Review after the second reading in 2021
This is not Simmons' best novel. But it's not the worst either. And you wouldn't call it bad. It's different, and this difference is defined by Hyperion and The Fall of Hyperion. Yes, without these two novels, \\"Endymion\\" would have no sense. But it is written in such a different style that it throws you off balance.
Firstly, this is not a novel for the sake of the plot. It's a novel for the sake of the characters. If in \\"Hyperion\\" they are rather static (although it needs to be re-read), here they develop. Not just revealed to the readers, but actually develop. First of all, I mean Father Captain de Soya.
Secondly, this is a novel with a plot that disguises hints, allusions, and quotes. It seems to contradict the first point. But it's not so. There is a plot in the novel - and it either seems simple, almost primitive, or too dynamic (during the last two hundred pages). But actually, there are many clues hidden in it that connect this novel with \\"The Fall of Hyperion\\", and also - as I suspect - hint at the development of the plot in \\"The Rise of Endymion\\".
To be honest, Simmons is sometimes very straightforward. And sometimes - in his trademark style - he quotes the classics of American literature. Yes, under the influence of Simmons (and Joseph Conrad!), I decided to read Stephen Crane Stephen Crane.
By the way, \\"The Fall of Hyperion\\" has become so blurred that I don't see the contradictions anymore. And those that are there, Simmons explains quite plausibly. Well, it makes sense: there should be some time between the two parts of \\"The Hyperion Cantos\\": as Simmons wrote them with a break, so they should be read with a break :)
And this time I got satisfaction from the novel. Therefore, I'm bravely moving on to The Rise of Endymion!
P.S. Oh, no! I found out that I re-read the novel for... a year. Although there were two reading periods: 28.05.2020 - 15.06.2020 and 21.01.2021 - 22.05.2021. One month of reading, seven months of break, four months of reading. Well, it doesn't matter that it turned out this way. Because the first month of reading was two 30% of the text, then I gave up, and then... And then the novel becomes more interesting ;)
Review after the first reading in 2019
Critics said that the plot here is very confusing. It becomes confusing on the last 150 pages. Before that, everything is simple: the bad guys pursue the main characters. The main characters travel through space on a ship, along a river on a raft... There are no intrigues in this, because every time the bad guys catch up with them, they escape. And only at the end of the novel, Simmons twists the plot - in the style of \\"The Fall of Hyperion\\". Moreover, the text reminds of a very thinly spread layer of events in terms of the amount of text. But even at the end, Simmons doesn't hold back to not spoil the exciting plot - and starts to be inspired by \\"Terminator 2\\": the same twists, the same terminator that can change form, in particular - turn hands into knives. And Simmons even reproduces the scene with the terminator's hand emerging from the molten metal (in Simmons - from the red-hot lava). This is already in bad taste, as far as I'm concerned: Simmons can quote more subtly and skillfully.
But what annoys me the most is that Simmons suddenly starts to contradict \\"The Fall of Hyperion\\". As if it was like that there? But it was all Martin Silen who got it wrong - and misreported. Okay, we accept it. But still, it was like that. Simmons: but actually no, and I won't explain why I changed everything. Or rather, we know why: to develop the plot of \\"Endymion\\". And this happens four times during the text - in key places.
Somewhere from the middle of the novel, I already started to empathize with the bad guys and hope that their mission would succeed... Especially since the characters of the bad guys are more developed.
In conclusion, Simmons wrote a weak novel. Especially compared to \\"The Fall of Hyperion\\". And I don't understand why \\"The Fall\\" almost didn't receive awards, while \\"Endymion\\" was rated on a par with \\"Hyperion\\"...
Rating: 8/10
Endymion is not at all what I anticipated the follow-up novel to be. It presents a vastly different story, centering on an entirely new set of characters. However, some familiar faces do make a comeback, and it feels deeply connected to the Hyperion books. It makes numerous references to previous characters and events, reveals new insights into the lore's past details, and revisits several worlds mentioned in the original novels. It wasn't the direct sequel I was hoping for, and I was slightly disappointed. Nevertheless, Endymion functions superbly as its own epic Sci-Fi adventure novel, and I thoroughly enjoyed it.
Image: God's Grove (A planet within the WorldWeb)
[Pros]:
- The adventure of exploring former Web-worlds was captivating, and learning about their history, ecology, and geology added depth.
- The world-building is truly epic, with the lore of this universe being expanded significantly.
- The new cast of characters was great, and I found them all completely relatable, forging a connection with each one.
- The pacing was good overall, keeping me engaged throughout.
[Cons]:
- There were some retcons that I disliked, as I believe they weakened the previous books in the series.
- There were too many misdirects and fake-out deaths, to the point where it became predictable and lessened the tension in the scenes or chapters.
- The ending was yet another cliffhanger, similar to that of Hyperion.
*My Rating System*
5 Stars (9-10): Amazing
4 Stars (7-9): Really Good to Great
3 Stars (5-7): Average to Good
2 Stars (3-5): Bad to Mediocre
1 Star (1-3): Terrible