The book that you will find a part of yourself in has a rather plain narrative. However, I got a bit tired of the constantly repeated sentences.
"The point I want to make incidentally is this: You must give up your claims and stop saying that your own conscience is enough for you."
The story in the book seems to lack some variety in its expression. The repetitive nature of the sentences makes it a bit monotonous to read. But still, it might have some valuable insights that could potentially resonate with the readers and help them discover something within themselves. Despite the drawback of the repetitive language, the overall message of the book could be quite profound and thought-provoking.
Alın size kendisi için hiç kimse olan bir kişi daha. This sentence implies that there is someone who belongs only to you and no one else. It could be a very special person in your life, perhaps a lover, a best friend, or a family member.
Belki de herkesin gözünde birisi olabilmek için baş vurduğu yöntem buydu. Maybe this is the way that person tries to stand out in everyone's eyes. They might use unique methods or展现出 special qualities to attract attention and be noticed.
Overall, this description seems to be about a person who is very important to you and has their own way of being different and making an impact. It makes you wonder what kind of relationship you have with this person and what makes them so special.
I have a great passion for reading. It is not just a hobby for me, but a source of无尽的 joy and satisfaction.每当我拿起一本书,我就仿佛进入了一个全新的世界,那里充满了奇妙的故事和深刻的思想。Reading allows me to explore different cultures, learn about history, and gain knowledge in various fields. It broadens my horizons and makes me a more understanding and empathetic person. Moreover, reading is a wonderful way to relax and unwind after a long day. I can lose myself in the pages of a book and forget about all the stress and烦恼 in my life.
Pirandello, with his unique and humorous narrative style, ponders and questions about human existence and personality. The protagonist of the novel, "Vitangelo Moscarda", thinks, "Oh, if only we could live without being aware of our existence like a stone or a plant." Starting from himself, Moscardo questions everyone. He wonders whether he is the person he sees himself as or the person others see. To explore this, he makes use of his body, the house he lives in, the city, and the countryside. His deceased father also becomes part of his inquiries. He spends his life thinking about what the person in front of him or others think about him (and these thoughts are never positive).
For his wife and all his friends, he feels as non-existent as he is present, and he justifies himself by saying that he has never really existed. He thinks that none of the Moscardas seen by each of these people in our hero coincides with the "I" who is nothing to him; indeed, he says that each of those many Moscardas is much more real than me who has no real self. Can a person be so cruel, so skeptical, so insecure, and so hurtful towards himself? How much of this negativity can he bear? Maybe the transition to madness is not that difficult.
"Why does a person who is thinking about suicide imagine that he is dead not for himself but for others?" This is an example sentence I chose from the sentences in the book. There are dozens of such sentences that prompt people to a disturbing thought. If I say that it is "The Book of Restlessness" written in Italian, perhaps I am not exaggerating. Although I don't feel the restlessness I felt when reading Pessoa here. When I finished the book, I asked myself: What would the world be like if every person had a "Genge"?
Since our author is also a playwright, he has constructed the story in the language of everyday conversation, with monologues. However, sometimes it seems as if he has copy-pasted what some characters think about themselves or others, so I often felt that I had "read this before". Although this made my reading a bit less enjoyable, overall I can say that I read it easily. However, I would like to point out that I read some sentences twice, and these sentences, which are rich in content, became understandable after the second reading. Although it is written in a humorous language, since it is a rather philosophical novel, one should not expect a quick read. If I say it is a literary "theory of addition", am I exaggerating? I think you should read it with a calm mind at some point.