If you come across it in the bookstore, buy it. It's good for expanding your collection. However, if you don't read it, you don't miss out on much.
This statement presents a practical perspective on book shopping. When we encounter a book that catches our eye in the bookstore, there is a temptation to purchase it, especially if we are avid collectors. Buying new books can indeed enhance our collections and give us a sense of satisfaction.
On the other hand, not reading a particular book doesn't necessarily mean we have missed out on a great deal. There are countless books in the world, and it's impossible to read them all. Sometimes, we may buy a book with good intentions but never get around to reading it. In such cases, it's important to remember that the value of a book lies not only in its possession but also in the knowledge and enjoyment it can bring when read.
So, while it's okay to buy books that interest us, we should also be realistic about our reading habits and not feel pressured to read every book we own. Instead, we can focus on reading the books that truly matter to us and make the most of our reading time.
Not entirely certain if I am being just to this particular novel. I did have a certain degree of enjoyment while reading it. I found that it was written quite well, with the exception of perhaps one or two rather feeble points within the plot. However, I must admit that it didn't even manage to send a shiver down my spine. Additionally, I am somewhat growing weary of the whole biblical aspect, even though this story attempts to put a new spin on it. That entire strand of mythology seems to have become rather tired and overused.
Nevertheless, it is still well worth the effort of reading. There are elements within the novel that are engaging and interesting, despite its flaws. It offers a unique perspective on certain themes and ideas, which can be quite thought-provoking. So, even though it may not be a perfect piece of literature, it does have its redeeming qualities and is definitely worth giving a chance.
Wanting to read all of McCammon's works in the next couple of years gives me the opportunity to explore his very early novels. These are the books that the author himself seems to have distanced from. BAAL is the first one. While it's not as bad as McCammon made it out to be, it still isn't outstanding.
BAAL is more serious and mature in tone compared to another of his early works, Bethany's Sin. However, it never quite figures out what it wants to be. What begins as a strong character study about a family dealing with rape and an unwanted pregnancy quickly transforms into a vast tale that spans different continents. It attempts to feel epic but fails rather miserably. It's as if McCammon had an idea but couldn't quite execute it, so he changed it. The book is a jumble, with three parts that have completely different tones and don't quite mesh. We have the family tragedy and BAAL as a youngster with an omen-like feel, then we're plunged into a story about a priest investigating a massive cult following without any clear explanation of how and why it came about. Finally, the last third, while atmospheric and creepy, doesn't match up with anything that came before and ends with a whimper. It doesn't help that the title character disappears for about two-thirds of the book.
It's worth reading for the strong beginning and the creepy ice maze at the end. Everything in between, unfortunately, falls a bit flat.