I vividly recall reading another work by Sinclair Lewis when I was approximately 20 years old. I was truly captivated by his biting humor and the remarkable precision with which he dissected social issues. I have a hazy memory of the book details, but I firmly believe it was 'Main Street.' Regrettably, I cannot offer much praise for Arrowsmith.
The book chronicles the life of Martin Arrowsmith from his childhood well into his late middle years. It is filled with emotional oscillations between leading a comfortable existence as a renowned and respected doctor and forsaking trivial comforts in the pursuit of pure science. Sinclair Lewis elongated the rather simplistic plot - that of a dreamy medic in search of his life's purpose - over a hefty volume of more than 600 pages (in my particular edition). The quest for life's meaning is presented in a circular fashion, commencing from what Arrowsmith envisioned as a student and culminating in his ultimate choice of science over wealth. Accompanying the diffident Arrowsmith, readers encounter static characters, both male and female, deliberately crafted to accentuate the author's perspective. Boisterous yet dim-witted careerists, forgotten idealists, incompetent administrators - we are all familiar with these archetypes. The characters step into the spotlight to either impede or assist the main protagonist, and certain plot twists (such as Arrowsmith's marriage to a woman with a diametrically opposed worldview) seem rather contrived. The author's central theme is the perpetual struggle in life: selfless dedication to science versus the pursuit of monetary gain or, in broader terms, choosing oneself over serving the interests of others.
The book is relatively easy to read, thanks to the elegant prose and engaging dialogues (particularly towards the end of the book), which help to mitigate the moralistic elements. Similar to all literary works of that era, the story features extensive introductions to each character. However, as is often the case with classical literature, these lengthy passages, although not advancing the plot, do not pose insurmountable barriers.
In summary, based on my observations, I can say that I derived some enjoyment from Arrowsmith on a linguistic level, yet I remained unimpressed by its semantic content. After much deliberation between awarding it 2 or 3 stars, I have decided to give the book 2.5 stars, which I have rounded up to three.