This biography of F. Scott Fitzgerald's wife provides a comprehensive account of her entire life. Like Scott, she endured a difficult existence, and they not only complemented each other but also brought out the worst in one another. Their lives were filled with both true love and profound emotional traumas.
From the beginning, her relationship with Scott was intense and passionate. They shared a mutual love for literature and the arts, which initially bound them together. However, as their lives progressed, they faced numerous challenges and hardships.
Scott's alcoholism and financial difficulties took a toll on their marriage, and she often found herself dealing with the consequences. Despite this, she remained by his side, supporting him through his struggles. At the same time, her own insecurities and mental health issues also began to surface, adding to the complexity of their relationship.
Throughout her life, she experienced both joy and sorrow, love and heartbreak. Her story is a testament to the power of love and the strength of the human spirit in the face of adversity.
I truly loathed both of the characters completely by the conclusion of this book.
Zelda was blatantly a spoiled child and was rather unhinged, even prior to her relationship with Fitzgerald. Her parents were largely to blame for raising a young woman who would never conform to society, having been permitted to act scandalously without consequences. It's no surprise she was pursued by numerous young men as she gave all the social indications of being a young lady of loose morals.
After meeting F. Scott Fitzgerald, she clung to him as if her life depended on it, despite the objections of her parents. She would constantly praise him in her letters, profess her undying love, and then taunt him with tales of her exploits with other young men. She did this deliberately, knowing he would rush down south to investigate these exploits rather than just visit her. He should have realized she was baiting him and, as an older man, should have considered the game-playing beneath his notice and sought a more stable romance.
Which brings me to my rant about F. Scott Fitzgerald. In my view, he was just as mentally unstable as Zelda. Like her, he craved constant attention and, if not openly adored, would wallow in alcohol and self-pity. However, in that era, he was able to have Zelda committed to a mental hospital, and it was almost entirely up to him whether she stayed or was released. When a new doctor was assigned to Zelda and had to consult with Fitzgerald, he made many notes stating that he felt F. Scott had a negative impact on Zelda and caused her setbacks. The doctor repeatedly urged F. Scott to stop drinking. The doctors began limiting his visits to her because afterwards she would experience setbacks in her treatment. But he never completely stopped drinking and lost many friends who became afraid of his drunken outbursts. Conversely, he would not allow Zelda to drink at all and monitored her every move. He decided what she could and could not write about. He told her she could no longer dance and should paint instead. He even called the publisher they shared and had the publishing date of Zelda's book postponed until after his own was published. They had written similar fictional books, both largely based on their own lives. He was afraid people would accuse him of stealing her work when, in fact, he was regularly stealing her work, having lifted large portions of his female character's dialogue word for word from Zelda's letters to him.
I skimmed the last two chapters because I simply wanted to be done with it. It rarely takes me this long to finish a book, but since it was on my phone, I would return to it when in waiting rooms or at lunch at work.
Quick disclaimer - I read a different cover edition that the internet promises is the same story, just in more pages than this one, but I obviously cannot promise this. If my review seems to be mistaken, let me know.
I will say - for the amount of times "love" is used in this book, the number of times poor choices and mean actions are justified because of "love", and the tag line of this entire book being "the love of the century", there doesn't seem to be a lot of love going on here. Let alone kindness. Scott used Zelda and was a controlling and manipulative little freak while Zelda clearly has an attachment disorder of some kind.
Let's just say: if this book is portraying true love, I think I'm okay going without.
When researching to try to figure the above out, I discovered that this book started as a masters thesis, and I just have to say - some chunks of it read exactly like that. This isn't necessarily anything against thesis', but merely to point out that a (large) portion of this book is very academic, to the point that it becomes vaguely mind-numbing.
At many points, we just pretty much read step-by-step summarizing of a short story or a novel, with in-text citations (very reminiscent of essays you write in college - which isn't necessarily a style I want to read in my free time).
We also get to read lengthy letter exchanges (which can be 'meh' to 'maddeningly insane' depending on your grip of Time-Period English) which could have easily just been succinctly explained in a sentence with a footnote to a 'Sources' page in the back or something. This really just makes the book a slog, especially because some places just seem utter inundated with quotes and excerpts. Maybe one here and there, but the extent (and length) feels like a sandtrap on the golf course of a narrative.
This book drags on and on and on. Chapters (in my cover edition) that lasted like, 40 or so pages, and felt like pointless rambles that really just ended to end, rather than in a succinct (narrative) place - yeah, this was DEFINATELY a masters thesis. (Again, nothing particularly wrong with that, just not what I love in my free time, as I spend the rest of my life like this - this could also make the book very challenging to people who's hobbies/expertise doesn't involve literary criticism and historical reconstruction/understanding)
And one small thought not related to this book but just based off of what I learned while reading it - the fact that almost all (of not most of) their stories are autobiographical and many of them share the exact same ideas over and over and over again (towards the end of this book I felt myself rolling my eyes as the author summarized and explained what amounts to the same plot like, five separate times). Sometimes I wonder why we've judged certain figures like the Fitzgeralds as the high point of literature. Nearly none of their ideas were original or invented in any way.
This biography, based on extensive research into the history of Zelda and Scott Fitzgerald, presents their complex and intense relationship through letters, friends' recollections, and scrapbook musings. It is truly devastating. They may have been the golden couple of the jazz age, but their lives were far from glamorous. We follow their journey through numerous letters and tumultuous relationships, as they experience the highs and lows of wealth and debt, vitality and crippling health issues, happiness and despair. Both Zelda and Scott met tragic ends, despairing of the dreams they held dear in their youth. Their identities were intertwined, for better or for worse. Zelda is often reflected in the female characters of Fitzgerald's novels, with him even borrowing whole passages from her letters and using them cruelly in his works.
Since this isn't a novel, I can't rate it based on how compelled I was to turn the page. Nevertheless, it offers a sad lesson in marriage and how one decision can shape the rest of your life. I wonder if Zelda would have found happiness and stability if she had married someone else. One thing is certain: Scott would not have achieved the success he did without Zelda, as she was central to his novels The Great Gatsby and Tender is the Night.