A post-modernist perspective on Plato, Socrates, Aristotle, and Rembrandt offers a unique and thought-provoking exploration.

It's nearly impossible not to have an affinity for Catch-22, yet even if one does, this particular account can be a rather arduous journey.

There are sporadic moments of wit and wisdom, such as the statement: "The motion in the Athenian Assembly to invade Syracuse to restore order in Sicily was deceitful, corrupt, stupid, chauvinistic, irrational, and suicidal. It carried with a large majority." However, these isolated bon mots are insufficient to maintain one's interest throughout.

The post-modernist lens through which these great figures are viewed may offer new insights, but it also presents challenges in terms of comprehension and engagement.

Nonetheless, it is an attempt to reevaluate and understand the significance of these historical and artistic icons in a contemporary context.

Despite the difficulties, it is an endeavor that can potentially expand our understanding and appreciation of the past.

This is a book that is truly distinct from Catch-22, and any attempt to simply compare the two would not do justice to either. Nevertheless, I am going to undertake this comparison. In contrast to Catch-22, this book is far more refined and sophisticated. It predominantly focuses on art and intellectuals, delving deep into their lives.

The centerpiece of this remarkable book is a painting by Rembrandt. In this painting, we see "Aristotle" with his hand resting on a bust of "Homer" as he appears to ponder vacantly. I use the quotes here because the book makes it clear: nothing is as it seems. It could potentially be a painting that might not even be by Rembrandt. The figure posing as Aristotle might be someone the painter thought better suited the name, and the bust of Homer could be of a person who may or may not have actually existed, or perhaps it represents a collection of people, making it a rather random bust. Moreover, it may not necessarily be the painter's best work, and yet, at one point in history, it was the most expensive painting.

Speaking of history, the book follows several characters from different eras: Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Rembrandt, along with their contemporaries. As the author skillfully narrates and correlates their stories, we are taken on a crash course through Greek history. We learn about the principle philosophies that governed it, the nature of democracy and politics, the machinations of war, the need for conflicts and their aftermath, and so much more. Through this exploration, the author prompts us to reflect and form our own opinions about how much things have changed over time and yet, in many ways, remain the same. We observe the same interplay of emotions, rhetoric, and reasoning in the modern world as the modern-day equivalents of these characters make the same mistakes as their historical counterparts.

Upon a closer examination of history, we gain a clearer understanding of the nature of capitalism and communism, the esoteric emphasis on ethics, the way civilizations have been built and destroyed, and the role that people play in these processes. One of the recurring themes in the book is the part played by the bourgeoisie and the wealthy elite in running what is essentially a kleptocracy and an oligarchy. It highlights the profit motive and how it drives people to do whatever it takes in the pursuit of wealth and power: appealing to emotions and using rhetoric, waging wars, putting innocent lives at risk, and making a fortune in the process.

This book is a tour de force that unrelentingly breaks down the nature of socio-political history into its fundamental elements and uses the monologues of the thinkers of the time to shed light on them. It does an incredible job of making the reader relate to the present by looking back at the past, as we realize how much of it still holds true. The characters may change, but history has a tendency to repeat itself.

The book isn't as blatantly funny as Catch-22; instead, it is more witty. It won't make you burst out laughing, but it will make you smile and nod in recognition of the author's intended wit. He relies on ironies and subtle nods to the circumstantial humor in history to keep the reader engaged. A cursory reading of the background and lives of Greek philosophers would be extremely beneficial for the reader to better understand and immerse themselves in the book. Additionally, having access to some resources to view the paintings referenced in the book would enhance the reading experience. It sets the stage for the reader to truly delve into the world that the author has so vividly described, where we jump between different characters and time frames and discover a common thread that runs through history, binding them all together.

This is an absolute gem of a brilliant little book.

It is truly unique and nothing like anything you've ever read before.

Unlike many other books that can be devoured quickly, this one requires you to go slow and really contemplate each word and idea.

It may take some time and effort, but the rewards are incredibly great.

As you progress through the book, you'll find yourself opening up new perspectives and gaining a deeper understanding of various concepts.

The author's writing style is engaging and thought-provoking, making it a pleasure to read.

Whether you're looking for a book to expand your knowledge or simply to enjoy a good read, this little gem is definitely worth checking out.

You won't be disappointed.

Heller's Catch-22 was likely the most renowned novel at Maine Township South High School. One Friday afternoon, during a study break in the library, I made an attempt to read it. However, this was interrupted by a brush on the nape of my neck. Dean Elbert Smith, dissatisfied with the feel and insisting on a tapered bristle, informed me immediately that I was suspended until my hair was cut to the required regulation. I handed the copy of Heller back to my friend Richard, who was seated in front of me. We marvelled at what an unpleasant person the Dean of Boys was and then I went home at the end of the period to tell my Dad what had occurred.

Dad's reaction was "No one tells you when to get your hair cut but me." Indeed, I was already scheduled for a haircut at the Polish barbershop in Edison Park. Now, though, it had become a matter of authority. I decided not to get my hair trimmed.

