This is a rather strange and somewhat misleading three-star rating I'm giving to Hunter S. Thompson's book, Generation of Swine. It's misleading for several reasons. Firstly, when you have over 100 pieces that were likely originally written for various periodicals (the book doesn't specify their original publication sources) taken out of context and compiled in a book, and some are excellent, some average, and some terrible, it's a bit of a math puzzle to come up with an unassuming three-star experience. But this book was not that at all, despite how it may seem from my rating.
Here's what it really is: a collection of journalistic essays that begins excitingly, with a gonzo or new feel, but ends with essays that have devolved into political opinion pieces. Granted, even these are more enjoyable to read than your typical political journalism. After all, who else but Hunter Thompson could get away with a weekly column labeling politicians as "Swine of the Week" and still be taken seriously? However, Hunter Thompson is at his best when he and his friends take you on a tour that other guides wouldn't. You're not entirely sure about the facts presented on this tour. For example, when Hunter claims he met Bishop Desmond Tutu and Desmond told him to bet against the Bears in Super Bowl XX, you're left scratching your head. Or when Hunter's friend Skinner (who is Skinner anyway? The story doesn't tell us) calls him up and tells him to pack his bags because they're going to Port-au-Prince to cover the Haitian revolution from the voodoo angle, it's equally puzzling.
Full disclosure: I have developed a rather healthy obsession with Hunter S. Thompson. I've read many of his Rolling Stone pieces, as well as Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas and his piece on the Kentucky Derby. I've seen numerous documentaries about him and heard people from various backgrounds talk about him with a mix of deference, respect, and bewilderment. It all comes down to this for me: Am I insanely in love with the writing or the writer? And the million-dollar question that follows: With this style of storytelling, this genre-bending, this opaque journalism where so much dramatic license is taken and the journalist becomes part of the story, does that first question even matter? It's something I'm left to ponder. Generation of Swine has been a turning point for me in my opinion of Hunter S. Thompson. Without the gonzo aspect, without the storyteller at the center of the story, shaping it as he sees fit, I'm left thinking that the writer and the writing have to blend into one strange entity to pique my interest. Otherwise, it's just three-star writing.