Dedicated with affection to Professor Manuel Alfonseca, and to The Catholic Book Club, this is my criticism of a reread. The work of C.S. Lewis has been edited by @edicionesrialp, though I found errors in the prologue. The information about F. Anstey and his works was incorrect. Regarding "Vice versa", several films have been made. The other error was about David Lindsay and his "A Voyage to Arcturus".
The prologue has interesting aspects like a eulogy of works Lewis liked. It also mentions books inspired by "The Screwtape Letters", such as "Cartas del sobrino a su Diablo" by @juan_manuel_de_prada and "The loser letters: A Comic Tale of Life, Death and Atheism" by Mary Eberstadt Tadeci. I also recommend "Faith in demons. El ateísmo superado" by Fabrice Hadjadj.
Lewis commented on a priest's criticism, letters from a nurse, and books that inspired him. He compared his book with others like "El diablo cojuelo" and discussed the influence of "Paradise Lost" and "Faust". My criticism is more in line with what Leonardo Castellani points out. The French epistolary genre and its famous works were also mentioned.
Lewis would have liked to introduce consciousness or a guardian angel. The book is dedicated to J.R.R. Tolkien, and it has a Kafkaesque element and responds to the allegorical genre. We can now analyze the underworld correspondence between uncle and nephew. Screwtape gives Wormwood wrong instructions, and there is mistrust among demons. Screwtape advises Wormwood on how to lose his victim, including stimulating differences and extreme positions. I disagree with Lewis on the impact of wars on religiosity. Lewis has some outdated views on the sexual theme.
He wants them to learn to walk and must therefore take away His hand; and if only the will to walk is really there He is pleased even with their stumbles. Do not be deceived, Wormwood. Our cause is never more in danger than when a human, no longer desiring, but still intending, to do our Enemy’s will, looks round upon a universe from which every trace of Him seems to have vanished, and asks why he has been forsaken, and still obeys.\\n \\n
So! Your man is in love—and in the worst kind he could possibly have fallen into—and with a girl who does not even appear in the report you sent me….I have looked up this girl’s dossier and am horrified at what I find. Not only a Christian but such a Christian—a vile, sneaking, simpering, demure, monosyllabic, mouse-like, watery, insignificant, virginal, bread-and-butter miss. The little brute. She makes me vomit.\\n
Indeed the safest road to Hell is the gradual one—the gentle slope, soft underfoot, without sudden turnings, without milestones, without signposts.\\n \\n
More fun and playful than I'd anticipated.
As a platform upon which to discuss his beliefs and thoughts on theology, government, society, and the nature of mankind in general, C.S. Lewis constructed The Screwtape Letters. It is an epistolary novel in the form of instructive letters from senior demon Screwtape to his nephew Wormwood, a sort of demonic trainee. For all intents and purposes, they are lectures, but lectures jazzed up and made more palatable for the student's mind.
It was about 20 years ago that I read about The Screwtape Letters in college. I took a mental note of its subject matter and filed it away as "to be read sometime in the far off future." Well, that future arrived in June '12, and I'd completely forgotten Lewis' literary machinations regarding this book. So, I spent the first few pages somewhat perplexed, trying to figure out who the characters were. Then, once I accomplished that, I had to reorder my brain to think backwards because essentially everything written by Screwtape is in reverse of what Lewis means and feels about whatever subject it may be. As Screwtape advises Wormwood on methods of securing the damnation of a British man, my wee little brain was sprinting to keep up with the conversation as I decoded it, considered Lewis' thoughts, and matched them with or against my own beliefs. Ever since reading his The Four Loves, I've enjoyed picking at Lewis' theories. So, for me, this was a fun exercise, especially when immersed in such an entertaining forum. Since I surely missed a few things, I'll no doubt be going back to this...probably in the 2030s.