During this period towards the end of secondary school, I had been doing occasional weekend volunteer work downtown for the ACLU. Dad was a member, and student rights were a recurring issue in their magazine. Over time, I had met several young attorneys. So, that weekend, when I went to the office and recounted the story, everyone offered to assist if legal action became necessary.

This was sufficient for Dad. I was expected to come to school with a parent on Monday, with my hair trimmed and looking ashamed, for a meeting with the authorities. Dad, who usually didn't even bother to glance at my report cards or show any interest in my schooling, volunteered to be the parent.

The meeting was attended by the Dean, Principal Clyde Watson, and briefly by Assistant Dean Barker in the Principal's office. It started civilly enough, with Dad inquiring about the dress code policies. It ended as an argument between him and the Dean and Principal regarding the war in Vietnam. The decisive factor, however, was Dad's threat of legal action. The school didn't want negative publicity, and in loco parentis clearly wasn't a principle that would apply in my case. I was readmitted, and I didn't cut my hair again for nine years.

I went on to watch the filmed version of Catch-22 but never got around to reading the book again. It was perhaps too realistic, too similar to the petty authoritarianism of high school. Additionally, it wasn't a very good film – at least I didn't find it funny, just depressing.

The fact that I hadn't finished Heller's book bothered me. I almost always complete what I start. Consequently, when I discovered this other novel by him, a novel that promised to be about, among other things, classical Athens, my reluctance was overcome. I thought this might be different. I purchased the book and finished it. Unfortunately, just like my experience with Catch-22 in high school, I wasn't overly impressed, despite having a general sympathy for Heller's critique of the United States.

Jak ja lubię tę XX wieczny ironizm. It is truly a remarkable and captivating aspect. The way it weaves through various situations, adding a touch of unexpectedness and depth. It has the power to make us laugh, think, and even question the norms. This eternal irony can be found in literature, art, and everyday life. It challenges our perspectives and forces us to look at things from a different angle. Whether it's a witty remark in a conversation or a clever plot twist in a story, it always manages to surprise and engage us. I find myself constantly drawn to it, as it enriches my understanding of the world and brings a sense of joy and excitement. It is like a hidden gem that reveals itself at the most unexpected moments, making life all the more interesting and fulfilling.

4.8 stars!

This is my 2nd favorite Heller novel. I have read it several times and even gifted it to my philosophy professor.

The quotes in this book are truly thought-provoking. For example, "There are outrages and there are outrages, and some are more outrageous than others." It makes you stop and think about the various injustices in the world.

Mankind's resilience is also highlighted. What horrifies us one week can become acceptable the next. The death of Socrates, for instance, had little impact on the history of Athens. In fact, it may have even enhanced the city's reputation.

Heller also makes the point that the death of a person is not as important to the future as the literature about it. History, according to him, is not something we can learn from and apply directly. Henry Ford's statement, "History is bunk," seems to support this view.

Heller weaves a rich tapestry of art, philosophy, economics, history, and humor. Only Kurt Vonnegut can be compared to him in this regard.

The quote, "As soon as there was profit, there were people who wanted to make it, more than they wanted to make anything else," is a powerful commentary on human nature and the pursuit of wealth.

This book is a welcome addition to any literature collection. It will make you think, laugh, and gain a new perspective on the world.

I’m not typically a devotee of non-linear narratives. However, this particular one was truly captivating and at times, quite enjoyable. It took the reader on a lively adventure through 1600s Amsterdam and ancient Greece, delving deep into the concept of what is genuine and what is false. This exploration strongly echoed today’sclamor about “fake news.” The concise examination of Thucydides from the perspective of Vietnam was fascinating. (I had initially read it from the viewpoint of Iraq.) It was nearly impossible not to envision the vicious Twitter feuds playing out within the corrupt Athenian justice system.

Composed in the 1980s, this story artfully employs history, humor, and magical realism in a manner that never seems outdated. Instead, it offers astute commentary on much of the political upheaval that has occurred over the past 20 years. It serves as a reminder that the issues we face today have roots in the past, and that by looking back, we can gain valuable insights into our present circumstances.

The story’s ability to blend different time periods and genres in a seamless and engaging way is a testament to the author’s skill. It invites the reader to question their own perception of reality and to consider the role that history plays in shaping our understanding of the world. Overall, it is a thought-provoking and entertaining read that I would highly recommend.

I'm a little embarrassed to admit that it took me a few years to complete this book.

There were countless other books that I had to read for school and work, but this novel presented its own set of challenges.

As far as I know, Heller has done something truly original in the history of literature.

He tells the story of Rembrandt painting Aristotle contemplating a bust of Homer.

On the very first page, we discover that the painting of Aristotle has the ability to observe the world, think, and feel, yet it cannot move.

Yes, I know it sounds impossible, just like in Toy Story, but once you accept the premise of the book, the rest becomes a whole lot of fun.

This juxtaposition of historical figures allows Heller to explore the histories and philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, jumping back and forth between ancient Greece and Holland during the time of Rembrandt.

