...
Show More
Williams is an especially confounding writer. Her voice is very assured, which, however, contains the seeds of alienation and annoyance. This assurance stems from privilege, money, and an intact family. She can talk about democracy as much as she likes (and she does, especially in later works), but she is at the higher end of the social spectrum. Democracy (or any system) usually works well for such people. Moreover, she tries too hard to extract some fundamental truth from her prose, which often leads to a sense of artificiality. Interwoven with this tendency is perhaps the most irritating aspect of her work - what can only be described as degeneration into "crystal gazing prose," or abstract, highly pretentious, spiritual drivel. Much of her dialogue seems untrue, as do several moments in the narrative (for example, when she sticks a middle finger in the face of the hicks). From a mechanical point of view, her constant use of passive verb construction slows down the text. On the other hand, and this is why she is so confounding, there are moments of sublimity, truth, and truly outstanding writing that almost make the reading experience worthwhile. She skillfully manipulates thematic elements throughout, balancing the concepts of "isolation" and "solitude" in a dialectical dance. "Solitude" appears to be the goal, synonymous with "refuge," an acceptance of life's rhythms (including death). And her use of the lake level is quietly effective: the story begins and ends at the same level, a subtle way of achieving a kind of closure. Overall, Williams' writing is a complex and often frustrating mix of strengths and weaknesses.