It is truly sad that it has ended up as a fragment. The lengths and leaps in the text could have been filled, as the notes at the end of the book provide information. The notes themselves! What we have here is the book of a youth, but what is lacking is the book about the Algerian uprising and Camus' perspective on it. What a pity that this (!) book was not written further. "Christ did not come as far as Algeria," it says in a fragment at the end; that says it all. And then there are the side remarks about J.'s life with four women at the same time - he lived "thus an empty life". The comparison with de Beauvoir's "Ménage a trois" could have been exciting... But never mind. The fragment is here, and it is a touching book about growing up in poverty. It almost seems as if the series of almost sociological life memories, dedicated to class differences and the formative power of origin (most recently "Return to Reims" by Didier Eribon!), began with Camus. While reading, I understood why Camus and Sartre could not understand each other (which I had always regretted until then). What worlds lie between the two, between the bourgeois child and the child of an illiterate! So what? Camus shines through loving descriptions of his sometimes disabled or emotionally restricted relatives due to poverty, especially of his uncle, mother, and grandmother. And he shines through the translation with his precise, dryly poetic language. The "love" (for the all-too-human) incidentally springs from a deep gratitude that the narrator also feels towards his elementary school teacher and expresses in later letters to him. The old man's reply letter (both in the appendix) to his most famous pupil, whom he still does not prefer over the others, is a telling testimony of successful pedagogy by a professional. Just for that, the reading was worthwhile. Yes, and because it is about Africa, about the rain, about Algiers... Whether the palm tree in front of the airport where I cut my name in 1970 still stands? ;-) Well, that doesn't belong here. Whoever likes to enjoy literature beyond excitement and pure entertainment at its highest level should read "The First Man". Five stars because it is highly recommended great literature!
“Because,” Cormery continued, “when I was extremely young, astonishingly foolish, and incredibly alone … you took notice of me. And, in a seemingly effortless way, you opened for me the door to everything that I hold dear in this world.”
At that tender age, Cormery felt adrift and lost. But then this person came along, and without making a big show of it, they changed his life. Their simple act of paying attention was like a ray of light in the darkness. It was as if they knew exactly what he needed, even if he himself didn't. And by doing so, they introduced him to all the wonderful things that would come to mean so much to him.
This moment was etched in Cormery's memory, a reminder of the power of a kind gesture and the impact it can have on someone's life. It was a turning point, a moment that set him on a new path and filled him with a sense of hope and possibility.
On page 332, one of the notes Camus has on his manuscript is that the book has to end unfinished. It has to stay open. In a cruel irony, this has been the case; the book will remain eternally unfinished. And yet it is this aspect that, in my opinion, contributes to the quality of the story. One of the criticisms I have acquired of Camus thus far is the constant use of the “sad troubled man who is sad and troubled but also a man-whore and fucks many women.” From the information gathered from the notes collected at the end of the book, it seems to me that this book would have gone in this direction had Camus had the chance to finish it. However, the book doesn't have this.
Which brings me to my first point. The reason I am not giving this a full 5 stars and am sticking to 4.5 is that I fear that large parts of what I loved about this book would not have made the final cut if Camus actually did finish it. Maybe this is me doing exactly what I would implore you not to do, but it feels wrong to completely ignore this aspect. And so, 4.5 it is.
On that note: there are those who argue that this book ought not to have been published at all because it was never actually finished. I strongly disagree. I feel there is no point in focusing on the flaws in unfinished writing when we know that it couldn't be finished in the first place. If this book had not been published, the world would have missed out on incredible storytelling, and I would have missed out on a wonderful experience.
First of all, I am absolutely in love with the description of the childhood. It is no secret that Camus is a talented writer with a gift for prose, but it must be said that the way he manages to convey an atmosphere is truly unmatched. Feeling, heat, environment, and people – all of it is flawlessly translated onto paper in a way that is almost magical.
The second thing that really struck me about this book is that it is a (personal) history told through people, rather than just events. Considering the fact that most of the book still concerns his childhood and not yet his adulthood, this fits extremely well. Children perceive the world around them through the people around them in a way that adults do not. Camus limits your view to the day-to-day and, by doing so, gives you the eyes of his main character. You see what is meant to be shown. And it is bitterly beautiful.