Entertaining, thought-provoking, technically brilliant, and timely. It's also timely in its connection to another highly praised book, Howard Jacobson's The Finkler Question, the recent Man Booker winner. Coincidentally, a friend gave me her copy of Roth's work on the same day I bought Jacobson's; neither of us linked the two. But now, having thoroughly enjoyed both, I'm amazed at how closely Roth anticipates Jacobson 34 years later. Both authors handle the same subjects - male libido and Jewish identity, not necessarily in that order - in the same context (Roth's book is partly set in England, Jacobson's entirely). They also use the same sardonic humor (though Jacobson spells it "humour"). Regarding contemporary events, the 3.5-decade time gap seems insignificant: Roth refers to Western condemnation of Israel's actions in the Yom Kippur War; Jacobson's characters worry similarly about Gaza. Both writers venture into the area between antisemitism and paranoia; Roth is more neurotic, but his satire has more bite, and in my opinion, he's the greater author.
Roth has two constant themes in his work: Judaism and sex. The Counterlife explores both, albeit from an indirect perspective, as his characters aren't devout Jews nor always sexually capable. The book starts with Henry Zuckerman, a successful Newark dentist under forty, impotent due to a side effect of his heart medication. Sex was what he once enjoyed (with both a mistress and a wife) but can no longer have. He takes the extreme step of having a risky bypass operation to make a radical change in his life. In the next section, Roth presents a different outcome for Henry's story, where he abandons his comfortable American secularism and moves to Israel as a passionate Zionist, living in a militant West Bank settlement and studying Hebrew and Torah. In each of these scenarios, Henry is visited by his older brother, the successful novelist Nathan Zuckerman, who appears in several other Roth novels and is clearly the author's alter ego. Roth (or Nathan) has several other variations in store, but each involves an attempt at a radical life change, moving from the fringes to the heart of an issue. He calls it "the construction of a counterlife that is one's own antimyth […] a species of fabulous utopianism," thus explaining the book's title.
Writing through an alter ego who is a character in the book allows the author to play narrative tricks once called Pirandellian but now labeled post-modern. One, as I mentioned, is the ability to change the story at will. The five sections of the book - Basel, Judea, Aloft, Gloucestershire, and Christendom, though not all set in those places - contradict each other in several significant ways, emphasizing the author's control over the story. The Gloucestershire section (a key to the whole) even changes direction three times in eighty pages; it begins with the author writing about his own funeral and ends with a preview of the final Christendom section, discussed by two characters who will appear in it. While some literal readers may find this confusing, I found it easy to accept the parameters of each section, as if they were the only realities for the time being. The switches not only add intellectual excitement but also deepen the perspective and the seriousness of the issues being addressed, despite Roth's typically flippant tone.
While Judaism and sex continue to vie for attention, the sexual aspects are ultimately secondary. It's more about a midlife crisis and the eternal question: Is this really all I am? The answer may be sought through adultery or divorce, or conversely, by a former playboy settling down and starting a family; both are present in this novel. The common element is a radical and often hasty life change, the Counterlife. What makes the book more than just a soap opera is that Roth also poses the who-am-I question in terms of ethnic and religious identity: What does it mean to be a secular Jew in a largely assimilated society? Is it Israel's role to be what he calls the American-Jewish Australia, taking in misfits trying to find themselves as a people? His Judea section is excellent in its portrayal of many different views of that extraordinary society, many extreme, few compatible, but all essentially true. When Nathan claims to find similar battlefields in the dining rooms of Mayfair and the meadows of Gloucestershire, he's exaggerating greatly - but he speaks powerfully to the need of so many of us, Gentile and Jewish alike, to define ourselves in opposition to the world around us, rather than settling for the quiet beauty of the ordinary.
Sono sufficienti 5 anni di decantazione e una rilettura per passare da una valutazione tiepida al massimo dell’apprezzamento? Probabilmente tanti libri sono passati sotto i miei ponti nel periodo intercorso e anch’io sono maturata come lettrice. Tuttavia, sono certa che una grossa parte di merito vada alla nuova e più brillante traduzione.
E’ un libro complesso, un progetto ambizioso. Anche se è godibile, richiede una lettura attenta. Solo così è possibile apprezzare anche la costruzione, rendendo il giusto merito al risultato. Non c’è una trama, anzi ce ne sono molte. È un gioco di incastri tra finzioni: il romanziere che immagina una storia e vive nella realtà immaginata dallo scrittore, i personaggi di questa storia che intervengono per mescolare le carte. È finzione finta o vera? È realtà immaginata o vissuta?
Vale la pena spendere due parole sull’estrema acutezza delle riflessioni. Si tratta dell’identità ebraica, della morte, del caso, del sesso, del solito dilemma fra vita spericolata o ordinaria esistenza. Per chi conosce l’Autore niente di nuovo ma, tanto per ribadire, non capita spesso di trovare libri che coniughino il piacere dell’intelletto con la vera goduria della costruzione letteraria. E questo è, a mio avviso, uno di quegli eventi fortunati.
I started reading the book with the impression that it was an incredibly well-written and intellectual exploration of an incredibly misogynistic and explicit character. As I delved deeper into the story, I still held that view to some extent. However, I also found myself asking more questions about American Jewish identity. The entire reading experience was truly astounding and beautiful.
The author's writing style was engaging and captivating, drawing me in from the very beginning. The detailed character study allowed me to understand the complex nature of the protagonist, despite his flaws. The exploration of misogyny was both thought-provoking and uncomfortable at times, forcing me to confront my own biases and assumptions.
Moreover, the questions raised about American Jewish identity added another layer of depth to the book. It made me reflect on the unique experiences and challenges faced by this community, and how they navigate their identity in a diverse and often hostile society. Overall, this book was a remarkable piece of literature that left a lasting impression on me.