...
Show More
This book was so difficult to get through.
I have been trying to read one financial book a week. I love Suze Orman, Dave Ramsey. I enjoyed the Millionaire Mind; I found it inspiring. I did not enjoy the Millionaire Next Door.
This book is heavily recommended on so many of the financial online forums and blogs I read, so I borrowed it from my library this week.
I found the first chapter very interesting, and then they lost me. I think the premise of this book could be summarized into one chapter. But then, you can't sell a book on one chapter!
I do not think the writing is good. The authors are annoyingly repetitive. I think they bored their editor so much that the editor didn't catch that they repeat sentences over, and over, and over. The book is fluffed out with tons of boring, didactic charts. The writing is not organized - at times, it seems like streams of conscientiousness writing- jumping around too much.
I think they completely lost my interest on page 75 when they write: "How else does one explain why two experts on wealth are not wealthy? in part, because they spent a combined total of nearly 20 years pursuing higher education."
So on page 106 they tell a great story of Mr. Martin who won't hire advisers who don't have personal accounts of at least $200,000, because otherwise they are "full of baloney." But back on page 75, they admit they are poor themselves! So why should I listen to their advice??
They spend a lot of time on topics that completely lose my interest. To spend pages showing how rich guys typically buy cars by the pound, and then to review how many pounds each car weighs ...this really put me to sleep. They list the cars millionaires typically buy, and then to go on to list pretty much every car in existence. Or to review for pages and pages the ancestral backgrounds of the 3,000 millionaires they happened to pick from geocoded neighborhoods proves nothing to me.
But then the authors lose confidence, and slap a disclaimer- quietly- on page 228. "we have gone out of our way to emphasize that there are no sure steps one can take to become wealthy." . But wait. Then what are the other 254 pages about? I am lost again. Because they spend a whole lot of time enumerating some pretty sound steps that millionaires take to get wealthy (1. they live well below their means. 2. they allocate...)
Most importantly, there were 5.3 million households in America in 1997 (when the book was written) that were millionaires. Yet they only interviewed 3,000 households. To put forth statistics as "typical" based on the low percentage they interviewed can't possibly be accepted as statistical or fact.
On page 249, they review that they chose the millionaires they surveyed based on geocoded neighborhoods- but this goes against what they spent 248 pages proclaiming! They spend the entire book professing that millionaires don't live in certain neighborhoods, then go on to say they only know this because they surveyed certain probable high-net-worth neighborhoods.
With all this said, I am not disagreeing with any of the tenants of wealth accumulation they advocate- I follow them myself, and highly, highly recommend them! So I reluctantly recommend people read the book just to glean that bit, but with hesitance because I understand they will have to sort through boring charts, stereotyping, and bad writing to get advice. Readers would be better off reading a Ramsey book, which is captivating and not doesn't drown out the message with boring stats. There is some good insight in here - live below your means, don't spend 10 years in advanced education with hundreds of thousands of dollars in student loans to hold you back, invest your money at an early age, don't cripple your children by making them economically dependent, teach your children to fish, don't get caught up with keeping up with Joneses, work hard, plan, pick a compatible spouse, use a budget, track your spending, etc. All of this is great advice.
According to .05% of the millionaires in America.
I have been trying to read one financial book a week. I love Suze Orman, Dave Ramsey. I enjoyed the Millionaire Mind; I found it inspiring. I did not enjoy the Millionaire Next Door.
This book is heavily recommended on so many of the financial online forums and blogs I read, so I borrowed it from my library this week.
I found the first chapter very interesting, and then they lost me. I think the premise of this book could be summarized into one chapter. But then, you can't sell a book on one chapter!
I do not think the writing is good. The authors are annoyingly repetitive. I think they bored their editor so much that the editor didn't catch that they repeat sentences over, and over, and over. The book is fluffed out with tons of boring, didactic charts. The writing is not organized - at times, it seems like streams of conscientiousness writing- jumping around too much.
I think they completely lost my interest on page 75 when they write: "How else does one explain why two experts on wealth are not wealthy? in part, because they spent a combined total of nearly 20 years pursuing higher education."
So on page 106 they tell a great story of Mr. Martin who won't hire advisers who don't have personal accounts of at least $200,000, because otherwise they are "full of baloney." But back on page 75, they admit they are poor themselves! So why should I listen to their advice??
They spend a lot of time on topics that completely lose my interest. To spend pages showing how rich guys typically buy cars by the pound, and then to review how many pounds each car weighs ...this really put me to sleep. They list the cars millionaires typically buy, and then to go on to list pretty much every car in existence. Or to review for pages and pages the ancestral backgrounds of the 3,000 millionaires they happened to pick from geocoded neighborhoods proves nothing to me.
But then the authors lose confidence, and slap a disclaimer- quietly- on page 228. "we have gone out of our way to emphasize that there are no sure steps one can take to become wealthy." . But wait. Then what are the other 254 pages about? I am lost again. Because they spend a whole lot of time enumerating some pretty sound steps that millionaires take to get wealthy (1. they live well below their means. 2. they allocate...)
Most importantly, there were 5.3 million households in America in 1997 (when the book was written) that were millionaires. Yet they only interviewed 3,000 households. To put forth statistics as "typical" based on the low percentage they interviewed can't possibly be accepted as statistical or fact.
On page 249, they review that they chose the millionaires they surveyed based on geocoded neighborhoods- but this goes against what they spent 248 pages proclaiming! They spend the entire book professing that millionaires don't live in certain neighborhoods, then go on to say they only know this because they surveyed certain probable high-net-worth neighborhoods.
With all this said, I am not disagreeing with any of the tenants of wealth accumulation they advocate- I follow them myself, and highly, highly recommend them! So I reluctantly recommend people read the book just to glean that bit, but with hesitance because I understand they will have to sort through boring charts, stereotyping, and bad writing to get advice. Readers would be better off reading a Ramsey book, which is captivating and not doesn't drown out the message with boring stats. There is some good insight in here - live below your means, don't spend 10 years in advanced education with hundreds of thousands of dollars in student loans to hold you back, invest your money at an early age, don't cripple your children by making them economically dependent, teach your children to fish, don't get caught up with keeping up with Joneses, work hard, plan, pick a compatible spouse, use a budget, track your spending, etc. All of this is great advice.
According to .05% of the millionaires in America.