...
Show More
I first read these books when I was really young - around 7 or 8 years old. Recently, during the break between semesters, I made an attempt to re-read them. And I discovered several things that my younger self either hadn't noticed or had eventually forgotten. To begin with, C.S. Lewis is simply not a good writer. Although the stories have an interesting premise, when it comes to the art of storytelling, he completely fails. The plot drags to a snail's pace in the most boring parts, and Lewis either neglects or gives a very brief account of what should have been the most fascinating aspects of the stories. To say that the characters are one-dimensional might even be too kind to the author. Secondly, I have watched the movie adaptations that have been released in recent years (with my little sister, I must add!). After comparing these movies with the actual books, I can clearly see that the movies have actually enhanced the plot. In a rare instance, they included more plot details and character depth than the books because they recognized that the original needed some improvement. Finally, I was shocked by how heavy-handed the religious subtext was. It was much less subtle than the word implies. I have no problem with there being a fable-like element in stories, and it's absurd to assume that an author's prejudices won't be reflected in their work. However, when the moral of the story hits you so forcefully in some parts that it completely takes you out of the story, you know the author has made a mistake. So, that's my rant about the Chronicles of Narnia. The second time around, I only managed to get through "The Voyage of the Dawn Treader" and then stopped. I couldn't find the next book in the series in my house, but I didn't really look very hard and wasn't too bothered about it.