Open Media

Government in the Future

... Show More
In this classic talk delivered at the Poetry Center, New York, on February 16, 1970, Noam Chomsky articulates a clear, uncompromising vision of social change. Chomsky contrasts the classical liberal, libertarian socialist, state socialist, and state capitalist world views and then defends a libertarian socialist vision as "the proper and natural extension . . . of classical liberalism into the era of advanced industrial society."
In his stirring conclusion Chomsky argues, "We have today the technical and material resources to meet man’s animal needs.We have not developed the cultural and moral resources or the democratic forms of social organization that make possible the humane and rational use of our material wealth and power.
Conceivably, the classical liberal ideals as expressed and developed in their libertarian socialist form are achievable. But if so, only by a popular revolutionary movement, rooted in wide strata of the population and committed to the elimination of repressive and authoritarian institutions, state and private. To create such a movement is a challenge we face and must meet if there is to be an escape from contemporary barbarism."

80 pages, Paperback

First published January 1,1970

Series

This edition

Format
80 pages, Paperback
Published
April 5, 2005 by Seven Stories Press
ISBN
9781583226858
ASIN
1583226850
Language
English

About the author

... Show More
Avram Noam Chomsky is an American professor and public intellectual known for his work in linguistics, political activism, and social criticism. Sometimes called "the father of modern linguistics", Chomsky is also a major figure in analytic philosophy and one of the founders of the field of cognitive science. He is a laureate professor of linguistics at the University of Arizona and an institute professor emeritus at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Among the most cited living authors, Chomsky has written more than 150 books on topics such as linguistics, war, and politics. In addition to his work in linguistics, since the 1960s Chomsky has been an influential voice on the American left as a consistent critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, and corporate influence on political institutions and the media.
Born to Ashkenazi Jewish immigrants in Philadelphia, Chomsky developed an early interest in anarchism from alternative bookstores in New York City. He studied at the University of Pennsylvania. During his postgraduate work in the Harvard Society of Fellows, Chomsky developed the theory of transformational grammar for which he earned his doctorate in 1955. That year he began teaching at MIT, and in 1957 emerged as a significant figure in linguistics with his landmark work Syntactic Structures, which played a major role in remodeling the study of language. From 1958 to 1959 Chomsky was a National Science Foundation fellow at the Institute for Advanced Study. He created or co-created the universal grammar theory, the generative grammar theory, the Chomsky hierarchy, and the minimalist program. Chomsky also played a pivotal role in the decline of linguistic behaviorism, and was particularly critical of the work of B.F. Skinner.
An outspoken opponent of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, which he saw as an act of American imperialism, in 1967 Chomsky rose to national attention for his anti-war essay "The Responsibility of Intellectuals". Becoming associated with the New Left, he was arrested multiple times for his activism and placed on President Richard M. Nixon's list of political opponents. While expanding his work in linguistics over subsequent decades, he also became involved in the linguistics wars. In collaboration with Edward S. Herman, Chomsky later articulated the propaganda model of media criticism in Manufacturing Consent, and worked to expose the Indonesian occupation of East Timor. His defense of unconditional freedom of speech, including that of Holocaust denial, generated significant controversy in the Faurisson affair of the 1980s. Chomsky's commentary on the Cambodian genocide and the Bosnian genocide also generated controversy. Since retiring from active teaching at MIT, he has continued his vocal political activism, including opposing the 2003 invasion of Iraq and supporting the Occupy movement. An anti-Zionist, Chomsky considers Israel's treatment of Palestinians to be worse than South African–style apartheid, and criticizes U.S. support for Israel.
Chomsky is widely recognized as having helped to spark the cognitive revolution in the human sciences, contributing to the development of a new cognitivistic framework for the study of language and the mind. Chomsky remains a leading critic of U.S. foreign policy, contemporary capitalism, U.S. involvement and Israel's role in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, and mass media. Chomsky and his ideas are highly influential in the anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist movements. Since 2017, he has been Agnese Helms Haury Chair in the Agnese Nelms Haury Program in Environment and Social Justice at the University of Arizona.

