...
Show More
I actually read this in one sitting, which truly surprised me. It's quite a rare occurrence for me to do that. As you can guess from its unputdownableness, it was a really good read and an intriguing and interesting "mystery." I quantify that word because it was about as much of a mystery as an episode of "Columbo." That is to say, it was fairly obvious what was going on from the first chapter. However, I still enjoyed the rather circuitous path that DG sent her protagonist on. Lord John is an officer in the Jacobite period and he's a bit of a detective. I understand that he was a minor character in her larger sagas "Outlander" and "Cross Stitch." As a period piece, it was pretty good. And as a British historical written by a non-Brit, she does a rather good job. There are points in the book where I felt she was a bit too heavy-handed with the period feel and I was jolted out of "being in the time" to "being taught." But these instances were few enough and didn't really spoil the enjoyment. As a slashy piece, it was nicely done. She writes a homosexual character in a mainstream book and portrays the sex in a dot dot dot way that is very sexy, leaving a lot to the imagination and for the fanficcer, without really upsetting the sensibilities of those who don't want to read about throbbing cocks. I've been wondering whether I should split my writing into erotica and less-so to appeal to the mainstream a little more. I haven't decided yet. Lord John is an interesting and nicely angsty character, but I didn't feel that there was enough of the essential "him" in this for me to really get to know him. I know that a lot of people who pick up this book will have already met him in other works, but I hadn't. So I didn't even know what he looked like and it wasn't until about halfway through the book that I discovered he had blond hair. I was rather shocked as she'd left it so long that I'd already put a face and appearance to him. I would have liked a description earlier on. Sharpe is described at the beginning of every book, as far as I can remember, for those readers who have picked up the books out of order. The writing is good, a fine mix of period and yet doesn't leave the reader struggling through run-on sentences worthy of Austen. If I have any one quibble about it, it's the predictability. The whole plot didn't give me any surprises. It led (for me) inexorably from one fact to another. I think that she could write something that would make me say "OMG I didn't see that coming" in the way that George RR Martin always manages to do, but she didn't manage it in this book. And if she's setting Lord John up to be an historical detective, then it's something she will need to do, or Lord John will be as predictable as Jessica Fletcher. All in all, I'll give it a 7 out of 10. I'll get the next Lord John books, but I'll probably get them from the library rather than buying them.