I was extremely excited when I started to read this Banks. My anticipation was high, and I truly wanted to love it. However, to my disappointment, it failed to meet my expectations. The story had four alternating main characters, which unfortunately led to me caring only about 1/4 as much for each one. It was difficult to develop a deep connection with any of them when the focus kept shifting. On the positive side, I didn't mind the phonetic speech portions at all. In fact, I found them rather interesting and they added a unique flavor to the story.
Happily, this experience will not deter me from reading more of Iain M. Banks (IMB) in the future. I still have a couple of his Culture novels patiently waiting to be read. I firmly believe that every author has their off days, and this one book does not represent the entirety of his work. I am looking forward to exploring the other novels and seeing what else Banks has to offer.
"Criptosfera" is a short novel by Iain M. Banks, not related to his more famous "Culture" cycle.
This presentation is bound to lead to an error and then a huge surprise. Despite being short and "single," "Criptosfera" is an innovative and visionary novel, but also rather heavy and crowded. Crowded with visions, characters, huge architectural structures, and different levels of virtual reality. It is a rather difficult novel to read: many have made the mistake of thinking it is a simple short story and have found themselves facing a novel that really asks a lot of the reader.
Firstly, it is a highly visionary novel. It is the ideal heir of "Neuromancer": in a distant future, those who have remained on Earth live a complex life, having overcome death, embedded between physical and virtual reality, thanks to the adoption of particular implants. However, the similarities end here: in contrast to Gibson's dark cyberpunk setting, in an Earth that still seems like ours, among drugs, crime, and yakuza, there is a dreamy and hazy scenario, an unrecognizable planet characterized by huge, improbable, and anachronistic castles (complete with kings and councils). The whole novel is permeated by a dreamy atmosphere, the visions seem like those of a dream, elusive as only the most absurd dreams know how to be.
The difficulty in reading lies not only in the setting but also in the story, of course, whose narration is fragmented into four distinct points of view, and everything is only explained to the reader at the end. As if that weren't enough, the author seems almost to want to challenge the reader, making the reading even more complex by resorting to linguistic experimentation. And so, if the novel begins with Asura's awakening, confused throughout the first chapter, speaking in short sentences and infinitives, the fourth point of view is that of a dyslexic character. What many have mistaken for a translation error (sic!) is actually an inevitable adaptation: in English, it is possible to write in phonetic transposition, in Italian, the words and letters had to be distorted.
But at this point: can the (intended) difficulty in reading be a symptom of a bad or, on the contrary, a beautiful novel? If I have found such choices of the author appreciable, on the other hand, the whole novel is extremely innovative from many points of view; it has now been surpassed by writers who, following this path, have managed to go further (I immediately think of Wright and Stross), but this cannot take away Banks' merits.
It's a truly confusing book, yet it has a certain allure that makes you extremely curious about its mysterious world and captivating plot. However, the phonetic writing of one of the points of view (POVs) was really a killer for me. On one hand, it's kind of cool to have the way I usually read challenged, as it forces me to step out of my comfort zone. But on the other hand, I never really got attached to this particular part of the narrative because of the phonetic writing. In general, while this book was a fascinating and highly creative novel, my reading experience was somewhat lacking in terms of attachment and emotional responses. I found myself more focused on trying to understand the complex plot and the unique writing style rather than truly connecting with the characters on an emotional level.