Boston Marriage by David Mamet presents a play with snappy and funny dialogue, an engaging situation, and some interesting action. However, one might wonder about the purpose behind it all. If you have a keen interest in the'situation' and find yourself otherwise unoccupied, it could be worth a read. Otherwise, it's a bit of a toss-up. You may have already guessed the situation from the title, but if not, I won't ruin it for you. It was refreshing to come across something with this unique mix - an older style with a more modern outlook.

Here's a snippet from the play:

ANNA: For what is speech?

CLAIRE: I had often thought, it is the chirping of the birds, minus their laudable disinterestedness.

On the other hand, Arcadia by Tom Stoppard is much, much better. It offers a more profound and intellectually stimulating experience, with its complex themes, intricate plot, and masterful use of language. While Boston Marriage has its charms, Arcadia truly stands out as a杰作 of modern theater.

Now I understand why it is impossible to find the Spanish translation!!

Oscar Wilde meets Stoppard with a hint of Sister George.

This combination is truly an interesting and rather unique one. It's as if these different literary and theatrical elements are colliding in a rather unexpected way.

The mention of Oscar Wilde brings to mind his wit, his flamboyant style, and his iconic works that have left a lasting impact on the literary world.

Stoppard, on the other hand, is known for his complex and intellectually stimulating plays.

And then there's the hint of Sister George, which adds an element of mystery and perhaps a touch of the unconventional.

Together, they create a kind of theatrical and literary cocktail that is impressively pointless, yet strangely captivating.

It makes one wonder what exactly the author is trying to convey or what kind of experience they are attempting to create for the audience or reader.

Maybe it's all about the exploration of different styles and the blurring of boundaries between different art forms.

Whatever the case may be, it's definitely a fascinating and thought-provoking concept.

David Mamet is a renowned playwright who has a penchant for exploring the theme of sexual tension in his works.

He skillfully weaves this element into his stories, creating a palpable atmosphere that keeps the audience on the edge of their seats.

Mamet understands that sexual tension can be a powerful driving force in human relationships, and he uses it to great effect in his plays.

Whether it's the unspoken desires between two characters or the blatant flirtation that leads to something more, Mamet knows how to capture the essence of sexual attraction.

His use of language and dialogue also adds to the sexual tension, with his characters often using double entendres and innuendos to convey their true feelings.

In conclusion, Mamet's love for sexual tension is evident in his work, and it is one of the many reasons why his plays continue to be popular and relevant today.

If you are okay with missing at least half of the jokes and references, this is a bizarre but easy read.

I don't speak Mamet, so I am not able to divine much of the back and forth. However, the zingers that I did get were sharp or hilarious.

Perhaps it would be better to stick with the plays that also offer deeper social commentary. This way, you can not only enjoy the entertainment value but also gain some insights into the society we live in.

While this particular piece may have its moments of humor, it may lack the depth and substance that some readers are looking for.

Nonetheless, it can still be a fun read for those who are simply looking for a lighthearted and easy-to-read piece.

Overall, it's a matter of personal preference and what you are hoping to get out of the reading experience.

Hated it.

Mamet's use of clever and skillful banter or dialogue as the means to convey a story with sexual assault undertones is truly objectionable. What makes it even more concerning is that this is seemingly being explored through female characters, perhaps in an attempt to make it more "palatable" (if that's even possible!).

I have a great deal of respect and admiration for most of Mamet's work. His writing often showcases a unique talent and a deep understanding of human nature and relationships. However, this particular piece fails to meet the standards I have come to expect from him.

The way the sexual assault-y story is presented feels inappropriate and exploitative. It doesn't seem to offer any meaningful or positive exploration of the topic, but rather just uses it as a device to drive the narrative.

Overall, I am extremely disappointed with this work and hope that Mamet will reconsider his approach in future projects.

Extremely clever dialogue! It is not only very funny but also has important things to say about love and the human condition. The play, which is set in the Victorian era, truly reminded me of the remarkable versatility of Manet's great talent. The witty exchanges between the characters keep the audience engaged from start to finish. The exploration of love in this context is both poignant and humorous, highlighting the complex nature of human relationships. The setting of the Victorian play adds an extra layer of charm and authenticity, transporting the viewers back in time. It is a masterful work that combines entertainment with deep insights into the human psyche. Manet's talent is evident in every aspect of the play, from the dialogue to the set design. It is a must-see for anyone interested in great theater and the exploration of love and the human condition.

My favorite work of Mamet is...

