Not usually one to diss books, but maaaaaaaaaaaaaan, Orhan, what the fuck do you mean? This kind of reaction might seem a bit extreme at first glance. However, when we encounter a book that challenges our expectations or leaves us completely baffled, it's natural to have such a strong response. Maybe Orhan's work has taken a direction that we didn't anticipate, or perhaps the ideas presented are so complex and unfamiliar that we struggle to make sense of them. It could also be that the writing style doesn't resonate with us. But rather than simply dismissing the book out of hand, it might be worth taking a closer look and trying to understand what Orhan was trying to achieve. Maybe there are hidden depths and meanings that we haven't yet uncovered. So, while our initial reaction might be one of confusion or frustration, let's not be too hasty in judgment.
Isn't it better to leave it without commenting? We cannot allow what will be written to overshadow what has already been written. Still, the first book I read by Pamuk was "New Life". With all those familiar moments, the path on which Osman set off and led us too, the story told in the light of any house in the village/town/countryside through which that well-known path passed. "New Life", a narrative in verse with an allusion to Dante, the story he told with the character created by the romance in the church penance ceremony...
"I was nowhere and everywhere and therefore, it seemed to me that I was at the non-existent center of the world."