Finally, I have completed the cycle of Hyperion Cantos, which is overall very beautiful. However, I cannot agree with those who find the second part even better. For me, it is decidedly less surprising and less interesting than the first part (and I was really counting on a new surprise or an ultimate acme). As already anticipated in the comment on the third book, the religious derivation (context) does not attract me and I don't like it. I hoped that the fourth book would have an ending that would convince me more. Instead, the Christological figure of Aenea seemed excessive to me, although the final explanations work well despite exceeding logic. And the ending, although it gratifies me for its cathartic efficacy, has been too predictable for a long time, despite at least a couple of pages being still moving. The protagonist is colorless and ineffective until the end, and his awakening is nothing special: he is likeable, but, without expecting heroism, he is really more of a narrative sleight of hand than a literary character. The whole thing is also excessively long, considering that it does not have a growing ending, but only a tying up of all the loose ends.
In any case, Simmons leads the donkey to the threshing floor, but he does it with great skill and great elegance, so the final consideration is widely positive.