It is really tiresome to read so many people criticizing a novel for the wrong reasons. The protagonist is by no means stereotypical. On the contrary, his inner life is of such richness and delicacy that only Updike could have conferred upon an extremist. And so, to be uncomfortable because someone willing to blow up hundreds of "infidels" is portrayed as constantly repeating passages from the Quran to himself and does not have an inner voice of a liberal-arts-educated person like oneself is the height of baseness.
We should look beyond the surface and try to understand the deeper meaning and purpose behind the author's portrayal. Maybe Updike is trying to show the complexity and contradictions within a person, even one who holds such极端 views. By presenting the protagonist in this way, he is challenging our own preconceived notions and making us think more deeply about the nature of extremism and the human psyche.
Instead of simply dismissing the novel as offensive or inappropriate, we should engage with it in a more thoughtful and meaningful way. Only then can we truly appreciate the artistry and skill of the author and gain a deeper understanding of the world around us.