personalities that made them stand out. The readers couldn't help but root for them and hope that they would succeed in their endeavors. Their relationships with each other added an extra layer of depth to the story and made it even more engaging.
(re)Read as part of my ongoing shelf audit. Verdict: A charming book for younger readers, one of which I no longer am. I feel that I had recalled this book as having a greater focus on the owls than it actually does. In reality, it is mainly a story about a boy who, after moving, discovers a place and a way in which he belongs. The owls just happen to be the catalyst for that. It is more about Roy developing friendships and defining himself than it is about protecting the owls. And that's okay, but I guess in my mind I had morphed it into the MG version of The Monkey Wrench Gang, which it truly isn't. (Although it does sort of end up approving of a bit of mild ecoterrorism for kids, as long as they've done their homework first.) The fact that I remembered it as a stronger plea for ecological justice is, at least to me, a positive aspect. I was likely predisposed to take away that kind of message anyway, but hey, if it inspires other young people to care about conservation, all the better!
I read Hoot to my kids when it was first released and they were still young. Recently, I reread it and was once again amazed by what a brilliant young adult novel it is. I have been a fan of Carl Hiassen's adult novels ever since Tourist Season came out. However, it wasn't until I read Hoot again that I truly understood what a fantastic storyteller he is. This story is written ABOUT teens/young adults, not specifically FOR that age group. This means that adults can also read and enjoy it. I recently read a young adult novel by another writer I like, but it was the complete opposite. In my humble opinion, Hoot is the pinnacle. So, give a hoot and don't eat Mother Paula's pancakes!
Reader thoughts:
I found the writing to be somewhat acceptable, but the research was truly lamentable. Let's take a closer look at some of the issues.
1. Construction sites: After vandalism or mischief, a construction site would typically hire 24/7 security. I know this from personal experience as my husband used to work as a security guard for construction sites. They wouldn't just rely on the local police to keep an eye on the place. Additionally, the first step should be tilling the land to get rid of all owl burrows, not waiting until after staking out the area. Also, if the crew has the necessary equipment, there's no reason to keep waiting. In the book, they constantly delay until "tomorrow" or "Monday morning" instead of just getting the job done. Many construction crews work in the evening or night, especially if they're behind schedule.
2. Emergency Departments: ERs have locked doors between the waiting room and the rest of the ER. My husband currently works at an ER, so I know this for a fact. Parents can't simply push past the nurse to reach their child. If someone manages to push past the magnetic lock, an alarm immediately sounds. Moreover, doctors don't get 25-minute breaks, especially if they have only one patient. The only reason parents wouldn't be allowed to see their child is if the doctor suspects neglect or abuse, in which case the police would be called. In fact, my husband says the police are always called when minors are brought in with dog bites. And there's no way a patient could sneak out of the ER without alerting the doctor, nurse, and everyone else.
3. Schools: If a kid is knocked out by a golf ball, the appropriate action is to call his parents, not send him to school and have the vice principal yell at him. Also, if he has bruises on his neck from being choked and he defended himself by breaking the larger kid's nose, he shouldn't be suspended, even just from the bus. I work at a school and I know this wouldn't happen.
4. Burrowing owls: From what I've read, they are protected and do live in Florida. However, their burrows flood during the rainy season. Since the book mentions 8-12 inches of rain in 3 days, it's clearly the rainy season, so the owls are probably elsewhere at the moment. This is based on my internet research, not personal experience.
Overall, this book frustrated me. There are other issues as well.
The runaway boy: How can having a boy be a runaway be part of the conclusion? This is not good, regardless of how well he can take care of himself. I don't want this to be a kids' book if it promotes 12-year-olds running away.
The protest: Kids lined up in front of construction equipment for over an hour and nobody did anything? That seems highly unlikely. Later, we learn that the company was missing their EIS, but the kids didn't know this. They were just trying to protect the owls. But they are just owls! They will find a different place to live. Every building disrupts animal life to some extent. Was this really worth vandalism, poisonous snakes, and property damage? The missing EIS should have been the main point, not just the cuteness of the owls. You can't go around causing damage to equipment because you feel sorry for animals. You need to follow the law and find legal reasons why the company can't build there yet.
I care about animals and the environment, but I don't agree with the methods of the 12-year-olds in this book. I also don't think this book should be given to 12-year-olds to show them how to break the law and pretend it's a good thing because they were saving the homes of the owls.
Writer thoughts:
Sympathy is a complex emotion. I think this book made me feel more sympathetic towards the police officer and Curly than towards the runaway boy vandal. The terrible things that happened to Curly and the police officer outweighed anything they might have deserved, which is why my sympathy increased. As a result, readers may end up caring more for the antagonist than for the protagonist. I suppose this is why the protagonist works best as an underdog and has to be losing most of the battles until the end.
No, I never cared about Muck Chuckle, the vice president of the pancake company. He was the true antagonist, but he didn't appear until the end, so he wasn't as prominent as Curly and the officer.