I read Murdoch’s debut novel over 20 years ago and did not enjoy it. However, I believe that age and reading experience have likely influenced my perspective in the intervening decades. Because I truly relished A Severed Head.
It brought to mind Evelyn Waugh’s caustic comic novels. The main character and narrator, Martin, is rather despicable and extremely obtuse. Nevertheless, as a reader, I found myself feeling sorry for him.
When the book commences, he is departing from the apartment of his much younger mistress, Georgie, to rendezvous with his wife, Antonia. He has no intention of leaving Antonia, despite what he tells Georgie. Martin is quite content with the status quo.
But when Antonia falls in love with her psychoanalyst, who just so happens to also be Martin’s best friend, Martin’s comfortable double life begins to crumble around him.
‘A Severed Head’ encompasses various themes like adultery, incest, betrayal, and suicide. However, right from the very beginning, it truly gave the impression that it was something I might have eagerly devoured in the 1960s or 1970s. But now, I find myself feeling rather indifferent towards it. I continuously kept wondering why she thought this was an engaging story to pen. It seemed like a modern-day bourgeois extravaganza, complete with crates of wine for refreshments. The combination of these themes might have been more captivating during a different era, but in the present context, it fails to hold my attention. Perhaps it's a reflection of how our sensibilities and interests have evolved over time. Despite the potentially provocative nature of the themes, they don't seem to resonate with me in the same way they might have in the past.
There must be countless fantasy stories out there that are more believable than A Severed Head. Whether this is a criticism or a compliment depends entirely on your tolerance for the implausible. Is this book funny? Or is it ridiculous? Perhaps it's both. It undeniably has an almost charming individuality. Heavy and serious topics such as adultery, abortion, incest, and suicide are somehow smoothed over by the implausible reactions and attitudes of the characters, making them seem like actors in a satirical play. The lack of credibility actually leaves room for humor, and behaviors like cheating almost benefit from it. There is so much cheating going on, and the characters' reactions are so emotionless and borderline apathetic that everything takes on an amusing quality.
Although most of the situations are written with the intention of eliciting laughs, they don't always achieve the desired effect. One prime example is as follows: in an overly exaggerated scene, a man becomes violent towards a woman, manhandles her, and hits her repeatedly. Afterwards, he feels very little remorse and recalls the incident with "a certain satisfaction". When he meets her again, this exchange occurs:
I said, "When did you know I loved you?" It was a lover's question.
"When you attacked me in the cellar."
This would have been the perfect opportunity for some semblance of feminine self-esteem to emerge, but guess what? THEY END UP TOGETHER. For crying out loud. Just because they are both rather despicable people, it doesn't mean that this is okay or funny. This type of attitude is always repulsive, even in the context of satire. Men who justify abuse towards women as a manifestation of "love" and women who accept it as a genuine display of affection are both in the wrong. It's just as idiotic as when parents teach little girls that boys are mean to them because they "like" them. As if this excuses their mean behavior. As if this is the kind of "like" that we should encourage and give a stamp of social acceptability to.
On the whole, it was a fun and unusual book, and the diagram of romantic relationships was rather neat, but that's about it. If there was a more serious side to this story, it was buried so incredibly deep beneath a surface that was so flashy and outrageous that it felt completely inconsequential.
Six rather middle-class central characters engage in the rather wild game of bedroom twister. The question that looms large is whether loving many people truly means loving no one at all. This query is highly appropriate for this rather fickle and chaotic schoolyard-like setting. Martin has a deep adoration for his wife, yet also loves his mistress. He even has homosexual fantasies about his friend Palmer while simultaneously longing for Palmer's sister, Honor. Interestingly, he seems to have a fixation on hair, as both his wife and mistress have long, Rapunzel-like hair. Martin's brother, Alexander, is also part of this complex mix. And if it all starts to sound a bit incestuous, be prepared, as Murdoch handles the genuine article in a deliciously understated way, without resorting to sensationalism. After all, this book reeks of the author's love of myth, with 'The Golden Bough' being name-checked. And it's truly a lot of fun!
The 60s Penguin edition that I own adds an extra layer of enjoyment. Its cover has a certain premonition of Tracey Emin camping it up, perhaps in a scene from 'Kill Bill'? It gives the impression that Honor Klein, the rather ambiguous and potentially demonic figure, is about to decapitate everyone she has ever slept with, all for the sake of art! In reality, Honor Klein is the is-she-isn't-she character who first repels the narrator and then draws him in. She is bolder than his mistress and less of a drama queen than his wife.
As adults, we have a choice. We can attempt to live life by utilizing the best characteristics of childhood, such as being friendly, open, inclusive, and looking at the world around us with wonder. Or, we can choose the worst, like taking the one-way system to the egocentric city center in Bratsville. Murdoch tended to write about people who firmly belonged to the second camp, to the extent that her characters are often very hard to love. Nevertheless, this is my favorite Murdoch so far. It eerily captures the fine line between having an excess of emotion and having a lack thereof.
Currently editing the review with additional observations from my second reading, this December 2020.
Martin is in a rather enviable position, or so he thinks. He has a beautiful wife, Antonia, whom he loves deeply, and a much younger mistress, Georgie, who adds an extra layer of excitement to his life and makes him feel like a "real" man. However, his perfect world comes crashing down when Antonia announces that she is leaving him for her psychoanalyst, Palmer Anderson, who just so happens to be Martin's friend. As if that weren't enough, things quickly spiral out of control as both Antonia and Palmer seem determined to keep Martin in their lives, whether he wants to be there or not. What follows is a hilarious and absurd comedy of errors, with Martin finding himself in increasingly ridiculous situations. Despite it all, he remains the most level-headed and least deviant character in the story. I thoroughly enjoyed this book and will definitely be reading more of Murdoch's work. The audiobook, narrated by the talented Derek Jacobi, was an added bonus. His voices and delivery brought the characters to life and made the listening experience even more enjoyable. Since then, I've read a couple more of Murdoch's novels and have become a confirmed fan.
So many different events are going on