Although it is quite evident that Mamet is penning these lesbians with a masculine undertone. To be frank, he perhaps lacks the ability to write in a more diverse or nuanced way when it comes to this particular subject matter. However, despite this shortcoming, I still managed to find certain aspects of the work quite interesting.

The dialogue, in particular, had its moments. There were exchanges that were sharp, witty, and thought-provoking. It was as if Mamet was able to capture the essence of the characters' personalities through their words.

Moreover, the complicated relationships depicted in the story added another layer of intrigue. The interactions between the lesbians were not straightforward, but rather filled with hidden motives, unspoken desires, and conflicts. This made the narrative more engaging and kept me hooked from start to finish.

Overall, while Mamet's approach to writing about lesbians may have its flaws, there were still elements within the work that I found enjoyable and值得 exploring further.

Full disclosure: I used to be employed at the theater where this play had its world premiere.

Regrettably, I missed out on working on the premiere by just one year. However, the show was frequently discussed among the company members in a rather nostalgic manner.

Despite that, I had never gotten around to reading it until now.

The play is set in 1900 and bears a certain resemblance to Oscar Wilde's works. If I were to give a brief elevator pitch for it, I would describe it as "witty banter in the drawing room between proto-lesbians."

This description captures the essence of the play's tone and the nature of the relationships between the characters.

The use of the term "proto-lesbians"暗示了 a time when such relationships were not as openly acknowledged or understood as they are today.

The witty repartee adds a touch of humor and sophistication to the story, making it an engaging and entertaining read.

Overall, this play offers a unique perspective on a bygone era and the complex emotions and relationships that existed within it.

In a constantly changing and seemingly pointless world, the concepts of love and lust take on complex and often intertwined meanings. Love, that deep and profound emotion, has the power to bring warmth, connection, and a sense of purpose. It is a force that can withstand the tests of time and the challenges that life throws our way.

Lust, on the other hand, is more about the physical and the immediate. It is the intense desire that can consume us, driving us to seek pleasure and satisfaction. While lust can be exciting and passionate, it often lacks the depth and durability of true love.

In this ever-evolving world, we are constantly bombarded with messages and images that blur the lines between love and lust. We are taught to equate physical attractiveness with love and to pursue instant gratification at all costs. But true love requires more than just a pretty face or a fleeting moment of passion. It demands commitment, sacrifice, and a willingness to grow and change together.

As we navigate this complex landscape of love and lust, it is important to remember what truly matters. We must strive to find that balance between the physical and the emotional, between the fleeting and the enduring. Only then can we hope to experience the true beauty and power of love in a world that often seems so chaotic and meaningless.

I wanted to give a rating somewhere in-between 3 and 4 stars. Overall, the play was mostly brilliant. I was truly in awe of the dialogue, which was sharp, engaging, and full of life. However, the ending felt rather weak.

One thing I often notice in plays is that in an effort to keep the number of characters to a minimum, some key characters that are discussed never actually show up. In this play, the main characters talk about having a seance with certain people who don't appear. I think it could have been absolutely hilarious if they had.

On a positive note, the Irish maid was truly awesome. I loved her comments and the way she interacted with the other characters. It was quite interesting to see how rude the other characters were to her, which added an extra layer of complexity to the story. Despite its flaws, the play still had many redeeming qualities that made it an enjoyable experience.

I would recommend this play to others, but I would also caution them to not expect a perfect ending.

This piece is really more of a skit than a full-blooded play.

I'm not sure how the rapid-fire, lit-ref laden dialogue would come across on stage. However, it was enjoyable to read.

Nonetheless, it was ultimately unfulfilling and left me feeling a little flat at the end.

Perhaps this is because it didn't have the depth and complexity that a full play typically offers.

The characters may not have been fully developed, or the story may not have had a satisfying conclusion.

Despite this, it did have its moments of entertainment, and the dialogue was lively and engaging.

Overall, it was an interesting read, but it didn't quite hit the mark as a truly great piece of theater.

Maybe with some further development and refinement, it could become something more substantial and fulfilling.

This work is not what I had anticipated from Mamet.

It is humorous, which is a pleasant surprise. The writing is of good quality, with a certain charm.

However, the overall vibe is very different from what I was accustomed to in his previous works.

Perhaps Mamet is exploring new territory here, which is both exciting and a bit disorienting.

The story takes unexpected turns, keeping the reader on their toes.

While the humor adds a lighthearted touch, there is also an underlying depth that makes the work more than just a simple entertainment.

It will be interesting to see how this new direction in Mamet's writing develops in the future.

Overall, despite the initial disappointment due to the difference in vibe, this work has its own merits and is worth reading.