"Night" was not as harrowing as I had expected. The stark writing style is indeed moving, particularly when it centers around the author's "betrayal" of his father. However, I feel that it lacks the precise choice of details and words that would have made the incidents more piercing. Even the famous description of the hanging of the child seems to lack focus, relying too much on sentimentality. At one moment, the victim is described as a tall and well-built young man, while at another, he is just a child. Having recently reread George Orwell's essay "A Hanging", I couldn't help but compare the two. There is nothing in "Night" that can match the victim's sidestepping of a puddle on his way to the scaffold in Orwell's work, that unforgettable humanizing detail.
"Dawn", a short novel, has a promising premise - a Holocaust survivor becomes a resistance fighter in British-ruled Palestine. But once again, the promise is not fulfilled. What little plot there is is buried under a thick layer of moralizing and murky pathos.
"Day", another novel, is much stronger. New incidents and characters are introduced at each stage, raising the hope that the protagonist, a Holocaust survivor, would choose life over death, only to have that hope dashed. The plight of the survivor, his inability to let go of the dead and love the living, is vividly expressed not only through his thoughts but also his actions. I think the original title of the novel, "Accident", should have been retained. Changing it to "Day" in an attempt to complete a trilogy of books that were not written as a trilogy is a mistake.