This is a remarkable book that consists of fragments of history and philosophy, random facts about sand and clouds, and fractured narratives. It is not just a jumble of these elements, however. Annie Dillard attempts to skillfully weave them together, much like a literary version of the Tibetan sand mandala.
She delves into a plethora of profound topics such as life and death, permanence and eternity, individuality in the face of billions, and the question of whether God is responsible for calamity. These are complex questions with no simple answers. Although she inserts a few of her own opinions here and there, by the end, I felt as if I had perused a strange and captivating collection of pages that contained some significant observations amidst a certain amount of extraneous matter. It was not easy for me to distinguish the significant from the superfluous.
To give you a taste, I'll quote a few lines that I marked while reading for various reasons. "There are 1,198,500,000 people alive now in China. To get a feel for what this means, simply take yourself -- in all your singularity, importance, complexity, and love -- and multiply by 1,198,500,000. See? Nothing to it." "Living things from hyenas to bacteria whisk the dead away like stagehands hustling props between scenes." "God is no more blinding people with glaucoma, or testing them with diabetes, or purifying them with spinal pain, or choreographing the seeding of tumor cells through lymph, or fiddling with chromosomes, than he is jimmying floodwaters or pitching tornadoes at towns. God is no more cogitating which among us he plans to place here as bird-headed dwarfs or elephant men...than he is pitching lightning bolts at pedestrians, triggering rock slides, or setting fires... Nature works out its complexities. God suffers the world's necessities along with us, and suffers our turning away, and joins us in exile. Christians might add that Christ hands, as it were, on the cross forever, always incarnate, and always nailed."
Originally posted here: http://www.larynandjanel.com/blog/for-the-time-being-by-annie-dillard
Seeing the open pits in the open air, among farms, is truly a wonder. It's fascinating to witness the bodies twisting free from the soil. However, when a cleaned clay soldier stands upright in a museum case, it seems unremarkable. And this is all that future generations will likely see. No one will display those men who are crushed beyond repair, or their loose parts, or them crawling from the walls. Future generations will unfortunately miss the crucial sight of ourselves as rammed earth.
The first Chinese emperor, Emperor Qin, commissioned 8000 unique clay soldiers to be created and buried alongside his corpse instead of using live soldiers as was the custom then. Fast forward 2000 years, and my younger daughter, intrigued by the commercials for the Terracotta Warriors display at the Royal Ontario Museum, convinced us to visit the city and see the statues. Despite the captivating history of the artefacts, they were presented in a sterile way, behind glass cases with no photography allowed. Fortunately, as the site in China is still being excavated, it appears that some of the statues can still be seen "crawling from the walls" of the dig site.
In For The Time Being, Annie Dillard revisits the question that has likely inspired much of her nonfiction writing: How can an all-powerful God allow suffering? This question has haunted Dillard throughout her life. Although she seemed satisfied with the answer from C. S. Lewis in An American Childhood, here she quotes Lewis again, along with other philosophers, still seeking a more satisfactory response. Dillard's quote, "Why do you never find anything written about that idiosyncratic thought you advert to, about your fascination with something no one else understands? Because it is up to you. There is something you find interesting, for a reason hard to explain. It is hard to explain because you have never read it on any page; there you begin. You were made and set here to give voice to this, your own astonishment," may explain her obsession with this question.
The book is structured in a rigid way, with each chapter divided into sections labeled birth-sand-China-clouds-numbers-Israel-encounters-thinker-evil-now. Each section is filled with what seem like random facts, such as information on human birth defects, the making of a grain of sand, the nature of clouds in art history, paleontology, Kabala and Hasidism, the scale of human tragedy, and random encounters with people and literature. The book makes the case that while God may notice the fall of the smallest sparrow, we humans are no more important or permanent than the clouds in the sky, the grains of sand on the beach, or the buried clay soldiers.
There are several interesting quotes in the book. For example, "There were no formerly heroic times, and there was no formerly pure generation. There is no one here but us chickens, and so it has always been: a people busy and powerful, knowledgeable, ambivalent, important, fearful, and self-aware; a people who scheme, promote, deceive, and conquer; who pray for their loved ones, and long to flee misery and skip death. It is a weakening and discoloring idea, that rustic people knew God personally once upon a time - or even knew selflessness or courage or literature - but that it is too late for us. In fact, the absolute is available to everyone in every age. There never was a more holy age than ours, and never a less." Another quote is, "There might well be a rough angel guarding this ward, or a dragon, or an upwelling current that dashes boats on rocks. There might well be an old stone cairn in the hall by the elevators, or a well, or a ruined shrine wall where people still hear bells. Should we not remove our shoes, drink potions, take baths? For this is surely the wildest deep-sea vent on the earth: This is where the people come out."
While there were many interesting facts and fine writing in For The Time Being, I didn't really like the book. It may have been too idiosyncratic, more of a vanity project than something meant for public consumption. At any rate, I'm not the intended audience. I've enjoyed reading Annie Dillard this year and have encountered some dense writing in her books, but this was the first time I found her dull. More than once, Dillard includes quotes that she finds confusing, such as "Here is a puzzler from Teilhard: 'The souls of men form, in some manner, the incandescent surface of matter plunged in God.' That people, alone of all beings, possess souls is crucial to Teilhard's thought. Crucial also is the incandescence of matter -- its filling the universe to the exclusion of all spirit and spirits, and its blazing from within. Still: What does this sentence mean?"
In the end, I'm left not completely understanding Dillard, and the layers of her writing are too deep for me to fully excavate. However, I did appreciate the bits that she includes that speak to the idiosyncratic thoughts that I also have. For example, "Without a doubt, time is an accident," Maimonides said, "one of the created accidents, such as blackness and whiteness." Also, "We are food, like rolled sandwiches, for the Greek god Chronos, time, who eats his children." And, "Ours is a planet sown in beings. Our generations overlap like shingles. We don't fall in rows like hay, but we fall. Once we get here, we spend forever on the globe, most of it tucked under. While we breathe, we open time like a path in the grass. We open time as a boat's stem slits the crest of the present."
It's interesting that I read this book so soon after Hawking's A Brief History Of Time, in which he states, "According to this theory [strong anthropic principle], there are either many different universes or many different regions of a single universe, each with its own initial configuration and, perhaps, with its own set of laws of science. In most of these universes the conditions would not be right for the development of complicated organisms; only in the few universes that are like ours would intelligent beings develop and ask the question: 'Why is the universe the way we see it?' The answer is then simple: If it had been different, we would not be here!" Perhaps the strong anthropic principle also applies to God: Suffering is allowed on small and large scales because only those who are capable of suffering have the intelligence to ask the question, "Why?"