Community Reviews

Rating(3.9 / 5.0, 61 votes)
5 stars
16(26%)
4 stars
23(38%)
3 stars
22(36%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
61 reviews All reviews
July 15,2025
... Show More

Does it get better than Chomsky? Can anyone with his opinions back them up as effectively as he does with citations from the very powers he speaks against? If you have an interest in politics, this is an absolute must-read. It offers a concise explanation of classic liberalism and libertarian socialism, along with a section on counterarguments that is truly fascinating. There is also a shorter definition of state socialism and state capitalism, as well as an exploration of their shortcomings.


If you have previously read Marx and agreed with him in principle, but feel that his ideas don't quite align with the way capitalism has evolved, or if you think his ideas are a bit dated yet still hold some truth, then you will find this book extremely interesting. Even if you disagree with its contents, this book remains highly engaging. It provides a much better description of politics than what you would typically get from the average Chomsky follower. You know, those burnt-out community college students sporting a Che T-shirt, offering half-baked explanations of theories they only half understand. But enough about me. In conclusion, this is a must-read for anyone with an interest in politics.

July 15,2025
... Show More

On 28 March 2013, an important event took place. However, the details of this event were not initially clear. As time passed, more information began to surface. People were eager to know what exactly had happened. The situation seemed to be evolving rapidly, and everyone was watching with great interest. The media was also closely covering the story, providing updates as they became available. It was a day that would go down in history, and people would remember it for a long time. The significance of the event was yet to be fully understood, but it was already causing a stir. As the hours ticked by, more questions were raised than answered. But one thing was certain, something major had occurred on 28 March 2013.

July 15,2025
... Show More
I am certain that if this book had a more contemporary touch, I might have been convinced to assign it a slightly higher rating. However, there is an abundance of timeless analysis within its pages that still earns it a few stars.

One thing is for sure: whether it was written today or 50 years ago, when you delve into Chomsky literature, you always know what to expect. This book essentially consists of an explanation and critique of the four fundamental styles of modern society from which all typical forms of social governance are derived.

Each analysis explores the way in which government, industry, and the general public interact with one another within these systems. What is contained in the book is a delicious appetizer, but being such a short volume, one can't truly be satisfied with it.

Anyone familiar with Chomsky will be aware that he can and has expounded on these matters at much greater length. However, I imagine that a person picking up this book as their first encounter with Chomsky would likely be somewhat disappointed. It's not that this isn't worth reading; rather, there is much more captivating Chomsky material out there that I would recommend above and beyond it.

July 15,2025
... Show More
Audiobooks have become increasingly popular in recent years. They offer a convenient and accessible way for people to enjoy literature and other forms of written content.

One of the main advantages of audiobooks is that they allow you to multitask. You can listen to an audiobook while driving, exercising, or doing household chores, making it a great way to make the most of your time.

Another benefit is that audiobooks can enhance the listening experience. Professional narrators bring the story to life with their voices, adding emotion and character to the text.

In addition, audiobooks are available in a wide variety of genres, from fiction and non-fiction to self-help and children's books. This means that there is something for everyone, regardless of age or interests.

Whether you are a book lover or simply looking for a new way to consume content, audiobooks are definitely worth checking out. So why not give them a try and see how they can enhance your reading experience?
July 15,2025
... Show More
I truly wish that Dave Rubin would take the time to listen to what I have to say.

It is rather concerning that he continues to identify himself as a classical liberal.

Classical liberalism has a specific set of principles and values that may not necessarily align with his views and actions.

Perhaps if he were to listen carefully, he might gain a better understanding of the true essence of classical liberalism and realize that his self-identification may not be entirely accurate.

It is important for individuals to be honest and self-aware when it comes to their ideological affiliations.

By listening and reflecting, Dave Rubin could potentially make a more informed decision about how he defines himself and his beliefs.

This could lead to a more meaningful and productive dialogue about the ideas and principles that shape our society.