Since Rembrandt's painting has a life of its own, Heller is able to outline the histories of his other paintings as well: who bought them, for how much, and the changing opinions of audiences and art critics towards Rembrandt.

All of this is combined with a rather unsubtle commentary on modern America, with numerous pointed jabs at Cold War politics and American imperialism.

In conclusion, this is a philosophical and historical fiction that is filled with wry humor. It may be demanding on the reader, but it is well worth the effort!

Tying together Ancient Greece with 17th century Netherlands with 20th century US using Aristotle’s ruminations as the connecting device is indeed a clever concept.

It allows for an interesting exploration of how different eras and cultures have interacted with and been influenced by Aristotle's ideas.

However, it seems that Heller, in this regard, has made a significant oversight. He appears to have forgotten to include a proper plot.

Without a plot, the connection between these diverse time periods and places may feel somewhat forced or lacking in a cohesive narrative.

A well-developed plot would have added depth and interest to the overall work, making it more engaging for the reader and perhaps allowing for a more profound exploration of the themes and ideas presented.

As it stands, while the concept is clever, the absence of a plot detracts from the potential impact of the piece.

I'm not entirely certain what this particular novel is all about. In fact, I'm not even convinced that it can accurately be labeled as a novel.

However, there is no doubt that Joseph Heller was a true genius. He had an uncanny ability to delve deeper into the true essence of humanity than anyone else that comes to my mind.

"Pictures This" might not have reached the same level of acclaim as "Catch-22," but that's perhaps only because it would present greater challenges in terms of being adapted into a movie.

Despite this, "Pictures This" still holds its own charm and offers unique insights into the human condition. Heller's writing style is as captivating as ever, and his ability to make us question our beliefs and values is truly remarkable.

Even if this work doesn't quite measure up to the masterpiece that is "Catch-22," it still serves as a testament to Heller's genius and his lasting impact on the world of literature.

I don't like the science of history. Because it's not really a science at all...

In its dullest form, it's an endless list of events with dates.

In its most absurd form, it's the attempts of historians (each in their own way) to establish (invent? reconstruct? imagine?) connections between these events in the list.

But the most important thing (as someone great said): history teaches us that it teaches us nothing.

Although... Almost every great (well-known, popular) historian is necessarily a writer. Take Granovsky's lectures on the history of medieval Europe, and you'll enjoy it))) But then don't ask about the dates, and even more so about the clever interconnections between them! The spirit of the era has been tasted, emotions and impressions have been obtained in excess, but nothing more...

History acquires beauty and meaning only in the presentation of talented writers. Joseph Heller's book is undoubtedly deep and beautiful.

Formally, it's a kind of surrealism)) The plot is simple: Rembrandt (yes, that one) is painting Aristotle, who... is in two worlds - both on the portrait (vividly reflecting on Rembrandt))) and in his ancient Greek era.

But behind this simple plot lies the author's huge erudition, who covers practically the entire history of Western civilization in his novel, starting from the heyday of the ancient Greek polis and ending in the middle of the 20th century.

There are a huge number of historical figures in the book: Aristotle, Socrates, Plato, Rembrandt, Descartes, etc. Their fates and ideas are intertwined in the most curious way - they constantly enter into real-virtual dialogues with each other :)

And this is very interesting! It's a kind of mental experiment: indeed, what would Aristotle talk about with Descartes if he could meet him? In my opinion, the author has done this experiment very well - subtly, cleverly, with humor...

There are many obvious (and not so obvious) counterpoints in the book. For example, the extremely unattractive Rembrandt, a rogue and a libertine, is clearly opposed to the well-behaved and poor Socrates.

The book can also be boldly classified as dystopian. I would generally recommend it to all lovers of democracy to read in an obligatory order. Because there is nothing new under the sun :( And democracy in its ancient Greek version is much more honest than today's heirs of democracy.

But all the well-known "tools of democratization" already existed then. And the "rule of law" (although it was precisely the democratic court that, with the help of the law, actually humiliated Socrates for no reason); and the "universal suffrage" (which easily makes decisions to bankrupt neighboring poleis, just so that we are well off); and the "negotiation process" (when there is a squadron of warships outside your walls, and regardless of the outcome of the negotiations, all adult able-bodied men are destroyed); and "freedom of speech", when the internal opponents of the war with our polis are declared "fighters for freedom", and the supporters of independence are called "bloody tyrants", and so on.

In terms of such "political technologies", it's a very strong and very modern book.

It's quite easy and interesting to read. I recommend it.

I really wanted to like this thing.

There were indeed a few comments that were quite funny and made me smile for a moment.

However, overall, it just seemed so pretentious.

It was as if it was trying too hard to be something it wasn't, to impress others with its supposed depth and sophistication.

The way it presented itself, with all its fancy words and elaborate expressions, felt forced and insincere.

Instead of coming across as genuine and relatable, it left me with a sense of distance and a lack of connection.

Maybe if it had toned down the pretentiousness and been more authentic, I would have been able to truly appreciate it.

But as it stands now, it's just a bit of a disappointment.