It's Chaim Potok, and as expected, the work is of high quality. Very good indeed. However, it's perhaps my least favorite among his books. As always, Potok demonstrates his mastery in character development. Just a few pages in, I found myself emotionally engaged with Gershon. The storyline is expertly crafted, but the ambiguities were a touch too pronounced for my personal preference. I was both charmed and frustrated by the mysticism. At times, I felt as if I was overlooking something crucial that I should have understood, leading me to reread certain passages multiple times without quite grasping what I had missed.
I believe part of this frustration stems from my very limited understanding of Kabbalah and Jewish mysticism. The book does offer valuable insights into this area, yet it also seems to presuppose that the reader has a certain foundation in it. I did appreciate the interesting juxtaposition of light playing a role both in the positive aspects of Kabbalah and in the destructive horror of the death light (atomic bomb).
Undoubtedly, it's a worthy read. However, I have a sense that I might need to read it several times before I can fully appreciate its depth and nuances.
Apr 3, 845am ~~ Review asap.
Apr 2, 8pm ~~ Chaim Potok's 1981 novel The Book Of Lights is as intense as his previous works. The main character, Gershon Loran, has endured a great deal of pain in his life. This begs the questions: Is this the reason he feels disconnected from the world? And is it also the reason the reader feels a disconnection from him? I, for one, never felt that Gershon was as real to me as the main characters in Potok's earlier books. I've attempted to figure out why this is so, but the best conclusion I could reach is that Gershon simply wasn't as present in his own world, and thus couldn't be as present in mine as Asher Lev, Reuven Malter, and Daniel Saunders were.
Daydreaming through school yet somehow emerging as a brilliant scholar, Gershon is plagued by losses, both personal and tribal, during his youth. He's unsure of what he wants to do in life and doesn't seem interested in much. However, two of his teachers see more in him than he himself is aware of, and they try to guide him, often on conflicting paths.
He not only has to face his own personal demons but also the atomic demons unleashed upon the world in the final days of World War Two. He's closer to the source of the bombs than he realizes: his college roommate was the son of one of the men who developed the atom bomb and called Albert Einstein Uncle. Gershon never fully grasps the guilt Arthur feels, but he begins to experience it himself just the same.
And while part of the occupying Army at the end of the Korean War, he wonders how it's possible for a large portion of the world's population to seem quite happy in their beliefs of their own God, never knowing of the existence of his own. How can this be explained? How can it be accepted?
With nearly every book Potok has written, I've wondered just how much of his own life is depicted in the main characters. After finishing this book, I learned that it was intended to be somewhat autobiographical, as Loran faces dilemmas that Potok himself dealt with while serving as a chaplain in Korea. I suppose all writers put a part of themselves on paper; otherwise, how could they follow the rule of writing what you know?
This book is moving and thought-provoking on a much grander scale than just the events that occur in one man's life. It attempts to open the reader's eyes to an issue that impacts the entire world. And it leaves us with the question: What can I do about this?