Hopefully, he will have the openness and willingness to listen and consider different perspectives.
July 15,2025
... Show More

A must-read for everyone interested in making democracy work
This short piece is not only excellent in its writing but also carries the reader along effortlessly. It provides a comprehensive historical foundation for understanding our current system of government and economics, and then elaborates on how it functions today. For many, it will be a real 'lifting of the veil' regarding how the government truly operates. It serves as a fact-filled reminder of reality, as are all of Chomsky's works. What we naively consider as democracy and freedom in the US is, unfortunately, neither. This is not a crazy left-wing rant but a horrifying, deep truth.
The concentration of wealth into fewer and fewer hands has increased exponentially since WWII. Corporations now have unspeakable power through limitless campaign contributions guaranteed by the US Supreme Court. Originally published in 1970, the factors and processes that Professor Chomsky so skillfully (and with a dry sense of humor) described not only remain relevant but are even more deeply and invisibly entrenched. My only disappointment was that Chomsky did not offer explicit ideas on how to reverse the current problems that, aside from perpetuating inequalities and hardships among the lower 99 percent of us, are also pushing us towards the climate change cliff because the existing system has no incentive to do otherwise. However, he has other books that may address these issues. Onward.
July 15,2025
... Show More
I find myself constantly coming back to Chomsky, yet he continuously manages to make me despise him. I wholeheartedly agree with everything he has to say regarding foreign policy. However, whenever he strays into any other topic, he simply sounds like a buffoon. Here he is attempting to discuss what the future of governance will look like, and for a whopping 80 pages, he essentially states, yup, socialism.

So, that's the entire book in a nutshell. While I completely concur with him, this is just an idiotically written piece. Why does he feel the need to churn out so many of these books that are merely interviews where he repeats the same things over and over again? What compels him to do this? It's truly baffling.

Perhaps he believes that by inundating the market with his ideas, he will have a greater impact. Or maybe he simply enjoys the attention and the platform that these books provide. Whatever the reason, it's clear that his writing style leaves a lot to be desired.

I can't help but wonder if there's a better way for him to convey his message. Maybe he could focus on writing more in-depth and well-structured books that explore his ideas in a more comprehensive and engaging manner. That way, he might be able to reach a wider audience and have a more lasting impact.

Until then, I'll continue to be frustrated by his work, even as I grudgingly承认 the validity of some of his views.
July 15,2025
... Show More
Here, Noam Chomsky offers a rather one-sided assessment of the modern bourgeois era of society.

On one hand, he correctly points out some of the issues plaguing this era. However, his presentation of a future vision seems rather simplistic and unsubstantiated.

He discusses four political perspectives on the role of government: classical liberalism, libertarian socialism, state capitalism, and state socialism. Right from the start, it's clear he has a preference for libertarian socialism, which he views as an outgrowth of classical liberalism. But his treatment of state capitalism and state socialism is rather haphazard, lumping them together without much in-depth analysis.

The section on classical liberalism is highly idealistic. It fails to connect the ideals of liberalism in the 18th century with the material conditions that gave birth to it and which it in turn helped shape. In particular, while he emphasizes liberalism's focus on individual liberty and freedoms, he conveniently ignores the central importance that most major liberal philosophers and theorists placed on the right to private property. The way the bourgeoisie used this right to betray the working masses during the French Revolution is also left out.

The section on libertarian socialism is equally lacking. It essentially claims that all these ideas were good but couldn't be implemented properly in the past, and now they can because "people now want to be free". There is no real explanation as to how this will be achieved. This stands in sharp contrast to Marxist historical materialism, which provides a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of how capitalism led to the growth of the proletariat and the productive forces necessary to meet everyone's needs.

The final section is a disappointment. Chomsky lumps state capitalism and state socialism together, simply dismissing them as authoritarian and contrary to human nature. Most of this section is devoted to geopolitical discussions about American and Soviet imperialism, which, while perhaps accurate for the time, lack the depth and sophistication needed to truly understand these complex phenomena. His continued use of terms like "state capitalism" and "corporate capitalism" also serves to obscure the true nature of capitalism.

Overall, while Chomsky may have some valid points to make, his analysis is ultimately flawed and unconvincing. It's best to approach his work with a critical eye and not take everything he says at face value.
Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.