Studies in the History of Greece and Rome

The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture

... Show More
Elite Romans periodically chose to limit or destroy the memory of a leading citizen who was deemed an unworthy member of the community. Sanctions against memory could lead to the removal or mutilation of portraits and public inscriptions. Harriet Flower provides the first chronological overview of the development of this Roman practice--an instruction to forget--from archaic times into the second century A.D. Flower explores Roman memory sanctions against the background of Greek and Hellenistic cultural influence and in the context of the wider Mediterranean world. Combining literary texts, inscriptions, coins, and material evidence, this richly illustrated study contributes to a deeper understanding of Roman political culture.

424 pages, Hardcover

First published December 1,2006

This edition

Format
424 pages, Hardcover
Published
December 30, 2006 by The University of North Carolina Press
ISBN
9780807830635
ASIN
0807830631
Language
English

About the author

... Show More

Community Reviews

Rating(4 / 5.0, 1 votes)
5 stars
0(0%)
4 stars
1(100%)
3 stars
0(0%)
2 stars
0(0%)
1 stars
0(0%)
1 reviews All reviews
July 15,2025
... Show More

As George Orwell astutely stated in "1984": "Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past." This profound observation is vividly illustrated in Flower's book. She delves into the origins of "forgetting" as practiced in ancient Rome, tracing it from the earliest writings to the second century C.E. In the early and mid-republic, families were entrusted with policing their members. Those who transgressed against the state faced swift consequences such as banishment and loss of family connections. This was a drastic measure as the Republic and its status were centered around a group of families that controlled the government. During this period, the punishment of disgraced members did not extend to their families or supporters, unlike in ancient Greece. Consequently, the Republic maintained a well-functioning system. The individual was erased from family memories, but the family remained unaffected, and the person was not erased from the state's memory.


However, all this changed as the Republic began to feel the pressures of Empire. Individuals emerged who not only eliminated a person but also launched violent attacks on the family and supporters of that person. All mentions of the group, from monuments to written texts, were obliterated. In essence, the memory of that person and his (almost always a man) family and supporters were removed from the realm of remembrance. This was particularly evident when Marius and Sulla came to power, although it had its beginnings with the attacks on the Gracchi brothers. The impact of these actions permanently altered the collective memory of the Romans. Worse still, subsequent upheavals would once again rewrite history. This weakened the cohesiveness of Roman identity and poses challenges for modern researchers studying ancient Rome.


Each of the men who rose to prominence through violence and rewrote history not only changed the collective memory but also shaped the future. Because when the present and past are rewritten, those in power have a direct influence on what lies ahead.

Leave a Review
You must be logged in to rate and post a review. Register an account to get started.