John Cheever's journals offer a fascinating glimpse into his life and creative process. In 1968, he wrote that having nothing better to do, he read two old journals. What emerged were two astonishing contests, one with alcohol and one with his wife. Until 1975 when he got sober, the entries alternated between marital standoffs in an alcoholic haze and lyrical celebrations of life. The gin-soaked husband and the leaping faun within him were constantly at odds.
Cheever's relationship with his wife Mary was complex. She appears as an enigmatic figure in the journals, a stranger sharing his house. Their evenings often ended with them in separate rooms, yet in the morning, he would feel a rush of consciousness and be primed for creativity or activity until the bottles in the pantry called to him again.
Updike's review of the journals underrates their literary importance. Reading them after decades of admiring Cheever's stories, Updike found only rawness and repetition. However, the journals show a daring confessional voice, candid yet solipsistic. They also reveal the intense contests within Cheever, between spleen and ideal, responsiveness and ennui, and between different aspects of his identity. The journals are worth reading not only for their literary merit but also for the insights they provide into the life of a great writer.
The prose in the journals is chiseled and luminous, a daily exercise of Cheever's devotion to writing. Even in the face of his illness and approaching death from cancer, his entries are poignant. The last entries are among the saddest, as he struggles to keep the journal and yet still affirms the power of good prose. Accepting the National Medal for Literature two months before his death, he declared that "a page of good prose remains invincible," astonishing those assembled with his faith.
When a writer gets serious about diaries, it is usually a revealing experience for the reader. Not only to get to know the writer himself, but also to understand his view of the world, how he describes his reality and even connect experiences with the reader himself. This is the case. Cheever paints his reality and the one that surrounds him in a complex and interesting way, just like his fictional work.
The first thing that caught my attention is the number of times Cheever describes road trips and the experiences he feels according to what he sees. There is something in that ownerless and timeless space that reflects him, that makes him feel free and sad at the same time. He talks about the darkness of the road, of some light he sees, of some people he crosses paths with in their total fleetingness, without getting involved. This last thing is something that Cheever has very present: he is constantly fighting against his essence, no one really knows him and that leads him to sadness and alcohol.
That sadness is often underlined by how he describes his relationship with his family, whom he loves, but at the same time would like to leave aside to go far away. I clarify that it is a mental state rather than a physical one, because even when he travels (Rome for example), he has trouble enjoying. Occasional sex and the consumption of drinks also reflect that sadness, so the whole book is clouded by that feeling.
There is a fragment in which he talks about his wife's difficult childhood and how that generates a wearing relationship in them; Cheever would seem to take advantage of it as an excuse for his alcoholism, but in reality he uses it to justify his marriage: he prefers that mostly boring and routine life of a stable family to the adventures of a bachelor. Alcohol and fights, then, are for him mere secondary anecdotes, appendages of a type of life that he does not want to lose. In this fragment, the rain is also in the background.
Rodrigo Fresán's edition provides necessary context to many parts although I feel that sometimes he goes off on a tangent with the annotations. However, it does not fill the book, but rather appears punctually, which is appreciated.