...
Show More
I have a great affection for Michael Lewis. However, this particular book was an outlier for me. The writing gave the impression of being rushed, and it didn't seem to have been thoroughly edited. Strangely, he alternates between referring to the protagonist as "Jim" and "Clark," and at times, this occurs even within the same sentence. The storyline has its flaws as well. It becomes overly detailed in areas where it isn't necessary, while lacking in detail in those places where one would typically expect it. The book is presented from the perspective of Jim Clark, glorifying him while demonizing his opponents. This is contrary to Lewis's usual approach. Overall, it's not a terrible book, but it does have more flaws on the surface compared to most of his other works.