The exemplary spectator is the one who understands that sports is a benign illusion, the illusion that order is possible. It is a form of society free from rats and that does not harm the unborn in any way; organized so that everyone follows exactly the same rules; electronically controlled, which reduces the human margin and benefits the industry; that eradicates the inefficient and penalizes the guilty; that always has a tendency towards perfection.
The novel is set in the 1970s, when the Cold War was in full swing. The protagonist is a college American football player harassed by apocalyptic visions due to a possible nuclear war and fascinated by its potential effects: diseases, fires, genetic chaos, panic, looting, millions of deaths. He shares this obsession with a professor/major in the army, who teaches a nuclear weapons course at the university.
The war story is combined with exciting and fun narrations of college games full of physical pain and much sacrifice. Something very similar to war.
- What is that photo that is stuck to the wall? Who is the girl?
- It is Teresa of Ávila. She was a remarkable woman. A saint of the church. Do you know what she did to remind herself of the end of things? She ate using a human skull as a bowl.
I must be a complete cock, because whenever anyone mentions football, even the august DeLillo, I immediately revert to my Waterboy roots. As I've said elsewhere, it's likely that I'm an original Goodreads asshole. This is especially true for this review, as I was traumatized by high school football and still have nightmares about it. When football ended, I felt like the guy in the novel: "No more football. No more hitting. No more sweat and pain. No more fear."
The format here is the same as will be used later for White Noise: three sections, each with shortish chapters. The second section is the shortest but also coincides with one chapter, the longest in the novel. The middle section/chapter is the thematic center of gravity, like the "airborne toxic event" in WN. It's a howl of outrage that stitches a caesura in the novel's pulsebeat.
The novel opens with the great premise of the first black student at Logos College in West Texas as the new star tailback, and the narrator as an "exile or outcast." These are haunted figures, but it's not a sustained examination of either. The narrator is homo sacer in Agamben's meaning. The tailback and the exile are closely tied, and the narrator's exile is generally not unaesthetic, except for the silence. The locus is a place so flat and bare that it suggests the end of recorded time, similar to the imaginary of Blood Meridian and The Road.
The text is reminiscent of Ratner's Star as the narrator has extraordinary confrontations. Some characters have silly names, and the best is the roommate who wants to "unjew" himself. The novel also presages Ratner's Star with the idea of radio astronomers communicating with beings at the ends of the universe. DeLillo must have played football, as his coach characters capture all the annoying mantras. The narrator takes military theory courses and becomes enamored of the contemplation of death. The marketing copy's interpretation of the text as equating football and warfare is wrong, as the text clearly rejects this.
The novel does draw some parallels between football and warfare, as well as between the lexicon of nuclear strategy and business school economics. The linguistics in the novel ties to Bakhtinian grotesque realism through the "new asceticism." The narrator's girlfriend embraces the carnivalesque by declining the responsibilities of beauty. The narrator looks up words in the dictionary, and we see the application of apotheosis in the novel. Someone is taking a course in "the untellable," and we come full circle with homo sacer. Recommended for those who appreciate the slowly gliding drift of identical things and readers who go through the motions and the motions seem to reciprocate.
Don DeLillo is truly remarkable. He is just so incredibly great. And this particular novel stands out as the absolute best one about sports that I have ever had the pleasure of reading. The reason it is so outstanding is that it doesn't really matter that it is about sports.
He writes, "I reject the notion of football as warfare. Warfare is warfare. We don't need substitutes because we've got the real thing. The exemplary spectator is the person who understands that sport is a benign illusion, the illusion that order is possible." This profound statement makes us think deeply about the true nature of sports. It's not just about the action on the field but about the ideas and concepts that lie beneath the surface. DeLillo's ability to explore these themes in such a masterful way is what makes this novel a must-read for anyone interested in sports or literature.
This is indeed a very good article. It contains a wealth of useful information that can provide valuable insights and knowledge to the readers. The content is presented in a clear and concise manner, making it easy to understand and follow. Whether you are a beginner or an experienced reader, you will find something of interest in this article. It covers a wide range of topics and offers practical tips and advice that can be applied in real life. Overall, it is a great piece of writing that is well worth reading.
It has happened to me, quite frequently in fact, to read more or less veiled criticisms of this or that publishing house for the publication of a youthful work by a successful author. With the keyboard soiled by a certain assumption and an attitude bordering on snobbery, such publications were branded as mere "commercial operations", forgetting - among other things - that a publishing house is also a business and as such must aim to achieve a profit that guarantees its survival and, consequently, the possibility of publishing all the books we love so much.
There is more: except in very specific cases (I have one in mind but I wouldn't confess it even under torture), these forms of rediscovering youthful works I LIKE. I'll be brutal, but two thoughts come to my mind that can follow the reading of the youthful novel of an author I appreciate: if it were to be a half-baked work, the result would be comforting ("ok, not everyone is a genius, there's hope for all of us"). Vice versa, if the result were to be convincing, one would have been able to deepen the path taken by an author, that road strewn with phrases and words that led him to write our cult novel. In short, one triumphs in any case.
Although it concerns an author who, also because of his origins, is really very much loved in Italy, the publication in our country of "End zone", Don DeLillo's second novel dating back to 1972, is rather recent. And we are clearly in the second of the two possible scenarios I have described: in a form that certainly suffers from the not yet reached maturity, the young DeLillo shows us how already in his first narrative attempts there were themes and colors that distinguish his subsequent works, first and foremost that great masterpiece published under the title "Underworld".
"End zone" can serenely fall within the happy round of the so-called coming-of-age novels: the protagonist, Gary Harkness, is a young man from the state of New York who, due to a series of vicissitudes, has ended up in a small college in Texas to try to improve the fortunes of the local team, a reality certainly far from the most titled American universities.
It is the occasion for a frankly interesting narrative proposal: I'm not sure, but I imagine that American football teams are not teeming with literature and philosophy enthusiasts and constitute a universe in which cultural interests lag kilometers behind the passion for cheerleaders and that for hard liquors. DeLillo plays on this stereotyped image and creates a group of friends and players used (also) to reasoning about philosophy and poetry, with ties that vaguely recall those from "The Fugitive Moment" but that essentially refer to the present history. Thus, football becomes a perfect metaphor for war (Vietnam was still on the minds of Americans), adolescent fears are reflected in the fears of a nuclear holocaust (we are in full confrontation between the Western and Soviet blocs), the coach - a displaced person who lives in a tower that dominates the playing field - is called Creed ("Belief").
There is a lot, really a lot of the mature DeLillo. There is a lot of "The Falling Man", an exemplary novel of the post-September 11 American mindset. There is the whole path of an author still in the bud, but already great.
--- review published on http://www.masedomani.com/2015/03/24/... ---
Don DeLillo indeed has an undeniable talent when it comes to handling language and描绘 landscapes. However, in this particular novel, it seemed to me that it got a bit lost beneath the weight of its own narrative. The themes were clearly present, but the structure was rather weak. Moreover, the speaker's voice appeared to blend into that of the other (male) characters. It was somewhat like the recognition theory, where the "profound" conversations were those that mirrored his own speech and perspective on the world. In a sense, everyone was a caricature, dynamic yet not fully developed - merely a mouthpiece for the speaker's obsessions with asceticism, death, and jargon. It's as if the novel was trying to convey so much but ended up not quite hitting the mark in terms of overall coherence and character depth.